Literature DB >> 34372820

Prediction and trend of tactile acuity, pain and disability in acute LBP: a six-month prospective cohort study.

Rita Morf1,2, Fabian Pfeiffer1,2, Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker1, André Meichtry1, Hannu Luomajoki3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic back pain is known to be associated with altered tactile acuity. Tactile acuity is measured using the Two-Point Discrimination (TPD) test in both clinical and research settings. In subjects with chronic low back pain, the TPD threshold (TPDT) is increased and is associated with persistent pain. It remains unknown, however, whether TPDT is also altered in cases of clinical acute pain, or whether it could be used as a predictor of future pain and disability at an early stage of LBP. The main objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of baseline TPDT for pain and disability at 3 and 6 months after the onset of acute LBP. The TPDT in acute low back pain (LBP) and the development of TPDT over 6 months has also been assessed.
METHODS: LBP participants (n = 124) with acute LBP (< 4 weeks) were included. Subjects were examined within 4 weeks of pain onset and followed-up after 3 and 6 months of pain onset. Horizontal and vertical TPDTs of the lower back were collected. Linear mixed models were subsequently used to evaluate the association of TPDT with pain and disability over time.
RESULTS: The vertical TPDT showed a mean (SD) of 4.9 cm (1.6) and the horizontal TPDT a mean (SD) of 6.0 cm (1.5) at baseline. The vertical TPDT altered from baseline up to 6 months from 4.9 to 4.6 cm and the horizontal TPDT from 6.0 to 5.4 cm. The association between the TPDT and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after 6 months was moderate. Linear mixed models revealed no association between TPDT, pain and disability over the progression of LBP.
CONCLUSION: TPDTs appear to be raised in subjects with acute LBP. However, our study revealed no predictive capability of the TPDT for disability and pain. No comparisons are possible in the absence of similar studies, indicating the need for further research is in this area.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability; LBP; Pain; Tactile acuity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34372820     DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04530-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  39 in total

1.  The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings.

Authors:  Mugdha Gore; Alesia Sadosky; Brett R Stacey; Kei-Sing Tai; Douglas Leslie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Recurrence of low back pain is common: a prospective inception cohort study.

Authors:  Tatiane da Silva; Kathryn Mills; Benjamin T Brown; Natasha Pocovi; Tarcisio de Campos; Christopher Maher; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  J Physiother       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 7.000

Review 3.  The Epidemiology of low back pain.

Authors:  D Hoy; P Brooks; F Blyth; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  The prognosis of acute low back pain in primary care in the United States: a 2-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Viranjini Gopisetty; Elizabeth Bartmess; Mike Acree; Alice Pressman; Harley Goldberg; Frederick M Hecht; Tim Carey; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care?

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Nadine E Foster; Kate M Dunn; Peter Croft
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Yuan Bo Peng; Madelon L Peters; Perry N Fuchs; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instruments.

Authors:  M Melloh; A Elfering; C Egli Presland; C Roeder; T Barz; C Rolli Salathé; O Tamcan; U Mueller; J C Theis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review.

Authors:  Roger Hilfiker; Lucas M Bachmann; Carolin A-M Heitz; Tobias Lorenz; Harri Joronen; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09

Review 10.  Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Michael I Bennett; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Nanna B Finnerup; Michael B First; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Stein Kaasa; Beatrice Korwisi; Eva Kosek; Patricia Lavand'homme; Michael Nicholas; Serge Perrot; Joachim Scholz; Stephan Schug; Blair H Smith; Peter Svensson; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.