Literature DB >> 31731324

Improved Patient Satisfaction following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Austin F Smith1, Christian J Eccles1, Samrath J Bhimani1, Kevin M Denehy1, Rohat B Bhimani2, Langan S Smith3, Arthur L Malkani4.   

Abstract

Approximately 20% of the patients are dissatisfied with their total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer technology has been introduced for TKA to provide real time intraoperative information on limb alignment and exact flexion/extension gap measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient satisfaction could be improved with the use of robotic-assisted (RA) technology following primary TKA. A total of 120 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with real time intraoperative alignment and gap balancing information were compared with a prospective cohort of 103 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with manual jig-based instruments during the same time period. There were no differences between groups with age, gender, baseline Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and function scores, follow-up, and ASA scores. TKAs were performed using same technique, implant design, anesthesia, and postoperative treatment protocols. Patient satisfaction survey using KSS and Likert scoring system were obtained at 1-year follow-up. Likert scoring system demonstrated 94% of the patients in the RA group were either very satisfied or satisfied versus 82% in the manual instruments TKA group (p = 0.005). RA-TKA group had better average scores of all five satisfaction questions although not significant. RA-TKA group had a better average overall satisfaction score of 7.1 versus 6.6 in the manual instrument group, p = 0.03. KSS function scores were significantly better at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.02, 0.005), and KSS knee scores were significantly better at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.046). There are multiple reasons for patient dissatisfaction following primary TKA. Using intraoperative computer technology with RA surgery for patients undergoing a primary TKA, a significant improvement in patient satisfaction was demonstrated compared with TKA using conventional manual jig-based instruments. RA surgery provides several advantages in TKA including real time information in millimeters to help obtain balanced gaps, accurate bone cuts, reduced soft tissue injury, and achieve the target alignment which may lead to improved patient satisfaction. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31731324     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  22 in total

Review 1.  Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the ROSA knee system.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Didier Hannouche; Francesco Benazzo; Sébastien Parratte
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ari Seidenstein; Miles Birmingham; Jared Foran; Steven Ogden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  An anatomo-functional implant positioning technique with robotic assistance for primary TKA allows the restoration of the native knee alignment and a natural functional ligament pattern, with a faster recovery at 6 months compared to an adjusted mechanical technique.

Authors:  Sébastien Parratte; Philippe Van Overschelde; Marc Bandi; Burak Yagmur Ozturk; Cécile Batailler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparative outcomes between a new robotically assisted and a manual technique for total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: a prospective matched comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Eustathios Kenanidis; George Paparoidamis; Nikolaos Milonakis; Michael Potoupnis; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-12

5.  Is sequential bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A matched comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Mike B Anderson; Xavier Flecher; Matthieu Ollivier; Sébastien Parratte
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Is there a maximum level of efficiency for the operating surgeon?

Authors:  Kishan Patel; Hyrum Judd; Richard G Harm; Joseph R Nolan; Matthew Hummel; Jonathon Spanyer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Decreased patient comorbidities and post-operative complications in technology-assisted compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan J O'Rourke; Anthony J Milto; Brian P Kurcz; Steven L Scaife; D Gordon Allan; Youssef El Bitar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study.

Authors:  Christopher L Blum; Eric Lepkowsky; Adil Hussein; Edgar A Wakelin; Christopher Plaskos; Jan A Koenig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  James Randolph Onggo; Jason Derry Onggo; Richard De Steiger; Raphael Hau
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.