| Literature DB >> 34314900 |
R Conde1, R Laires1, L G Gonçalves1, A Rizvi2, C Barroso3, M Villar4, R Macedo5, M J Simões5, S Gaddam6, P Lamosa1, L Puchades-Carrasco7, A Pineda-Lucena8, A B Patel9, S C Mande10, S Banerjee2, M Matzapetakis1, A V Coelho11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a disease with worldwide presence and a major cause of death in several developing countries. Current diagnostic methodologies often lack specificity and sensitivity, whereas a long time is needed to obtain a conclusive result.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Diagnosis; NMR Metabolomics; Serum; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34314900 PMCID: PMC9486122 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.07.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed J ISSN: 2319-4170 Impact factor: 7.892
Cohort characterization.
| Tuberculosis Patients | Latent | Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary | Extra-pulmonary | |||
| Total individuals (n) | 25 | 12 | 10 | 57 |
| Age (A/B/C) | 10/12/2 | 3/2/7 | 2/5/3 | 23/28/7 |
| Gender (F/M) | 7/17 | 9/3 | 8/2 | 29/29 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) (L/N/H) | 9/14/1 | 0/5/6 | 0/7/3 | 3/41/12 |
| Smoking habits (Y/N/Ex) | 6/8/5 | 0/8/0 | 0/4/0 | 11/32/5 |
Categorization for age is < 30 (A), 30–50 (B) and >50 years (C), for BMI is low (L), normal (N) and high (H), and for present smoking habits yes (Y), non (N), ex-smoker (Ex). A discrepancy between total number of individuals for the several criteria is due to missing information.
Fig. 1Discrimination of TB Patients using quantified serum metabolites. (A) Principal Component Analysis score plot using serum metabolites of the three groups: Control, Patient and Latent. In the lower panels is presented the PLS-DA model for the Controls and Patients comparison; (B) score plot of the two first components (acc = 94%, R2 = 0,75, Q2 = 0.51) and (C) loadings plot with the metabolites colored by its variance importance in projection (VIP) in the first component. Node color changes from blue to red with increasing VIP. Metabolites with VIP value > 1.5 are depicted in the plot.
Fig. 2Serum metabolite concentrations significantly different between Controls and Patients comparison. Boxplots from Wilcox test (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Fig. 3Amino acid metabolic pathways are among the most altered in TB patients. Differential pathway analysis between Controls and TB Patients using metabolite levels by MetaboAnalyst. Depicted pathways have negative logarithm of p-value higher than 10 (y axis) and pathway impact above 0, or pathway impact higher than 0.5 (x axis). Node color changes from white to red with decreasing p-value; and node radius correlates with pathway impact values. Pathways are ordered by their respective p-values.
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve and Indian samples prediction, considering hypoxanthine, asparagine, mannose, aspartate, glutamate and inosine levels. (A) ROC analysis using Controls and Patients from the Portuguese cohort. (B) Prediction of the samples from the Indian cohort. In black the Portuguese samples and in red the Indian samples, filled and outline circles for Patients and Controls, respectively.
Fig. 5Biological relevance of biomarkers. Metabolites with differential amounts are underlined. The arrows on the right side of the name define their increased or decreased levels in Tuberculosis infection.