| Literature DB >> 31450704 |
Elena-Alina Moacă1, Ioana Zinuca Pavel2, Corina Danciu3, Zorin Crăiniceanu4, Daliana Minda2, Florina Ardelean5, Diana Simona Antal5, Roxana Ghiulai6, Andreea Cioca7, Mihnea Derban7, Sebastian Simu8, Raul Chioibaş9, Camelia Szuhanek10, Cristina-Adriana Dehelean1.
Abstract
Artemisia species are used worldwide for their antioxidant, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. This research was designed to investigate the phytochemical profile of two ethanolic extracts obtained from leaves and stems of A. absinthium L. as well as the biological potential (antioxidant activity, cytotoxic, anti-migratory and anti-inflammatory properties). Both plant materials showed quite similar thermogravimetric, FT-IR phenolic profile (high chlorogenic acid) with mild antioxidant capacity [ascorbic acid (0.02-0.1) > leaves (0.1-2.0) > stem (0.1-2.0)]. Alcoholic extracts from these plant materials showed a cytotoxic effect against A375 (melanoma) and MCF7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and affected less the non-malignant HaCaT cells (human keratinocytes) at 72 h post-stimulation and this same trend was observed in the anti-migratory (A375, MCF7 > HaCat) assay. Lastly, extracts ameliorated the pro-inflammatory effect of TPA (12-o-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate) in mice ears, characterized by a diffuse neutrophil distribution with no exocytosis or micro-abscesses.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisia absinthium L.; HaCaT cells; antioxidants; cytotoxicity; inflammation; melanoma and breast cancer cell line; total phenolic content
Year: 2019 PMID: 31450704 PMCID: PMC6749517 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24173087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1A—TG-DSC curves of A. absinthium leaves extract, B—TG-DSC curves of A. absinthium stems extract, C—FT-IR spectra of A. absinthium leaves extract, D—FT-IR spectra of A. absinthium stems extract.
Peak values and functional groups of A. absinthium leaves and stems extracts in the spectrum.
| Characteristic Absorptions [cm−1] | Functional Group | Bond |
|---|---|---|
| 3365.78/3381.21 | Amines, amide, alcohol | N-H stretching O-H stretch (H-bonded) |
| 2926.01/2924.09; 2852.72 | Alkanes | C-H strech |
| 1616.35/1600.92 | Amide | N-H bending |
| 1516.05/1506.41 | Nitro compounds | N-O asymmetric strech |
| 1456.26 | Aromatics | C=C stretch (in ring) |
| 1398.39/1384.89 | Alkanes | -C-H bending |
| 1338.60/- | Amines | C-N strech |
| 1265.30/1269.16; 1238.30 | Acids | C-O strech |
| 1068.56/1068.56; 1124.50 | Alcohols | C-O stretch |
| 866.04/912.33 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
| 817.82/817.82 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
| 769.60/767.67 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
| 655.80/657.73 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
| 617.22/611.43 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
| 534.28/534.28 | Alkenes | =C-H bending |
Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the ethanolic wormwood extracts.
| Extract | Total Phenolic Content (mg GAE/g Extract) | Total Flavonoid Content (mg CE/g Extract) |
|---|---|---|
| Leaves extract | 54.68 ± 1.93 | 43.08 ± 2.47 |
| Stems extract | 44.15 ± 1.12 | 34.14 ± 2.16 |
Polyphenolic content of extracts analysed by LC-MS.
| Compound Name | Rt (min) | [M − H+]+ ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Gentisic acid | 2.67 | 153 | ND | NQ |
| 2. | Chlorogenic acid | 6.45 | 353 | 1.94 | 2.03 |
| 3. | Caffeic acid | 6.97 | 179 | NQ | NQ |
| 4. | 10.56 | 163 | NQ | ND | |
| 5. | Isoquercitrin | 22.50 | 463 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| 6. | Rutin | 23.01 | 609 | 0.08 | 0.55 |
| 7. | Quercitrin | 26.18 | 447 | 0.11 | 0.05 |
| 8. | Luteolin | 32.78 | 285 | NQ | ND |
| 9. | Apigenin | 36.91 | 269 | NQ | ND |
Notes: ND—not detected, below the limit of detection; NQ—not quantified, below the limit of quantification.
Figure 2The time dependent inhibition percentage of A. absinthium extracts: A—A. absinthium stock solutions based on leaves and stems vs. ascorbic acid; B—extracts of A. absinthium leaves vs. ascorbic acid; C—extracts of A. absinthium stems vs. ascorbic acid.
The inhibition percentage of A. absinthium extracts obtained from leaves and stems, as compared to the inhibition percentage of ascorbic acid 1.
| Ascorbic Acid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration [mg/mL] | % Inhibition | Concentration [mg/mL] | % Inhibition | Concentration [mg/mL] | % Inhibition |
| 0.1 | 94.88 ± 0.029 | 2 | 53.11 ± 0.014 | 2 | 55.77 ± 0.054 |
| 0.08 | 95.47 ± 0.001 | 1.4 | 49.47 ± 0.015 | 1.4 | 56.84 ± 0.026 |
| 0.06 | 95.06 ± 0.001 | 0.7 | 47.32 ± 0.026 | 0.7 | 48.79 ± 0.015 |
| 0.04 | 94.85 ± 0.0015 | 0.2 | 32.61 ± 0.020 | 0.2 | 37.71 ± 0.019 |
| 0.02 | 83.19 ± 0.005 | 0.1 | 31.15 ± 0.021 | 0.1 | 34.02 ± 0.056 |
1 The results are expressed as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3In vitro cytotoxicity assessment of A. absinthium leaves and stems ethanolic extracts (50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL) on a non-tumor cell line–HaCaT–human keratinocytes and on two human tumor cell lines A375—melanoma cells and MCF7–breast adenocarcinoma cells at 72 h post-stimulation by the means of Alamar blue assay. The results are expressed as cell viability percentage (%) related to Control (cells stimulated with ultrapure water). The data represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments. Comparison among the groups was performed using the One-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-test. (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
IC50 values and selectivity of A. absinthium leaves and stems extracts (cancer cells vs. non-malignant HaCaT cells—human keratinocytes) at 72 h post-stimulation.
| Extract | HaCaT IC50 (µg/mL) | A375 IC50 (µg/mL) | MCF7 IC50 (µg/mL) | SI * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 397.7 ± 7.2 | 295.4 ± 7.1 | - | 1.35 |
|
| 361.8 ± 9.3 | 312 ± 3.4 | - | 1.16 |
* Selectivity index (SI) is calculated as the ratio between the IC50 values; IC50 [non-malignant HaCaT]/IC50 [tumor cell line]. The data represent the mean values ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 4The migratory potential of HaCat, A375 and MCF7 cells following treatment with A. absinthium leaves and stems ethanolic extract (50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL). Images were taken by light microscopy at 10× magnification (the scale bars represent 100 μm). The bar graphs are expressed as percentage of scratch closure after 24 h compared to the initial surface. Comparison among the groups was performed using the One-way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett’s post-test. (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 vs. Control-cells stimulated with ultrapure water).
Figure 5Histological aspects of the skin, H&E stain, A: Control group—with no intervention, magnification ×10; B: Acetone group showing edema, magnification ×10; C: TPA group showing abundant inflammation in the entire dermis with abscess formation, magnification ×20; D: TPA + indomethacin group depicting mild inflammation, magnification ×20; E: topical application of A. absinthium leaves extract indicating moderate inflammation and moderate interstitial edema, magnification ×20; F: treatment with A. absinthium stems extract having a reduced number of neutrophils and thick collagen fibers in dermis, magnification ×20.
Figure 6Schematic protocol of A. absinthium L. ethanolic extracts preparation.
In vivo experimental design for the local acute inflammation model.
| Group No. | Group Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | With no intervention |
| 2 | Control + Acetone | Acetone (solvent for TPA)—20 μL/mouse ear |
| 3 | TPA | TPA solution (20 μL/mouse ear) |
| 4 | TPA + Indomethacin | Indomethacine cream (4%) was topically applied after the TPA solution |
| 5 | TPA + | |
| 6 | TPA + |