Literature DB >> 34313893

Bacterial reduction effect of four different dental lasers on titanium surfaces in vitro.

W Patrick Misischia1,2, Pinelopi Xenoudi1,3, Raymond A Yukna4,5, Michael J Schurr6.   

Abstract

Compare the effectiveness of selected dental lasers for decontamination of machined titanium surfaces in vitro. Seventy-two sterile machined surface titanium discs were individually inoculated with strains of Streptococcus mutans (Sm), Streptococcus oralis (So), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), or all three bacteria together (MIX) at 34.0° C, 20.8% O2 and 5% CO2 for 12 h. After incubation, the discs were divided into six groups: 1) no treatment, 2) 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), and 3) 10,600 CO2, 4) 810 nm diode, 5) 2780 nm Er,Cr:YSGG, 6) 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser groups. After treatment, any remaining viable bacteria were liberated from the discs via sonication, transferred onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates for culturing, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. There were statistically significantly differences (SSD) (p < 0.01) in bacterial reduction of discs individually inoculated with Aa between the Er,Cr:YSGG and Nd:YAG lasers. There was also a SSD (p < 0.01) lower effect with the MIX with the Er,Cr:YSGG compared with all other modalities. Bacterial reduction with the CO2 was better (p < 0.001) than treatment with CHX or the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on killing of So. Although all modalities of treatment showed a mean of 98% or greater viable bacterial reduction, the most consistent bacterial reduction of all titanium discs was with the Nd:YAG laser (100%).
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; Decontamination; Implant; Laser; Titanium

Year:  2021        PMID: 34313893     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03349-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  51 in total

1.  Subgingival microbiota in peri-implant mucosa lesions and adjacent teeth in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Javier E Botero; Ana M González; Ramiro A Mercado; Gilberto Olave; Adolfo Contreras
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part I: clinical outcome.

Authors:  Eugenio Romeo; Marco Ghisolfi; Nicola Murgolo; Matteo Chiapasco; Diego Lops; Giorgio Vogel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser irradiation with low pulse energy: a potential tool for the treatment of peri-implant disease.

Authors:  Rosalba Giannini; Massimo Vassalli; Flaminia Chellini; Lucia Polidori; Rosanna Dei; Marco Giannelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 4.  Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Teh Lee; Yen-Wen Huang; Liang Zhu; Robin Weltman
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Peri-implant health around screw-shaped c.p. titanium machined implants in partially edentulous patients with or without ongoing periodontitis.

Authors:  M Quirynen; W Peeters; I Naert; W Coucke; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Effect of six different peri-implantitis disinfection methods on in vivo human oral biofilm.

Authors:  Martin Gosau; Sebastian Hahnel; Frank Schwarz; Till Gerlach; Torsten E Reichert; Ralf Bürgers
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System.

Authors:  Ioannis K Karoussis; Giovanni E Salvi; Lisa J A Heitz-Mayfield; Urs Brägger; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  The Current Weight of Evidence of the Microbiologic Profile Associated With Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paula Juliana Pérez-Chaparro; Poliana Mendes Duarte; Jamil Awad Shibli; Sheyla Montenegro; Sílvia Lacerda Heluy; Luciene Cristina Figueiredo; Marcelo Faveri; Magda Feres
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  Ralf Bürgers; Till Gerlach; Sebastian Hahnel; Frank Schwarz; Gerhard Handel; Martin Gosau
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Formation of biofilm on various implant abutment materials.

Authors:  Nasrin Esfahanizadeh; Seyedeh Pegah Mirmalek; Abbas Bahador; Hamidreza Daneshparvar; Nasrin Akhoundi; Maryam Pourhajibagher
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.