Literature DB >> 29058079

Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) fixation for femoral stem revision in periprosthetic fractures: Dall-Miles plate versus cables.

Gerard A Sheridan1,2, Adam Galbraith3, Stephen R Kearns3, William Curtin3, Colin G Murphy3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is a well-established surgical technique used for femoral stem retrieval in revision hip arthroplasty procedures. Fixation of ETO is commonly achieved through wire, cable or cable-plate fixation. No evidence exists to date to suggest which method is superior when used in an acute traumatic setting.
METHODS: Thirty cases of acute periprosthetic fracture requiring femoral stem revision with an ETO were identified over a 10-year period. Each case had a loose femoral prosthesis which was revised using an ETO approach. Nineteen of these were fixed using cables only, and 11 were fixed using a cable-plate construct. Radiographic outcomes measured included greater trochanter migration, osteolysis, union, time to union and overall success using the Beals and Tower classification. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score.
RESULTS: Twenty-three Vancouver B/C-type fractures were identified. The remaining seven consisted of other fracture types with a loose femoral stem requiring revision through ETO. Mean follow-up was 32 months in the cable group and 12 months in the cable-plate group. The cable-plate construct performed better than cables alone. Mean migration rates were 1.7 mm lower in the cable-plate group (p < 0.05). Beals and Tower classification of radiographic outcomes was significantly better in the cable-plate group (p < 0.01). Modified Harris Hip Scores were better in this group also (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: When utilising an ETO approach for femoral stem revision in acute periprosthetic fractures, superior clinical and radiographic outcomes can be achieved if fixation involves a cable-plate system instead of cables only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cable; Cable–plate; Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO); Periprosthetic fracture (PPF)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29058079     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2064-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  17 in total

1.  Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Venkat R Rapuri; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  A retrospective review of the Dall-Miles plate for periprosthetic femoral fractures: twenty-seven cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dallan Dargan; Mark J Jenkinson; Joseph D Acton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint].

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

5.  Dall-Miles cable and plate fixation for the treatment of peri-prosthetic femoral fractures-analysis of results in 13 cases.

Authors:  K M Venu; R Koka; R Garikipati; Y Shenava; T S Madhu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

Authors:  R K Beals; S S Tower
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Chevron osteotomy and single wire reattachment of the greater trochanter in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Adolphson; U Jonsson; R Kalén
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

10.  Prevalence and risk factors for periprosthetic fracture in older recipients of total hip replacement: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; Julian J Z Polaris; Mitchel B Harris; Elena Losina
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  5 in total

1.  Greater trochanter fixed with a claw plate and cable system in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Tiemure Wu; Hongyi Shao; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a case series study and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Khalid Hamad; Sujith Konan
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-04-03

3.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: comparison of 3 modes of fixation: metallic wires, cables, plate, about a series of 157 cases.

Authors:  Jean Louis Prudhon; Nicolas Tardy
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-06-13

Review 4.  Trochanteric osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kavin Sundaram; Ahmed Siddiqi; Atul F Kamath; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.