EQ-5D-Y Population Norms for Japanese Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at establishing population norms of EQ-5D-Y in Japan by a nationwide large sample survey.
METHODS: We performed a door-to-door survey by visiting the homes of children/adolescents aged 8-15 years selected by random sampling. The planned sample size was 3600 from 100 districts in Japan. Children/adolescents were asked to respond to the EQ-5D-Y instrument, and their parents, to background questions on themselves and their children. Summary statistics by age/sex were calculated to obtain the Japanese population norms. A multiple linear regression model was used to examine the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index and their parents' demographic factors, the children/adolescents' diseases/symptoms and the family environment.
RESULTS: We collected 3636 responses from 100 districts. The overall EQ-5D-Y index values (all sexes, ages) ranged from 0.90 to 0.95. The percentage of respondents reporting full health ranged from 40 to 60%. In regard to the influence of the children/adolescents' diseases/symptoms on disutility, developmental disability showed the largest disutility values of 0.090. Sleeplessness and body pain were the symptoms that exerted the greatest influence on the EQ-5D-Y index; the effect sizes ranged from - 0.030 to - 0.098 for sleeplessness, and from - 0.023 to - 0.079 for body pain. The EQ-5D-Y index of children/adolescents with parents who reported severe stress was lower by 0.072 (p < 0.001), as compared with that of children/adolescents with parents reporting no stress.
CONCLUSIONS: Population norms of EQ-5D-Y were established for the first time. We also clarified the relationship between the EQ-5D-Y index value and the children/adolescents' diseases/symptoms and the family environment.

Key Points

Introduction

A number of preference-based measures (PBMs) have been developed for children/adolescents, such as the Child Health Utility 9 dimensions (CHU-9D) [1], EQ-5D-Y [2], Health Utilities Index (HUI) [3], 16D [4] or 17D [5], and The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-6D) [6]. The EQ-5D-Y is a PBM that has been developed to measure the health states of children/adolescents (aged 8–15 years). It is a child-friendly version of and conceptually equivalent to the adult version of EQ-5D. The description of each item and the severity levels are adapted so as to make them more relevant to younger populations. After the new instrument is established, a value set is needed to convert the responses to the EQ-5D-Y to index values, which are anchored to 0 (death) or 1 (full health). Value sets of EQ-5D-Y have already been constructed in some countries, including Japan and Slovenia [7, 8], by valuation surveys based on an international common protocol [9]. The calculated index values can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses to estimate the quality-adjusted life-years by weighting obtained life-years.

To interpret the collected responses to PBMs, population norms are widely used in every country. Population norms are defined as “population reference data … for a specific country or international region” [10]. Population norms can be used as a reference for comparison with the obtained data. In addition, population norms can also be applied to cost-effectiveness analyses, by considering them as the values in people without any diseases or symptoms. Population norms of some PBMs have already been established in some countries. For example, the population norms of EQ-5D-5L have been reported for various countries or regions [11-26], including Japan [27, 28], although some reports only provide the distribution of the EQ-5D-5L responses without the index values. In contrast, population norms of PBMs for children/adolescents, including of the EQ-5D-Y, have not yet been established in any country. It is highly likely that the population norms of children/adolescents are different from those of adults.

The primary objective of this study was to establish the population norms of EQ-5D-Y, based on a nationwide random sample survey in Japan. The norms are presented by age and sex. A second objective was to investigate the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index values and diseases and symptoms in children/adolescents. The estimated coefficients can also be applied to cost-effectiveness analyses as disutility values of the patients with diseases or symptoms. A third objective was to explore the influence of the family environment (mental health of the parents and lifestyles of the children and adolescents) on the EQ-5D-Y index values. For children/adolescents, the family environment, including the parents’ life situation, may exert an influence on their health states; we explored the quantitative relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index values and the family environment to understand this influence. Through these objectives, we aim to promote a better understanding of the health states and quality of life of children/ adolescents.

Methods

Instruments

The EQ-5D-Y(-3L) is composed of five dimensions, each assessed at three levels: “mobility”, “looking after myself”, “doing usual activities”, “having pain or discomfort”, and “feeling worried, sad, or unhappy”. It covers the same basic dimensions of health as the adult version, EQ-5D, but the words and phrases are simplified to make the instrument more child friendly; it is thus slightly different from EQ-5D-3L or 5L [29, 30]. For example, the fifth item is changed from anxiety/depression into “feeling worried, sad, or unhappy”. EQ-5D-Y is designed for self-reporting by children/adolescents aged 8–15 years. It might also be possible to use the adult EQ-5D version for children/adolescents aged 12–15 years, although only the adult EQ-5D would be applicable to adolescents aged 16 years or over [31].

We also included in our survey some questions about diseases and symptoms that the children and adolescents might be experiencing. They were asked to select one of three categories (“none”, “occasionally”, and “frequently”) that best fitted their condition for the case of symptoms, and one of two categories (“no” and “yes”) for the case of diseases. Items on the demographic characteristics of the parents and family environment (stress level in the parents, degree of happiness of the parents, and lifestyle of the children and adolescents) were also added to the questionnaire. Although the children/adolescents themselves requested to provide the responses to the items on the EQ-5D-Y, the parents responded to the other questions.

Respondents

The respondents were children/adolescents aged 8–15 years and their parents. They were randomly sampled from 100 districts throughout Japan. The planned sample size was 3600, with an expected 225 subjects in every age and sex category. A door-to-door survey was conducted from January 2019 to March 2019. Investigators visited their addresses registered with the respective municipalities and distributed the questionnaire forms. Children/adolescents and their parents were asked to self-complete the instruments and respond to the questions. Children/adolescents who were hospitalized or admitted in orphanages were excluded. If the investigators obtained informed consent for participation, they returned to collect the forms after a few days and checked for missing data. If some responses were missing, the investigators asked them to respond to the missing items. These visits by the investigators were continued until the planned number of responses were collected from each district.

Sampling Method

The 100 districts (Cho-me, in Japanese) were selected as follows. First, the number of surveyed districts in each of the eight regions of Japan (Hokkaido, Tohoku, Kanto, Chubu, Kinki, Chugoku, Shikoku, and Kyushu) was determined in proportion to the population in each region. Then, for each region, the number of municipalities belonging to each stratum (i.e., prefectures in each region × three size categories [large cities, medium-sized cities, and small towns] of municipality) was calculated based on the population of the stratum. Surveyed municipalities were randomly selected according to the allocated number in each stratum. Next, the surveyed districts, which are located in the selected municipality, were randomly selected from all the districts in each municipality. Finally, respondents were also randomly sampled from each selected district, and stratified by sex and age. Individuals admitted to hospitals and nursing homes were excluded. Respondents were randomly sampled from the list of The Basic Resident Register. In Japan, each municipality has its own Basic Resident Register data, which include information such as the name, sex, address, and date of birth of individuals. We obtained permission from each municipality to use the data for our study.

Statistical Analysis

Responses to the EQ-5D-Y were converted into index values using the Japanese value sets [7]. Summary index values by age and sex were calculated to obtain the normative values for Japanese children/adolescents. The percentages of individuals who reported no problems with responding to the EQ-5D-Y were also computed.

A multiple linear regression model was used to examine the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index values and demographic factors. Age, sex, household income, employment status, education level, and marital status were included in the model. Next, we used three different multiple linear models. First, to estimate the size of the disutility associated with diseases, a linear regression model including the age category, sex, and disease was constructed to estimate the regression coefficients. Second, considering the effect of symptoms, a similar linear model was constructed, replacing diseases with symptoms. Finally, to consider the effects of the family environment of the children/adolescents (level of stress in the parents, degree of happiness of the parents, bedtime of the children/adolescents, and frequency at which they ate breakfast alone), a linear regression model including the age category, sex, and each factor related to every family environment was constructed. Using a robust standard error, the p value was calculated.

All the statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH-IBRA #12179).

Results

Response Rate and Demographic Factors

We collected 3636 responses from the 100 selected districts. The overall response rate was 45.2%, and the response rates by region were as follows; 43.8% from Hokkaido, 51.1% from Tohoku, 42.6% from Kanto, 49.6% from Chubu, 43.8% from Kinki, 51.0% from Chugoku, 51.8% from Shikoku, and 45.3% from Kyushu. The response rates did not largely differ among the regions. When the municipality in which the respondents lived were classified into three categories by the population (large cities, medium-sized cities, and small towns), the response rate was 43.6% from large cities, 45.8% from medium-sized cities, and 48.4% from small towns. Thus, the size of the city in which the respondents resided appeared to be related to the response rate. The demographic characteristics of the respondent children/adolescents and their parents are shown in Table 1. The population in each region as of October 2019, as estimated by the Japanese government, was 4.2% (Hokkaido), 6.9% (Tohoku), 34.4% (Kanto), 16.8% (Chubu), 17.7% (Kinki), 5.8% (Chugoku), 2.9% (Shikoku), and 11.3% (Kyushu). Our sampling did not involve a regional bias. The average household income of the whole population with children in 2018 was JPY 7.5 million (USD 69,000, 1 USD = 108 JPY, as of March 2021), with a median income of JPY 6.0 million (USD 56,000). Our data showed that the median category of household income was JPY 6.0 million to JPY 10 million per year, which was comparable to that of the overall Japanese population with children. In regard to other factors, as it was difficult to find Japanese government statistics on families with children and/or adolescents, no comparable data to those shown in Table 1 exist.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the respondents

	N	Percentage
Age, years
8	455	12.5
9	453	12.5
10	453	12.5
11	461	12.7
12	451	12.4
13	457	12.6
14	450	12.4
15	454	12.5
Sex
Male	1817	50.0
Female	1817	50.0
Region
Hokkaido	145	4.0
Tohoku	259	7.1
Kanto	1267	34.9
Chubu	545	15.0
Kinki	645	18.0
Chugoku	219	6.0
Shikoku	109	3.0
Kyushu	436	12.0
Household income (JPY 1 million)
< 1	27	0.7
1 < = < 2	78	2.1
2 < = < 4	395	10.9
4 < = < 6	925	25.5
6 < = < 10	1544	42.5
10 < = < 15	484	13.3
15 < = < 20	91	2.5
20 < =	35	1.0
Missing	55	1.5
Parents’ marital status
Married	3344	92.0
Others (unmarried, divorced)	290	8.0
Parents’ employment status
Both parents are working	2850	78.4
One of the parents is working	755	20.8
Neither parent is working	29	0.8
Parents’ history of education (university or graduate)
Both parents	609	16.8
Either parent	1017	28.0
Neither	1706	46.9
Missing	302	8.3

Population Norms of EQ-5D-Y

Population norms of EQ-5D-Y, the summary statistics of index values, are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, stratified by the age and sex of the subjects. Table 2 also shows the percentage of respondents who reported being in a full health state by EQ-5D-Y. The mean EQ-5D-Y index values did not depend on the age or sex. These values ranged from 0.90 to 0.95 for all ages and both sexes. The percentage of respondents in full health ranged from 40 to 60%. Conversely, about a half of the children/adolescents reported at least one health problem. However, as even the 25th percentile EQ-5D-Y values were 0.88–0.93, the health problems did not seem severe.

Table 2

Population norms of EQ-5D-Y

Age, years	Sex	EQ-5D-Y index
		N	Mean	SD	Q1	Median	Q3	% of full health
8	Male	226	0.927	0.088	0.888	0.937	1.000	42.9
	Female	229	0.935	0.078	0.898	0.937	1.000	42.8
9	Male	266	0.922	0.084	0.880	0.926	1.000	39.9
	Female	187	0.925	0.087	0.886	0.926	1.000	40.6
10	Male	232	0.927	0.093	0.887	0.935	1.000	43.5
	Female	221	0.942	0.086	0.926	1.000	1.000	53.4
11	Male	220	0.930	0.092	0.888	0.937	1.000	48.2
	Female	241	0.934	0.093	0.897	1.000	1.000	50.6
12	Male	216	0.931	0.094	0.898	0.937	1.000	48.6
	Female	235	0.931	0.097	0.898	0.937	1.000	49.8
13	Male	222	0.934	0.083	0.888	1.000	1.000	51.4
	Female	235	0.911	0.113	0.858	0.926	1.000	42.1
14	Male	199	0.927	0.097	0.888	0.937	1.000	48.2
	Female	251	0.930	0.099	0.886	1.000	1.000	51.8
15	Male	236	0.938	0.114	0.926	1.000	1.000	58.5
	Female	218	0.931	0.100	0.898	0.936	1.000	48.2

SD standard deviation

Fig. 1

Population norms by sex and age

Responses to each item are also shown in Table 3. The item for which most respondents reported not being in a full health state were “feeling worried, sad, or unhappy”. About only 65% of children and adolescents reported having no problem in relation to this item. In contrast, more than 90% of respondents reported being in a full health state for the “looking after myself” item.

Table 3

Distribution of responses

Item	Response, n (%)
	1	2	3
Mobility	3080 (84.8)	494 (13.6)	60 (1.7)
Looking after myself	3328 (91.6)	279 (7.7)	27 (0.7)
Doing usual activities	3035 (83.5)	541 (14.9)	58 (1.6)
Having pain or discomfort	2834 (78.0)	747 (20.6)	53 (1.5)
Feeling worried, sad, or unhappy	2356 (64.8)	1135 (31.2)	143 (3.9)

Relationships Between the EQ-5D-Y Index Values and Demographic Factors

The results of the analysis using the model that included the parents’ demographic factors are shown in Table 4. The marital status, education history, and working status exerted no influence on the EQ-5D-Y index values of the children/adolescents; in contrast, household income was associated with the values. That is, the higher the household income, the higher the EQ-5D-Y index value, although the effect size was small (0.002 per JPY 1 million). In the case of social security payments, the EQ-5D-Y values of those who were receiving social security payments were lower by 0.023 as compared with those who were not receiving social security payments. The values of those who had previously received, but were no longer receiving social security payments were lower by 0.013. Neither of the aforementioned differences was statistically significant (p = 0.376 and p = 0.631, respectively); note that the number of respondents was limited (n = 12 and n = 13, respectively).

Table 4

Relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index values and demographic factors

	Estimate	Standard error	p value
Intercept	0.961	0.026	< 0.001
Children’s age	0.000	0.000	0.629
Children’s sex	0.002	0.003	0.620
Household income (JPY1 million)	0.002	0.000	< 0.001
Parents’ marital status
Married	–	–	–
Others (unmarried, divorced)	0.032	0.020	0.113
Parents’ employment status
Both parents are working	–	–	–
One of the parents is working	0.010	0.015	0.478
Neither parent is working	− 0.008	0.015	0.211
Parents’ history of education (university or graduate)
Both parents	–	–	–
Either parent	0.005	0.005	0.257
Neither	0.006	0.004	0.817

Disutility Associated with Diseases and Symptoms in the Children/Adolescents

Table 5 shows the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y values and parent-reported diseases of the children/adolescents. No pediatric diseases other than heart disease, asthma, ear diseases, epilepsy, and influenza exerted a significant influence on the EQ-5D-Y values. Among other diseases (atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, developmental disability, and cold/gastroenteritis), developmental disability was associated with the largest disutility values of 0.090. Cold/gastroenteritis exerted a moderate influence on the EQ-5D-Y values (the disutility values were 0.040).

Table 5

Disutility scores associated with diseases

	N	Estimate	Standard error	p value
Intercept		0.942	0.008	< 0.001
Age		− 0.000	0.000	0.790
Sex		0.001	0.003	0.634
Disease
Heart disease
No	3604	−		−
Yes	30	− 0.036	0.026	0.162
Asthma
No	3470	−	−	−
Yes	164	− 0.011	0.008	0.180
Atopic dermatitis
No	3366	−	−	−
Yes	268	− 0.013	0.007	0.046
Ear disease (otitis media)
No	3592	−	−	−
Yes	42	0.005	0.017	0.754
Allergic rhinitis
No	2811	−	−	−
Yes	823	− 0.011	0.004	0.007
Epilepsy
No	3618	−	−	−
Yes	16	− 0.079	0.043	0.066
Developmental disability
No	3505	−	−	−
Yes	129	− 0.090	0.013	< 0.001
Influenza
No	3547	−	−	−
Yes	87	0.001	0.012	0.910
Cold or gastroenteritis
No	3505	−	−	−
Yes	129	− 0.040	0.012	0.001
Tooth decay
No	3276	−	−	−
Yes	358	0.023	0.006	< 0.001

Table 6 shows the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y values and the parent-reported symptoms in the children/adolescents. The responses for the frequency of symptoms were classified into three categories (none, occasionally, frequently), and the estimated coefficients did not show any inconsistency, i.e., no case of “frequently” showed a disutility value lower than the values for “occasionally” or “none”. The symptoms that exerted the greatest influence on the EQ-5D-Y values were sleeplessness and body pain. The sizes for sleeplessness were − 0.030 for “occasionally” and − 0.098 for “frequently”, and those for body pain were − 0.023 for “occasionally” and − 0.079 for “frequently”.

Table 6

Disutility associated with symptoms

	N	Estimate	Standard error	p value
Intercept		0.925	0.009	< 0.001
Age		0.002	0.000	0.013
Sex		0.007	0.003	0.013
Symptoms
Headache
No	2605	–		–
Occasionally	913	− 0.011	0.004	0.004
Frequently	116	− 0.027	0.011	0.011
Stomachache
No	2396	–		–
Occasionally	1103	− 0.009	0.003	0.016
Frequently	135	− 0.023	0.012	0.058
Nausea
No	3218	–		–
Occasionally	390	− 0.031	0.006	< 0.001
Frequently	26	− 0.046	0.020	0.020
Sleeplessness
No	3359	–		–
Occasionally	238	− 0.030	0.006	< 0.001
Frequently	37	− 0.098	0.038	< 0.001
Body pain (shoulder, back, and neck)
No	2663	–		–
Occasionally	856	− 0.023	0.004	< 0.001
Frequently	115	− 0.079	0.013	< 0.001
Appetite loss
No	3395	–		–
Occasionally	221	− 0.028	0.008	< 0.001
Frequently	18	− 0.102	0.057	0.074

Disutility Associated with the Family Environment of the Children/Adolescents

The EQ-5D-Y index was significantly associated with the degree of stress in the parents (Appendix). Self-reported parents’ stress was classified into four categories (very much, somewhat, hardly, none). The EQ-5D-Y values of children/adolescents whose parents reported being very much stressed (n = 295) was lower by 0.072 (p < 0.001), and that of children/adolescents whose parents reported being somewhat stressed (n = 2437) was lower by 0.022 (p = 0.001) as compared with that of the children/adolescents whose parents reported no stress (none). In addition, the happiness level of the parents also significantly influenced the EQ-5D-Y values of the children/adolescents. The EQ-5D-Y values of children/adolescents whose parents’ happiness level was 6 or lower on a scale of 10 were lower. The disutility size was 0.045 (n = 42, p = 0.026) for a happiness level of 1–3 on a scale of 10 and 0.036 (n = 457, p < 0.001) for a happiness level of 4–6 on a scale of 10, as compared to a happiness level of 7–10 on a scale of 10. It is possible that the parents’ mental health condition influences the health states of their children/adolescents, although the causal relation remains unclear.

In addition, in regard to the lifestyles of the children/adolescents, their bedtime was significantly associated with the EQ-5D-Y values. Children/adolescents who went to bed before 10 p.m. (n = 1275) had higher EQ-5D-Y values as compared with children/adolescents who went to bed between 11 p.m. and midnight (− 0.021, p < 0.001, n = 807), between midnight and 1 a.m. (− 0.028, p < 0.001, n = 282), or at 1 a.m. or later (− 0.080, p < 0.001, n = 59). Finally, the EQ-5D-Y values of children/adolescents who had breakfast with their family members everyday (n = 3317) were significantly higher than those of children/adolescents who had breakfast alone everyday (n = 75); the disutility size was 0.057 (p = 0.003).

Discussion

This large sample survey conducted by random sampling yielded the following. First, population norms in Japan were established, and this is the first report of establishment of the population norms of EQ-5D-Y. The EQ-5D-Y values did not differ depending on the age or sex of the children/adolescents. Second, we obtained the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y values of the children/adolescents and the demographic characteristics of their parents. Only household income was identified as a statistically significant factor, but the effect size was small. Third, we constructed a disutility catalogue of the children/adolescents’ diseases and symptoms. Developmental disability were associated with large disutility values, as were the symptoms of sleeplessness and body pain. Finally, some mental states of the parents and some lifestyles of the children/adolescents were associated with significantly decreased EQ-5D-Y values. Our results also show that surveys based on the EQ-5D-Y are feasible. The results of the assessment of the EQ-5D-Y were sufficiently interpretable, and clear dose–response relationships were detected.

According to the population norms of EQ-5D-5L in Japan [28], the mean value for respondents aged 16–19 years is 0.978 for male individuals and 0.967 for female individuals. More than 80% were found to be in a full health state (85.9% [male] and 80.6% [female]). The index value of the respondents aged 60–69 years was 0.930 for male individuals and 0.927 for female individuals; 60.9% of the male respondents and 55.7% of all the respondents were found to be in a full health state. In comparison, according to the EQ-5D-Y norms, the percentage of children/adolescents in a full health state was smaller. It shows similar percentage with respondents aged 60–69 years. As it is highly likely that the actual average health states are not different between respondents aged 15 years or under and aged 16–19 years, it is possible that the responsiveness of the two Japanese EQ-5D instruments are different.

The Japanese EQ-5D-Y value for the worst health state [33333] was 0.29, which was much higher than the adult EQ-5D value (− 0.11 in EQ-5D-3L [32] and − 0.03 in EQ-5D-5L [33]). The disutility values according to the Japanese EQ-5D-Y scoring algorithm tend to be smaller than those estimated by adult EQ-5D instruments for each item and level. Therefore, it may be unreasonable to conduct a simple comparison of our estimated EQ-5D-Y disutility values with those measured by adult EQ-5D instruments. For example, it is likely that a disutility value of 0.1 estimated by EQ-5D-Y does not correspond to a similar degree of deterioration of the health states as a disutility value of 0.1 measured by the adult EQ-5D instrument. Although the minimal important difference of EQ-5D-Y has not been reported yet, it could be smaller than that of adult EQ-5D [34]. These differences should be taken into consideration while interpreting our results; problems may arise if these differences are ignored. For example, it is good for children that health technologies to prolong children’s or adolescents’ life-years have become more cost effective than those for adults. However, assuming that a healthcare technology can restore a patient’s health state from a worse state to full health, the improvement in the children/adolescents’ quality of life would be smaller than that of adults.

When the Japanese EQ-5D-5L population norms were analyzed, sex, household income, and length of education were found to be significantly associated with the index values. [28] However according to our survey, the sex of the children/adolescents had no influence on the index values, nor had the parents’ characteristics, except for household income, the effect size of which was also not large. The respondents’ own demographic characteristics and their parents’ demographic characteristics may exert different influences on the health states and/or disutility. In the case of the Japanese EQ-5D-5L population norms, Parkinson’s disease (0.35), stroke (0.27), dementia (0.22), and depression (0.18) are associated with the largest disutility values. However, in the EQ-5D-Y, developmental disability were associated with the largest disutility values of 0.090. The disutility associated with disease according to the EQ-5D-Y seems smaller, but it is not yet clear if that is dependent on the type of disease or the characteristics of the instrument.

The sample size in our survey was 3600. In this area, the sample size cannot be determined by statistical considerations, but the sample size is important for the representativeness and accuracy of the population norms. One of the largest surveys, as compared to the EQ-5D-5L population norms survey, was performed in Spain [14]. The sample size was more than 20,000. However, a German survey was conducted on 5000 subjects [21], a Polish survey on about 4000 subjects [15], and an Australian and Quebec survey on about 3000 subjects [13, 24]. About 1000 respondents were sampled for establishing the norms in Hong Kong [22], USA (only face-to-face survey) [26], Japan [27], Ireland [19], Bulgaria [25], Slovenia [23], and Indonesia [17]. Considering these existing studies, our sample size was comparable and sufficiently large to estimate population norms.

We believe that the population norms of EQ-5D-Y established by us are scientifically valid; however, they may present some difficult issues for the decision makers. Our results showed that the Japanese EQ-5D-Y population norms for children/adolescents aged 15 years or under were not consistent with those of the respondents aged 16–19 years as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, despite presumably similar health states. When both the EQ-5D-Y and 5L norms are used for cost-effectiveness analyses of pediatric interventions, it may be difficult to justify applying lower norms only to children/adolescents aged 8–15 years and higher norms for those aged 16–19 years. It is also difficult to explain why the switching of the two (EQ-5D-Y-based and 5L-based) population norms occurred at the age of 16 years, and not at the age of 15 or 17 years, for example; the reasons are not health related. These issues may need to be clarified, especially when our population norms are applied to cost-effectiveness analyses for decision making.

The strength of our study lay in the robust random sampling and the reasonably large sample size. Our sampling method using the Basic Resident Register data was a robust and reliable sampling method. There was no bias related to the area of residence of the sampled respondents. The sample number was relatively high, as mentioned above. Each category stratified by sex and age included more than 200 respondents, which we believe is a sufficient number to obtain reliable results and reasonably interpret the results. In addition, we included a number of background questions, including those related to the parents’ demographic characteristics, diseases and symptoms of the subjects, and the family environment. Thus, we were able to explore the relationships between the EQ-5D-Y values and the data obtained about the background factors. In contrast, this study had the following limitation. While our survey was based on a robust random sampling method, the response rate was only about 45%, which may be low. Our survey was a community-based, and we did not include children/adolescents admitted to hospitals and institutions. Therefore, children/adolescents with severe diseases or in adverse environments were not included in our survey. In addition, in our survey, we requested that the children/adolescents self-complete the EQ-5D-Y questionnaire and prohibited proxy responses. However, we could not confirm that it was indeed the children/adolescents who responded to the EQ-5D-Y and their parents to the background questions. Background information, especially in relation to the disease and symptoms, is based on the parents’ proxy report. It may be different from the assessment by the clinicians.

Conclusions

This was the first report of establishment of the EQ-5D-Y population norms for Japan based on a large sample survey. According to the estimated population norms, the EQ-5D-Y values did not differ depending on the age or sex of the children/adolescents. This suggests that it may also be feasible to apply the results of the EQ-5D-Y survey to younger children aged 8 or 9 years. We constructed a disutility catalogue of children/adolescents’ diseases and symptoms. Developmental disability associated with large disutility values, as were the symptoms of sleeplessness and body pain. These results can be used for economic evaluation of healthcare technologies for children/adolescents, although the difference in characteristics between EQ-5D-Y and adult EQ-5D would need to be considered.

We established population norms of EQ-5D-Y in Japan. The mean EQ-5D-Y index value did not depend on the age or sex

We constructed a disutility catalogue of diseases/symptoms of the children/adolescents. Developmental disability were associated with large disutility scores, as were sleeplessness and body pain

Stress in the parents and some lifestyles of the children and adolescents were associated with significantly decreased EQ-5D-Y index values

Relationships between the EQ-5D-Y index values and family environment

	N	Coefficient	Standard error	P value
(a) Social security payment
Intercept		0.927	0.009	< 0.001
Age		0.000	0.001	0.837
Sex		0.001	0.003	0.850
Social security payment
Currently	12	− 0.023	0.026	0.376
Previously	13	− 0.013	0.028	0.631
None	3609	–	–	–
(b) Stress
Intercept		0.947	0.011	< 0.001
Age		0.000	0.001	0.732
Sex		0.001	0.003	0.778
Stress or worries
Very much	295	− 0.072	0.010	< 0.001
Somewhat	2437	− 0.022	0.006	0.001
Hardly	773	− 0.007	0.007	0.282
None	129	–		–
(c) Happiness level
Intercept		0.931	0.009	< 0.001
Age		0.000	0.001	0.647
Sex		0.000	0.003	0.903
Happiness level
7–10	3135	–		–
4–6	457	− 0.036	0.020	0.026
1–3	42	− 0.045	0.006	< 0.001
(d) Breakfast
Intercept		0.867	0.021	< 0.001
Age		0.001	0.001	0.292
Sex		0.000	0.003	0.892
Breakfast with family members
Every day	3317	0.057	0.019	0.003
4–6 days per week	148	0.033	0.021	0.112
1–3 days per week	94	0.034	0.022	0.129
None	75	–		–
(e) Bedtime
Intercept		0.899	0.010	< 0.001
Age		0.003	0.001	< 0.001
Sex		0.001	0.004	0.710
Bedtime
< 10:00 p.m.	1275	–		–
10:00 p.m. < = <11:00 p.m.	1211	− 0.006	0.004	0.129
11:00 p.m. < = <0:00 p.m.	807	− 0.021	0.006	< 0.001
0:00 p.m. < = <1:00 a.m.	282	− 0.028	0.008	< 0.001
1:00 a.m. <=	59	− 0.080	0.019	<0.001