Literature DB >> 3980494

Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report.

P M Pellicci, P D Wilson, C B Sledge, E A Salvati, C S Ranawat, R Poss, J J Callaghan.   

Abstract

The results of 110 revision total hip replacements performed for aseptic failure, with an average follow-up of 3.4 years, were reported in 1982. We were able to continue to follow ninety-nine of these patients for an average of 8.1 years (range, five to 12.5 years). With this longer follow-up, we found that twenty-nine (29 per cent) of these revised arthroplasties have since failed. Most of the failures after 1982 occurred in the hips that were known to have a progressive radiolucency at the time of the first evaluation. We concluded that there is an increased failure rate with longer follow-up of revision total hip replacement, and that progressive radiolucency at an interface indicates a poor prognosis for the arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3980494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  27 in total

1.  Impacted cancellous allograft in the proximal femur: early histological observations.

Authors:  K J Mulhall; W A Curtin; A M Dolan; W Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Femoral revision with an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; Andreas Baldini; Kristin Foote; Stephen Lyman; Bryan J Nestor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-12-01

3.  The Hospital for Special Surgery 1972-1989; Philip D. Wilson, Jr., Eighth Surgeon-in-Chief.

Authors:  David B Levine
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity.

Authors:  R J Claridge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Y Sun; T Stürmer; K P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  [Massive reconstruction of acetabulum and proximal femur].

Authors:  D G Poitout; P Tropiano; M Bernat; J F Moulene
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-10

7.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  THE CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND BIOMECHANICAL PRESENTATION OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP ABDUCTOR TENDON TEARS.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Theertha Retheesh; Rinky Mutreja; Gregory C Janes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

9.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

10.  A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients.

Authors:  K Randhawa; F S Hossain; B Smith; Cyril Mauffrey; T Lawrence
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.