Literature DB >> 20932646

Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care?

Margreth Grotle1, Nadine E Foster, Kate M Dunn, Peter Croft.   

Abstract

Few studies have investigated whether prognostic indicators, which contribute to the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP), are also those which contribute to continuing persistence of chronic LBP. We compared the contribution of physical, psychological and social indicators to predicting disability after one year between consulters with LBP of less than 3 months duration and more than 3 months duration. Data from two large prospective cohort studies of consecutive patients consulting with LBP in general practices were merged, providing complete data for 258 cases with acute/subacute LBP and 668 cases with chronic LBP at 12 months follow-up. There were significant differences between the two LBP groups in baseline characteristics and clinical course of disability, assessed by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, during the year of follow-up. Adjusted associations between potential prognostic indicators and disability at 12months were carried out in the two LBP subgroups. The final multivariable regression models showed that being non-employed, having widespread pain, a high level of Chronic Pain Grade, and catastrophising were the strongest prognostic indicators for disability at 12 months in both LBP groups. Fear of pain was significantly associated with disability in chronic LBP. Importantly, beyond baseline disability, the effect size of the other prognostic indicators for poor outcome was rather low. These findings must continue to challenge researchers to identify useful early predictors of outcome in persons with disabling back pain, as screening and targeted treatment approaches are dependent upon prognostic indicators with clinical significance.
Copyright © 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20932646      PMCID: PMC3398128          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  64 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  The prognostic ability of the STarT Back Tool was affected by episode duration.

Authors:  Lars Morso; Alice Kongsted; Lise Hestbaek; Peter Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prognosis in people with back pain.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The predictive ability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in a Danish secondary care setting.

Authors:  Lars Morsø; Peter Kent; Claus Manniche; Hanne B Albert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Chronic Pain in HIV-Infected Patients: Relationship to Depression, Substance Use, and Mental Health and Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Lisa A Uebelacker; Risa B Weisberg; Debra S Herman; Genie L Bailey; Megan M Pinkston-Camp; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Can demographic and anthropometric characteristics predict clinical improvement in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain?

Authors:  Indiara Soares Oliveira; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Alessandra Narciso Garcia; Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Barriers and progress in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  [Comparison of two screening questionnaires for patients with low back pain. Collation of risk factors for chronification].

Authors:  C O Schmidt; G Lindena; M Pfingsten; T Kohlmann; J-F Chenot
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Construct and criterion-based validity of brief pain coping scales in persons with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Mark P Jensen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Knee pain during daily tasks, knee osteoarthritis severity, and widespread pain.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.