Literature DB >> 34302030

Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.

Sang-Yeon Lee1,2, Young Seok Kim2, Hyung Dong Jo2, Yoonjoong Kim3, Marge Carandang4, Gene Huh2, Byung Yoon Choi5.   

Abstract

The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34302030     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94668-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  30 in total

1.  Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Angel Ramos-Macias; Stephen O'Leary; Angel Ramos-deMiguel; Christo Bester; Juan C Falcon-González
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Surgical Experience and Early Outcomes With a Slim Perimodiolar Electrode.

Authors:  David R Friedmann; Emily Kamen; Baishakhi Choudhury; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study.

Authors:  Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Hanna Matikka; Frank Risi; Sini Sipari; Teemu Koski; Tytti Willberg; Antti Lehtimäki; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Heikki Löppönen; Aarno Dietz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Thomas Wesarg; Alexander Mewes; Silke Helbig; Joachim Hornung; Thomas Lenarz; Robert Briggs; Mathieu Marx; Angel Ramos; Timo Stöver; Bernard Escudé; Chris J James; Antje Aschendorff
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-11-22

5.  Matched Cohort Comparison Indicates Superiority of Precurved Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Robert J Yawn; Ashley M Nassiri; Robert T Dwyer; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Domenico Cuda; Alessandra Murri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Early Outcomes With a Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.

Authors:  Jonathan L McJunkin; Nedim Durakovic; Jacques Herzog; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes.

Authors:  Srijata Chakravorti; Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jacob B Hunter; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder; Matt M Dedmon; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; George B Wanna
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.