| Literature DB >> 34333556 |
Eric L Wald1, Colleen M Badke2, Lauren K Hintz3, Michael Spewak4, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto5.
Abstract
Vitamins are essential micronutrients with key roles in many biological pathways relevant to sepsis. Some of these relevant biological mechanisms include antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, protein and hormone synthesis, energy generation, and regulation of gene transcription. Moreover, relative vitamin deficiencies in plasma are common during sepsis and vitamin therapy has been associated with improved outcomes in some adult and pediatric studies. High-dose intravenous vitamin C has been the vitamin therapy most extensively studied in adult patients with sepsis and septic shock. This includes three randomized control trials (RCTs) as monotherapy with a total of 219 patients showing significant reduction in organ dysfunction and lower mortality when compared to placebo, and five RCTs as a combination therapy with thiamine and hydrocortisone with a total of 1134 patients showing no difference in clinical outcomes. Likewise, the evidence for the role of other vitamins in sepsis remains mixed. In this narrative review, we present the preclinical, clinical, and safety evidence of the most studied vitamins in sepsis, including vitamin C, thiamine (i.e., vitamin B1), and vitamin D. We also present the relevant evidence of the other vitamins that have been studied in sepsis and critical illness in both children and adults, including vitamins A, B2, B6, B12, and E. IMPACT: Vitamins are key effectors in many biological processes relevant to sepsis. We present the preclinical, clinical, and safety evidence of the most studied vitamins in pediatric sepsis. Designing response-adaptive platform trials may help fill in knowledge gaps regarding vitamin use for critical illness and association with clinical outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34333556 PMCID: PMC8325544 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01673-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Res ISSN: 0031-3998 Impact factor: 3.756
Studies in critical illness using vitamin C as monotherapy.
| Study/design | Patient, | Protocol | Important clinical outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fowler et al. (2014);[ | Severe sepsis, | VitC 50 mg (low dose) or VitC 200 mg (high dose)/kg/24 h IV × 96 h vs. placebo | Treatment group experienced significant reductions in SOFA scores, CRP, and PCT compared to the control group |
| Zabet et al. (2019);[ | Surgical patients with septic shock requiring vasopressors, | VitC 25 mg/kg IV q6 h × 72 h vs. placebo | Mortality reduction; 14.3% mortality in treatment arm vs. 64.3% in placebo, Decreased vasopressor requirement in the treatment arm |
| Fowler et al.;[ | Sepsis and ARDS, | VitC 50 mg/kg IV q6 h × 96 h vs. placebo | Mortality reduction; 29.8% mortality in treatment arm vs. 46.3% in placebo, |
| Tanaka et al. (2000);[ | Severely burned patients (burn >30% BSA), | VitC 66 mg/kg/h IV in LR × 24 h vs. placebo | Decreased fluid requirements, edema, and weight gain in the treatment arm |
| Ahn et al. (2019);[ | Severe sepsis or septic shock requiring mechanical ventilation, | VitC 2 g IV q8 h until discharge from ICU vs. control | No difference in change in SOFA scores, mortality, or median time to shock reversal |
| Nakajima et al. (2019);[ | Severe burn patients (burn index ≥15), | VitC ≥10 g and <24 g IV or VitC ≥24 g IV | Mortality reduction; 45.9% mortality in ≥10 g treatment arm vs. 58.0% in the control arm ( |
VitC vitamin C, LR lactated ringers, PCT procalcitonin, RCT randomized control trial, ICU intensive care unit, [m]SOFA [modified] Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, BSA body surface area, CRP C-reactive protein.
Studies in critical illness using vitamin C in combination therapy
| Study/design | Patient, | Protocol | Important clinical outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathens et al. (2002);[ | Critically ill surgical patients, | VitC and alpha-tocopherol vs. placebo; VitC 1000 mg q8 h until discharge from ICU or 28 days (whichever was shorter) | Decreased multiple organ failure, reduction of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6; decreased ICU and hospital stay, and increased ventilator-free days in the treatment arm |
| Marik et al. (2017);[ | Severe sepsis or septic shock and PCT >2 ng/mL; | HAT therapy (HCT 50 mg q6 h × 7 d; VitC 1.5 g IV q6 h × 4 days or until ICU discharge, thiamine 200 mg q12 × 4 d) vs. control | Mortality reduction; 8.5% mortality in treatment arm vs. 40.4% in control arm, |
| Fujii et al. (2020) VITAMINS trial;[ | Septic shock, | HAT therapy (identical to Marik) vs. hydrocortisone alone | No difference in 28- or 90-day mortality or vasopressor-free days |
| Moskowitz et al. (2020) ACTS trial;[ | Septic shock, | HAT therapy vs. placebo; HCT 50 mg, VitC 1.5 g IV, thiamine 100 mg q6 4 d | No difference in SOFA score over 72 h, the incidence of kidney failure, 30-day mortality |
| Iglesias et al. (2020) ORANGES trial;[ | Sepsis and septic shock; | HAT therapy (identical to Marik) vs. placebo | Vasopressor time (resolution of shock) reduced in HAT arm (27 ± 22 vs. 53 ± 38 h, |
| Chang et al. (2020) HYVCTTSSS trial;[ | Sepsis and septic shock; | HAT therapy (identical to Marik) vs. placebo | Terminated early (underpowered). No mortality benefit. Improvement of 72-h change in SOFA score ( |
| Wald et al. (2020);[ | Septic shock requiring vasopressors; | HAT therapy arm vs. hydrocortisone arm vs. control arm (standard care); HCT 50 mg/m2/day divided every 6 hours VitC 30 mg/kg/dose q6 h × 4 d up to 1500 mg/dose, thiamine 4 mg/kg/day divided BID | Mortality reduction, HAT therapy vs. matched untreated controls at 30 days (9 vs. 28%, |
| Sevransky et al. (2021) VICTAS trial;[ | Septic shock, | HAT therapy vs. placebo; HCT 50 mg, VitC 1.5 g IV, thiamine 100 mg q6 4 d | No increase in ventilator- and vasopressor-free days within 30 days. However, the trial was terminated early and may have been underpowered to detect a clinically important difference |
HAT hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, thiamine therapy, HCT hydrocortisone, VitC vitamin C, LR lactated ringers, PCT procalcitonin, RCT, randomized control trial, ICU intensive care unit, [m]SOFA [modified] Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, BSA body surface area, CRP C-reactive protein.
Studies of thiamine in critical illness.
| Study/design | Patient, | Protocol | Important clinical outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holmberg et al. 2018;[ | Patients with alcohol-use disorders and septic shock, | Thiamine therapy 100 mg IV (nonuniform dosing/duration) vs. control | Mortality benefit in patients receiving thiamine, 15/34 (44%) died, compared to 15/19 (79%) of those not receiving thiamine, |
| Donnino et al. 2016;[ | Septic shock and elevated lactate, | Thiamine 200 mg IV BID × 7 days vs. control | No difference in the primary outcome of lactate levels at 24 h or secondary outcomes, including time to shock reversal, the severity of illness and mortality. Decrease in mortality over time in those receiving thiamine in the pre-defined thiamine-deficient subgroup ( |
| Moskowitz et al. 2017;[ | 70 patients analyzed | Thiamine vs. control; 200 mg IV BID × 7 days | Lower serum creatinine levels and a lower rate of progression to RRT than patients randomized to placebo |
RCT randomized controlled trial, BID twice daily, RRT renal replacement therapy.
Studies of vitamin D therapy in critical illness.
| Study/design | Patient, | Intervention/protocol | Important clinical outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Han et al. (2016),[ | Mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients, | Vitamin D3 50,000 vs. 100,000 IU enterally vs. placebo | Increased plasma 25(OH)D concentrations; a significant decrease in hospital LOS in the 250,000 and the 500,000 IU vitamin D3 group, compared to the placebo group (25 ± 14 and 18 ± 11 days compared to 36 ± 19 days; |
| Amrein et al. (2014) VITdAL trial,[ | Medical/surgical ICU critically ill adult white patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤20 ng/mL), | Vitamin D3 540,000 IU enterally × 1, followed by 90,000 IU monthly for 5 months vs. placebo. | No reduction in hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, or 6-month mortality |
| Leaf et al. (2014),[ | Adults with severe sepsis, septic shock, | 2 μg 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) × single dose vs. placebo | No difference in plasma cathelicidin protein levels, inflammatory cytokines or markers of kidney injury |
| Lan et al. (2020),[ | 9 RCTs, 1867 patients | Varying protocols with different routes of administration | No difference in 28-day mortality between the vitamin D supplementation and placebo groups (20.4 vs. 21.7%, OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46–1.15; |
RCT randomized controlled trial, ICU intensive care unit, LOS length of stay, IU international units.