Literature DB >> 30673332

Patient Shielding in Diagnostic Imaging: Discontinuing a Legacy Practice.

Rebecca M Marsh1, Michael Silosky1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient shielding is standard practice in diagnostic imaging, despite growing evidence that it provides negligible or no benefit and carries a substantial risk of increasing patient dose and compromising the diagnostic efficacy of an image. The historical rationale for patient shielding is described, and the folly of its continued use is discussed.
CONCLUSION: Although change is difficult, it is incumbent on radiologic technologists, medical physicists, and radiologists to abandon the practice of patient shielding in radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gonadal shielding; patient safety; patient shielding; radiation; shielding

Year:  2019        PMID: 30673332     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Radiation use in diagnostic imaging in children: approaching the value of the pediatric radiology community.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Erich Sorantin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-03-20

2.  Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Wiam Elshami; Mohamed M Abuzaid; H O Tekin
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  APQS consensus regarding patient shielding during routine radiographic imaging.

Authors:  Russell Oliver Kosik; Swee-Tian Quek; Elaine Kan; Shigeki Aoki; Chin Hua Yang; Napapong Pongnapang; Maryastuti Setioko; Wing P Chan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  TO USE OR NOT USE PATIENT SHIELDING ON PREGNANT WOMEN UNDERGOING CT PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY.

Authors:  Dino Begano; Marcus Söderberg; Anetta Bolejko
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerhard Kütterer; Pierre J Kicken; Marij J Frantzen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

Review 6.  Imaging modalities in pregnant cancer patients.

Authors:  Vincent Vandecaveye; Frédéric Amant; Frédéric Lecouvet; Kristel Van Calsteren; Raphaëla Carmen Dresen
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield.

Authors:  Zahroh F; Anam C; Sutanto H; Irdawati Y; Arifin Z; Kartikasari Y
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Women's awareness regarding the use of dental imaging during pregnancy.

Authors:  Lina Bahanan; Abdulrahman Tehsin; Reyouf Mousa; Mohammed Albadi; Mohammed Barayan; Emad Khan; Hanadi Khalifah
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Using patient shielding - What is the risk?

Authors:  Peter Hiles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 10.  Neurocritical Care of the Pregnant Patient.

Authors:  Deepa Malaiyandi; Elysia James; Lindsay Peglar; Nurose Karim; Nicholas Henkel; Kristin Guilliams
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.