Literature DB >> 27565282

Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.

Takeru Shiroiwa1, Shunya Ikeda2, Shinichi Noto3, Ataru Igarashi4, Takashi Fukuda5, Shinya Saito6, Kojiro Shimozuma7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The valuation study of the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) involved composite time trade-off (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE scores must be anchored to the quality-of-life scale from 0 (death) to 1 (full health). Nevertheless, the characteristics of the statistical methods used for converting the EQ-5D-5L DCE results by using TTO information are not yet clearly known.
OBJECTIVES: To present the Japanese DCE value set of the EQ-5D-5L and compare three methods for converting latent DCE values.
METHODS: The survey sampled the general population at five locations in Japan. 1098 respondents were stratified by age and sex. To obtain and compare the value sets of the EQ-5D-5L, the cTTO and DCE data were analyzed by a linear mixed model and conditional logit, respectively. The DCE scores were converted to the quality-of-life scale by anchoring to the worst state using cTTO, mapping DCE onto cTTO, and a hybrid model.
RESULTS: The data from 1026 respondents were analyzed. All the coefficients in the cTTO and DCE value sets were consistent throughout all the analyses. Compared with the cTTO algorithm, the mapping and hybrid methods yielded very similar scoring coefficients. The hybrid model results, however, produced a lower root mean square error and fewer health states with errors exceeding 0.05 than did the other models. The DCE anchored to the worst state overestimated the cTTO scores of almost all the health states.
CONCLUSIONS: Japanese value sets based on DCE were demonstrated. On comparing the observed cTTO scores, we found that the hybrid model was slightly superior to the simpler methods, including the TTO model.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D-5L; discrete choice experiment (DCE); preference; time trade-off (TTO)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565282     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  66 in total

1.  EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Malaysian Population.

Authors:  Asrul Akmal Shafie; Annushiah Vasan Thakumar; Ching Jou Lim; Nan Luo; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Faridah Aryani Md Yusof
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Do country-specific preference weights matter in the choice of mapping algorithms? The case of mapping the Diabetes-39 onto eight country-specific EQ-5D-5L value sets.

Authors:  Admassu N Lamu; Gang Chen; Thor Gamst-Klaussen; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  EQ-5D-5L: a value set for Romania.

Authors:  Elena Olariu; Wael Mohammed; Yemi Oluboyede; Raluca Caplescu; Ileana Gabriela Niculescu-Aron; Marian Sorin Paveliu; Luke Vale
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Effect of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention on quality of life in patients with fragility fractures: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  R Okuda; M Osaki; Y Saeki; T Okano; K Tsuda; T Nakamura; Y Morio; H Nagashima; H Hagino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Mina Bahrampour; Joshua Byrnes; Richard Norman; Paul A Scuffham; Martin Downes
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-05-04

6.  Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.

Authors:  Takeru Shiroiwa; Shunya Ikeda; Shinichi Noto; Takashi Fukuda; Elly Stolk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Quality of life of patients with hematological malignancies and factors affecting health state utility values.

Authors:  Keiichi Osaki; Shinichiro Morishita; Suzuho Takami; Yuki Sakai; Akiho Kamimura; Atsushi Shindo; Eri Kawata
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Impact of Neck and Shoulder Pain on Health-Related Quality of Life in a Middle-Aged Community-Living Population.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Hiroaki Nakashima; Masayoshi Morozumi; Shunsuke Kanbara; Sadayuki Ito; Taro Inoue; Hiroyuki Koshimizu; Taisuke Seki; Shinya Ishizuka; Yasuhiko Takegami; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Changes in Physical and Psychological States with Respect to the Gender of Outpatients Receiving Rehabilitation at Geriatric Health Services Facilities during the COVID-19 State of Emergency.

Authors:  Kazuhiro P Izawa; Masataka Oyama; Keisuke Okamoto
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2021-07-03

10.  Incorporating Unstructured Patient Narratives and Health Insurance Claims Data in Pharmacovigilance: Natural Language Processing Analysis of Patient-Generated Texts About Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Shinichi Matsuda; Takumi Ohtomo; Shiho Tomizawa; Yuki Miyano; Miwako Mogi; Hiroshi Kuriki; Terumi Nakayama; Shinichi Watanabe
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.