| Literature DB >> 34335850 |
Marija Ivanov1, Uroš Gašić1, Dejan Stojković1, Marina Kostić1, Danijela Mišić1, Marina Soković1.
Abstract
Artemisia absinthium L. (Asteraceae) is traditionally used for gastrointestinal ailments and disorders linked to numerous risk factors including microbial infections. We aimed to provide contemporary evidence for its ethnopharmacological use and determine its antimicrobial capacity and mode of action, cytotoxicity, and phenolic constituents. Ethnopharmacological survey was conducted using semistructured interviews. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm capacities were determined by microdilution/crystal violet assay, respectively. Modes of action tested include estimation of exopolysaccharide production (congo red binding assay) and interference with membrane integrity (crystal violet uptake and nucleotide leakage assay). Cytotoxicity was determined using crystal violet assay. Polyphenolic profiling was done by advanced liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (UHPLC-LTQ OrbiTrap MS). Artemisia absinthium in Serbia is traditionally used for gastrointestinal disorders, among others. Further study revealed high antifungal capacity of herb ethanolic extract towards range of Candida species (MIC 0.5-1 mg/mL) along with promising antibacterial activities (MIC 0.25-4 mg/mL). Interference with membrane integrity could be observed as a possible antimicrobial mechanism. Antibiofilm potential can be considered as high (towards C. krusei) to limited (towards P. aeruginosa) and moderate based on reduction in exopolysaccharide content. In concentrations up to 400 µg/mL, no cytotoxicity was observed towards HaCaT and HGF-1 cell lines. Polyphenolic analysis revealed twenty-one different constituents. A. absinthium usage as a gastrointestinal ailment remedy has been confirmed in vitro by its antimicrobial capacity towards microorganisms whose presence is linked to the diseases and associated complications and noncytotoxic nature of the natural product. The observed activities could be attributed to the present phenolic compounds.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34335850 PMCID: PMC8324356 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9961089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Ethnomedicinal use of wormwood in Serbia, collected data in the field.
| Gender | Age group | Education | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 38 (32.48%) | 20–40 | 15 (12.82%) | Primary | 14 (11.96%) |
| Female | 79 (67.52%) | 40–60 | 67 (57.26%) | Secondary | 56 (47.86%) |
| 60–80 | 35 (29.91%) | High | 47 (40.17%) | ||
| Total informants | 117 | ||||
|
| |||||
| Ethnomedicinal use | Citation for particular use | Plant part used (number of reports) | Preparation methods | Fidelity level (%) | |
| No medicinal use | 29 | — | — | — | |
| Aperitif, appetizer | 46 | 24–leaves | Alcoholic solution | 52.27 | |
| 22–herb | |||||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 35 | 35–herb | Alcoholic solution; boiled as tea | 39.77 | |
| Wound healing | 24 | 11–leaves | Direct application of plant parts on wounded skin; lard coating with dry flowers | 27.27 | |
| 10–herb | |||||
| 3–flowers | |||||
| Coughs | 21 | 21–herb | Tea; alcoholic solution | 23.86 | |
| Improvement of memory | 7 | 6–roots | Alcoholic solution; chewing | 7.95 | |
| 1–herb | |||||
| Preventive | 5 | 5–herb | Tea | 5.68 | |
Anticandidal activity of A. absinthium L. ethanolic extract.
| Yeasts |
| Ketoconazole | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC (mg/mL) | MFC (mg/mL) | MIC ( | MFC ( | |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 6.4 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 51.2 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 51.2 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 6.4 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 6.4 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 6.4 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 6.4 |
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration and MFC: minimal fungicidal concentration.
Compounds identified in Artemisia absinthium.
| No. |
| Compound name | Molecular formula, [M–H]– | Calculated mass, [M–H]– | Exact mass, [M–H]– | Δ ppm | MS2 fragments, (% Base peak) | MS3 fragments, (% base peak) | MS4 fragments, (% base peak) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.75 | Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside | C13H15O9– | 315.07216 | 315.07153 | 2.00 |
|
| — | Melguizo-melguizo et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 2 | 4.38 | Syringic acid hexoside | C15H19O10– | 359.09837 | 359.09778 | 1.64 |
|
| — | Klick and Herrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 3 | 5.23 | 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid)a | C16H17O9– | 353.08781 | 353.08752 | 0.82 |
| 173 (75), | 109 (40), 99 (50), 85 (100) | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 4 | 5.77 | Esculina | C15H15O9– | 339.07216 | 339.07156 | 1.77 |
|
| — | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 5 | 6.17 | Feruloylquinic acid | C17H19O9– | 367.10346 | 367.10281 | 1.77 | 203 (15), 193 (10), | 173 (25), | — | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 6 | 6.44 | Quercetin 3-O-(6″-rhamnosyl)glucoside (Rutin)a | C27H29O16– | 609.14611 | 609.14545 | 1.08 | 343 (5), | 273 (25), 257 (20), | 151 (100) | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 7 | 6.83 | Kaempferol 7-O-(6″-rhamnosyl)hexoside | C27H29O15– | 593.15119 | 593.15015 | 1.75 | 327 (10), 286 (20), | 267 (40), | 255 (10), 239 (30), 229 (100), 163 (40) | Hoffmann and Harrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 8 | 6.92 | Isorhamnetin 3-O-(6″-rhamnosyl)glucoside (Narcissin)a | C28H31O16– | 623.16176 | 623.16077 | 1.59 | 316 (15), 315 (100), 300 (30), 271 (20), 255 (10) | 301 (5), | 272 (100), 271(90), 255 (50), 243 (10), 166 (5) | Hoffmann and Harrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 9 | 7.00 | Apigenin 8- | C27H27O14– | 575.14063 | 575.14032 | 0.54 | 557 (10), 513 (15), | 341 (10), | 283 (100) | — |
|
| ||||||||||
| 10 | 7.00 | Spinacetin 3-O-(6″-rhamnosyl)hexoside | C29H33O17– | 653.17232 | 653.17206 | 0.40 | 346 (20), |
| 315 (10), 302 (100), 287 (30), 273 (5), 166 (5) | Hoffmann and Harrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 11 | 7.11 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer 1 | C25H23O12– | 515.11950 | 515.11975 | -0.49 |
|
| 173 (95), 171 (50), 127 (90), 111 (30), 85 (100) | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 12 | 7.20 | Isorhamnetin 3-O-glucosidea | C22H21O12– | 477.10385 | 477.10339 | 0.96 | 357 (15), |
| 283 (5), 272 (100), 271 (60), 255 (40), 243 (10) | Hoffmann and Harrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 13 | 7.25 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer 2 | C25H23O12– | 515.11950 | 515.11932 | 0.35 |
|
| 173 (80), 171 (20), 127 (80), 111 (20), 85 (100) | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 14 | 7.28 | Spinacetin 3-O-hexoside | C23H23O13– | 507.11441 | 507.11395 | 0.91 | 492 (60), |
| — | Hoffmann and Harrmann, [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 15 | 7.43 | Chrysoeriol 7-O-hexoside | C22H21O11− | 461.10894 | 461.10904 | −0.22 | 446 (10), 300 (10), |
| 256 (100) | Benyahia et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 16 | 7.50 | Rosmarinic acida | C18H15O8– | 359.07724 | 359.07672 | 1.45 | 223 (10), 197 (30), 179 (40), |
| 105 (100) | Sahin et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 17 | 9.52 | Apigenina | C15H9O5− | 269.04554 | 269.04529 | 0.93 | 269 (60), | 210 (10), 197 (50), 196 (20), 183 (40), | — | Olennikov et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 18 | 9.73 | Chrysoeriola | C16H11O6– | 299.05611 | 299.05576 | 1.17 | 285 (10), | 284 (20), | 256 (40), 228 (100), 160 (40) | Olennikov et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 19 | 11.43 | Eupatorin | C18H15O7– | 343.08233 | 343.08160 | 2.13 | 329 (10), | 314 (10), | 298 (100), 285 (10), 270 (15) | Rashid et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 20 | 11.67 | Casticin | C19H17O8– | 373.09289 | 373.09250 | 1.05 | 359 (10), |
| 328 (100), 315 (15), 300 (30), 299 (20), 284 (10) | Han et al., [ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 21 | 11.75 | Kaempferidea | C16H11O6– | 299.05611 | 299.05573 | 1.27 | 285 (10), | 255 (20), 240 (15), 228 (20), 164 (25), | 106 (100), 83 (10), 65 (5) | Lai et al., [ |
aConfirmed using available standards, all the other compounds were identified based on HRMS data. Bold numbers are peaks which were further fragmented in MS3 and MS4 experiment.
Antibacterial activity of A. absinthium L. ethanolic extract.
| Bacteria |
| Streptomycin ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 12.5 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 12.5 | 25 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 6.2 |
|
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 6.2 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 12.5 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 12.5 | 25 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 6.2 |
|
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 6.2 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 14.0 | 28.0 |
|
| 0.2 | 0.5 | 6.2 | 12.5 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 7.6 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
|
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 37.5 | 75.0 |
| MRSA (IBRS MRSA 011) | 4.0 | 8.0 | 100 | >100 |
|
| 4.0 | 8.0 | 50.0 | 100 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 37.5 | 75 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.0 | 25.0 | 50.0 |
|
| 2.0 | 4.0 | 37.5 | 75.0 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 20.0 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
|
| 4.0 | 8.0 | 100 | >100 |
|
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 50.0 | 100 |
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration and MBC: minimal bactericidal concentration. Results are in mg/mL.
Figure 1Destabilization of C. albicans 475/15 membrane after treatment with A. absinthium (MIC, 0.5 mg/mL) for 30 min detected by (a) crystal violet uptake (%) and (b) leakage of nucleic acids (260 nm) and proteins (280 nm). The error bars indicate standard deviations. The asterisks represent statistical significance (p < 0.05; p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Percentage of inhibition of fungal and bacterial biofilm formation after treatment with A. absinthium in range of concentration 0.125 mg/mL–1 mg/mL. The error bars indicate standard deviations. The asterisks represent statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Estimated inhibition (%) of exopolysaccharide biofilm matrix content by congo red binding assay determined using C. albicans 475/15 biofilm after treatment with A. absinthium compared to commercial antifungal drug ketoconazole. The error bars indicate standard deviations. Statistical difference was not significant.
Figure 4Cytotoxicity of A. absinthium alcoholic extract towards (a) HGF-1 cells and (b) HaCaT cell line, represented as relative growth rates (%) at different concentrations of the extract. The error bars indicate standard deviations among three independent replicates.
Figure 5Fragmentation pathway of compound 9 (apigenin 8-C-[6“-(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl)]hexoside).