Literature DB >> 30465637

Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.

Matthias Hey1, Thomas Wesarg2, Alexander Mewes1, Silke Helbig3, Joachim Hornung4, Thomas Lenarz5, Robert Briggs6, Mathieu Marx7, Angel Ramos8, Timo Stöver3, Bernard Escudé9, Chris J James7,10, Antje Aschendorff2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report on electrode array measurements for the Nucleus® CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode device including: ECAP thresholds, electrode impedances, and psychophysical comfort levels, as well as speech perception results pre- and post-operatively and standardized evaluations of quality of life.
METHODS: Forty-four subjects were implanted with the CI532. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and impedances were measured using automatic Neural Response Telemetry intra-operatively, at activation and at six months post implant. Pre- and post-operative measures of words in quiet and sentences in noise were made in multiple languages. Quality of life was assessed using The Speech Spatial Qualities questionnaire (SSQ) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI).
RESULTS: Intra-operative ECAP thresholds were recorded successfully from 90% of electrodes tested. ECAP thresholds varied across the array and a post-hoc Dunn's test showed that median thresholds for electrodes E1-E13 were significantly greater than those for E17-E22 (all P < 0.001). Impedances increased significantly between surgery and activation. Speech recognition scores for words in quiet and sentences in noise showed a significant improvement for the group at six months, when using the cochlear implant, compared with pre-operative performance (P < 0.001). There was a significant increase compared to pre-operative ratings for all sections of the SSQ at six months post activation (P < 0.001). The GBI gave scores significantly above zero for the 'general' subscale and total score.
CONCLUSION: Objective ECAP and impedance measures for this new electrode array were as expected and similar to results reported for other array types. Speech perception and quality of life improved significantly following implantation. (Registered as NCT02392403 on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Expanding criteria; Hearing preservation; Neural response; Perimodiolar

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30465637     DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2018.1544684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  8 in total

1.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes Using a Precurved Electrode Array Inserted With an External Sheath.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; Robert J Yawn; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Matthew R O'Malley; Marc L Bennett; Robert F Labadie; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Jin Hee Han; Marge Carandang; Yun Jung Bae; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effect of initial switch-on within 24 hours of cochlear implantation using slim modiolar electrodes.

Authors:  Woongsang Sunwoo; Hyoung Won Jeon; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Electrophysiological measurements with electrode types of different perimodiolar properties and the same cochlear implant electronics - a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  A Perenyi; F Toth; B Dimak; R Nagy; P Schoerg; J Jori; J G Kiss; G Sprinzl; M Csanady; L Rovo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-09-06

6.  Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.

Authors:  Matthias Hey; Nicole Neben; Timo Stöver; Uwe Baumann; Alexander Mewes; Tim Liebscher; Mark Schüssler; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Wesarg; Andreas Büchner; Paula Greenham; Ulrich Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Young Seok Kim; Hyung Dong Jo; Yoonjoong Kim; Marge Carandang; Gene Huh; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of hearing preservation in adults with a slim perimodiolar electrode.

Authors:  Sonja Ludwig; Niklas Riemann; Stefan Hans; Florian Christov; Johannes Maximilian Ludwig; Judith Saxe; Diana Arweiler-Harbeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.