| Literature DB >> 34276818 |
Danping Zhang1, Qiong Bian1, Yi Zhou1, Qiaoling Huang2, Jianqing Gao1,3.
Abstract
The penetration behavior of topical substances in the skin not only relates to the transdermal delivery efficiency but also involves the safety and therapeutic effect of topical products, such as sunscreen and hair growth products. Researchers have tried to illustrate the transdermal process with diversified theories and technologies. Directly observing the distribution of topical substances on skin by characteristic imaging is the most convincing approach. Unfortunately, fluorescence labeling imaging, which is commonly used in biochemical research, is limited for transdermal research for most topical substances with a molecular mass less than 500 Da. Label-free imaging technologies possess the advantages of not requiring any macromolecular dyes, no tissue destruction and an extensive substance detection capability, which has enabled rapid development of such technologies in recent years and their introduction to biological tissue analysis, such as skin samples. Through the specific identification of topical substances and endogenous tissue components, label-free imaging technologies can provide abundant tissue distribution information, enrich theoretical and practical guidance for transdermal drug delivery systems. In this review, we expound the mechanisms and applications of the most popular label-free imaging technologies in transdermal research at present, compare their advantages and disadvantages, and forecast development prospects.Entities:
Keywords: Infrared spectroscopy; Label-free imaging technology; Mass spectrometry; Mechanism research; Raman spectrum
Year: 2020 PMID: 34276818 PMCID: PMC8261078 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2020.07.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 1818-0876 Impact factor: 6.598
Fig. 1Investigating skin by label-free imaging technologies can be performed by tape stripping (A), tissue sections (B), or directly carried on intact skin in vitro (C) or in vivo (D).
Fig. 2Infrared spectroscopy (A), Raman spectrum (B) and mass spectrometry imaging (C) can distinguish the target substances from the complex skin background according to the characteristic vibration signals or mass-to-charge ratio (m/z).
Fig. 3Raman spectroscopy could be used for in vivo detection with gratifying results. (A): The designed CARS and two-photon autofluorescence imaging system successfully quantified the percutaneous penetration in vivo of deuterated glycerol diluted in water and xanthan gel. (Reproduced with permission from [34], Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V.). (B&C): The Raman spectra obtained after treatment by optical clearing agent glycerol showed a significant enhancement of the investigated depths of tattoo on the inner forearm, from ≈75 µm down to 400 µm. (Reproduced from [105], Copyright 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Fig. 4MSI imaging could combined with morphological observations, such as SEM and H&E staining. (A): A previous work used TOF-SIMS to co-locate ruxolitinib (green), phosphatidylcholine (PC) fragments (red) and ceramide fragment (blue) in mouse ear. SEM imaging was carried out after TOF-SIMS to identify the different skin layers. (Reprinted with permission from [118], Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society). (B): H&E staining and MALDI-MSI were applied on a cross section of porcine buccal mucosa exposed to nicotine and mannitol solution. Red: Nicotine. Blue: Mannitol. Green: Epithelial marker. (Reprinted with permission from [126], Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society).
Comparison of three types of MSI.
| SIMS | MALDI | DESI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular mass range | 100–1500 Da | 1000–80,000 Da | 100–2000 Da |
| Sample preparation | No special sample preparation process | Complex sample preparation process, including special slide and matrix spraying | No special sample preparation process and allow detecting under atmospheric pressure |
| Spatial resolution | 400 nm–200 µm | 10 µm–200 µm | 50 µm–200 µm |
| Reasons for data distortion | Secondary collision of ions with background | The desorption ability differences of matrix to analytes and the diffusion of analyte in solvent | Solubility difference and displacement of microdroplets on the surface of samples |
Comparation of IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and MSI.
| Infrared spectroscopy | Raman spectroscopy | Mass spectrometry imaging | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy source | Infrared light source | Ultraviolet to near infrared region | High energy ion beam |
| Spatial resolution | 5–500 µm | Hundreds of microns to sub-microns | Hundreds of microns to sub-microns |
| Penetration depth | Less than 5 µm | Up to 400 µm | Detecting tissue surface |
| Requirements for | Characteristic infrared vibration | Characteristic Raman vibration | Widely suitable for substances with molecular mass from 100 to 80 000 Da |
| Analytical specificity | Not easy to distinguish substances specifically | Higher specificity and accuracy | Strong substances discrimination ability |
| Background | With serious background interference | Reduced by mathematical calculation, hardware improvement, using of light scavenger, etc. | Mainly comes from matrix or molecular fragment and could be reduced |
| Major difficulties/ limitation | Background interference and low accuracy | Long acquisition time and data analysis | Pretreatment of samples, no 3D imaging capability |