| Literature DB >> 36061860 |
Peerut Chienwichai1, Kathyleen Nogrado2, Phornpimon Tipthara3, Joel Tarning3,4, Yanin Limpanont5, Phiraphol Chusongsang5, Yupa Chusongsang5, Kanthi Tanasarnprasert5, Poom Adisakwattana6, Onrapak Reamtong2.
Abstract
Mekong schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease caused by blood flukes in the Lao People's Democratic Republic and in Cambodia. The standard method for diagnosis of schistosomiasis is detection of parasite eggs from patient samples. However, this method is not sufficient to detect asymptomatic patients, low egg numbers, or early infection. Therefore, diagnostic methods with higher sensitivity at the early stage of the disease are needed to fill this gap. The aim of this study was to identify potential biomarkers of early schistosomiasis using an untargeted metabolomics approach. Serum of uninfected and S. mekongi-infected mice was collected at 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-infection. Samples were extracted for metabolites and analyzed with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer. Metabolites were annotated with the MS-DIAL platform and analyzed with Metaboanalyst bioinformatic tools. Multivariate analysis distinguished between metabolites from the different experimental conditions. Biomarker screening was performed using three methods: correlation coefficient analysis; feature important detection with a random forest algorithm; and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Three compounds were identified as potential biomarkers at the early stage of the disease: heptadecanoyl ethanolamide; picrotin; and theophylline. The levels of these three compounds changed significantly during early-stage infection, and therefore these molecules may be promising schistosomiasis markers. These findings may help to improve early diagnosis of schistosomiasis, thus reducing the burden on patients and limiting spread of the disease in endemic areas.Entities:
Keywords: heptadecanoyl ethanolamide; metabolomics; picrotin; schistosomiasis; theophylline
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36061860 PMCID: PMC9433908 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.910177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1Number of features identified from metabolomic analysis of mouse serum after S. mekongi infection.
Figure 2Multivariate analysis of metabolomic data. Interactive 3D-PCA of features in positive mode (A) and negative mode (B). PLS-DA of features in positive mode (C) and negative mode (D).
Top 10 metabolites with the highest fold change at 2, 4, and, 8 weeks after S. mekongi infection.
| No. | Metabolite name | Adducted form | Mode | Retention time | m/z | Fold -change |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top-10 metabolites with highest fold change from 2 weeks after infection | |||||||
| 1 | N-arachinoyl-5-hydroxytryptamide | [M+H]+ | Positive | 11.71657 | 471.396 | 153.77 | 0.0003 |
| 2 | Lapachol | [M-H]- | Negative | 8.346058 | 241.0877 | 153.00 | 0.009 |
| 3 | (1S)-1,5-anhydro-1-[4,5,10-trihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-9-anthryl]-D-glucitol | [M+3H]+ | Positive | 13.6515 | 441.1258 | 141.75 | 0.003 |
| 4 | Glabrol | [M+H]+ | Positive | 13.93778 | 415.1875 | 133.63 | 0.002 |
| 5 | 13-dodecan-2-yl-6-(1-hydroxyethyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-12-methyl-9-propan-2-yl-1-oxa-4,7,10-triazacyclotridecane-2,5,8,11-tetrone | [M+H]+ | Positive | 15.37448 | 559.4083 | 116.04 | 2.61E-07 |
| 6 | Onopordopicrin | [M+2ACN+H]+ | Positive | 14.36326 | 366.1922 | 114.70 | 0.0009 |
| 7 | 5-[5-hydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)pentyl]-8a-(hydroxymethyl)-5,6-dimethyl-3,4,4a,6,7,8-hexahydronaphthalene-1-carboxylic acid | [M+H-2H2O]+ | Positive | 13.09474 | 377.2274 | 100.77 | 0.004 |
| 8 | 3,5,7,8-tetramethoxy-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)chromen-4-one | [M+K]+ | Positive | 14.59533 | 471.1048 | 98.22 | 0.0001 |
| 9 | 3,5,7,8-tetramethoxy-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)chromen-4-one | [M+2Na-H]+ | Positive | 14.66728 | 471.1013 | 93.95 | 0.004 |
| 10 | 3-Buten-2-one, 4-[4-(beta-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexylidene]- | [M+H]+ | Positive | 14.59533 | 409.1857 | 86.94 | 8.54E-05 |
| Top-10 metabolites with highest fold change from 4 weeks after infection | |||||||
| 1 | Lapachol | [M-H]- | Negative | 8.346058 | 241.0877 | 191.41 | 0.009 |
| 2 | Gibberellin A9 | [M-H]- | Negative | 7.290267 | 315.1576 | 41.83 | 0.008 |
| 3 | 5-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-10-(2-methylbut-3-en-2-yl)pyrano[3,2-g]chromen-8-one | [M-H]- | Negative | 7.796092 | 311.1892 | 34.05 | 0.005 |
| 4 | Picrotin | [M+FA-H]- | Negative | 1.181697 | 309.0999 | 30.00 | 9.57E-12 |
| 5 | Picrotin | [M+CH3
| Negative | 6.826533 | 309.1021 | 22.35 | 1.44E-06 |
| 6 | 1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydro-9-hydroxy-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-, (1S,9R)- | [M+Li]+ | Positive | 8.561492 | 299.201 | 22.13 | 0.005 |
| 7 | Phosphatidylserine | [M-H]- | Negative | 8.783392 | 808.5076 | 14.02 | 0.009 |
| 8 | Fragilin | [M+Br]- | Negative | 1.185329 | 317.014 | 14.02 | 4.23E-11 |
| 9 | 2,3,4’-Trihydroxy-4-Methoxybenzophenone | [M+Na-2H]- | Negative | 1.181697 | 259.0627 | 12.12 | 3.01E-08 |
| 10 | 4-[(2S)-2-hydroxy-3-methyl-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxybutoxy]furo[3,2-g]chromen-7-one | [M-H]- | Negative | 10.49793 | 447.1328 | 10.87 | 0.009 |
| Top-10 metabolites with highest fold change from 8 weeks after infection | |||||||
| 1 | 1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic acid, 1,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10a-octahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-9-oxo- | [M+H]+ | Positive | 8.729832 | 315.197 | 39.77 | 4.13E-11 |
| 2 | 8-{(1S,5R)-4-Oxo-5-[(2Z)-2-penten-1-yl]-2-cyclopenten-1-yl}octanoic acid | [M+H]+ | Positive | 8.8087 | 315.1931 | 31.88 | 0.008 |
| 3 | Kahweol | [M+Na]+ | Positive | 8.7304 | 337.1788 | 31.42 | 2.64E-08 |
| 4 | GR 113808 | [M+H]+ | Positive | 13.60072 | 394.1867 | 30.34 | 1.79E-08 |
| 5 | [(E)-3-acetyloxy-7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-7-(6-oxo-2,3-dihydropyran-2-yl)hept-4-en-2-yl] acetate | [M+H]+ | Positive | 8.14756 | 395.0924 | 30.12 | 1.27E-11 |
| 6 | Progesterone | [M-H]- | Negative | 10.83639 | 313.2149 | 24.88 | 0.0099 |
| 7 | Epiandrosterone | [M+2ACN+H]+ | Positive | 10.4684 | 255.2101 | 22.24 | 5.37E-09 |
| 8 | Acetamide, N-[(Z)-2-(acetylamino)-1-[(7-methoxy-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)methyl]ethenyl]-N-(2-oxo-3-phenylpropyl)- | [M+2K-H]+ | Positive | 10.44938 | 439.1872 | 21.34 | 1.82E-06 |
| 9 | (2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-(3-benzoyloxy-2-hydroxypropoxy)-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid | [M+H]+ | Positive | 8.258067 | 395.0909 | 17.12 | 0.002 |
| 10 | Norethindrone | [M-C6H10O4+H]+ | Positive | 8.572973 | 299.2005 | 16.39 | 7.46E-13 |
"+" positively charged ion, "−" negatively charged ion.
Figure 3Pathway analysis of significantly altered metabolites at 2 weeks (A), 4 weeks (B), and 8 weeks post-infection (C).
Figure 4Top 25 metabolites with highest/lowest correlation coefficient from Pearson’s correlation test.
Figure 5Top 15 metabolites with highest mean decrease accuracy from feature important detection with random forest algorithm.
Metabolites identified as significant in ROC curve analysis at all infection time-points.
| No. | Metabolite name | 2-weeks post-infection | 4-weeks post-infection | 8-weeks post-infection | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | t-test | Log2 Fold change | AUC | t-test | Log2 Fold change | AUC | t-test | Log2 Fold change | ||
| 1 | Picrotin | 1 | 0.0009 | 2.24 | 1 | 2.4141E-05 | 4.91 | 1 | 6.1898E-06 | 4.27 |
| 2 | Heptadecanoyl Ethanolamide | 1 | 0.0004 | 1.82 | 1 | 0.0002 | 2.48 | 1 | 1.1391E-05 | 2.65 |
| 3 | Heptadecanoyl Ethanolamide | 1 | 0.0004 | 1.75 | 1 | 0.0004 | 2.54 | 1 | 0.0002 | 2.45 |
| 4 | Theophylline | 0.92 | 0.006 | -0.73 | 0.92 | 0.009 | -0.94 | 1 | 0.0005 | -0.89 |
Figure 6Levels of Heptadecanoyl Ethanolamide with [M+H]+ adduct, Heptadecanoyl Ethanolamide with [M+2H+Na]+ adduct, Picrotin, and Theophylline at all time-points. * indicates statistical significance with p-value < 0.05. ** indicates statistical significance with p-value < 0.01.