Literature DB >> 2629214

Stereopsis and contrast.

G E Legge1, Y C Gu.   

Abstract

We have measured threshold disparity as a function of the spatial frequency (0.25-20 c/deg) and contrast (0.02-0.75) of sine-wave gratings. In forced-choice trials, subjects indicated whether a target grating had crossed or uncrossed disparity relative to a reference grating. Thresholds were lowest near 3 c/deg and rose in proportion to spatial period at lower frequencies. Above 3 c/deg, there were marked individual differences. Across the range of spatial frequencies, disparity sensitivity and contrast sensitivity were correlated (r = 0.84). Threshold disparity was inversely proportional to the square root of contrast. When the contrast seen by one eye was reduced producing unequal monocular contrasts, threshold disparity rose more than when the contrast seen by the two eyes was reduced by the same amount. Our results have implications for stereo models that use zero crossings, peaks and troughs, or centroids as matching primitives. These models can account for the decline in disparity sensitivity at low sapatial frequencies but only the peak model satisfactorily accounts for the effect of contrast. If the limiting sources of noise in the two eyes are highly correlated, the effect of unequal monocular contrast can be accounted for using a differential-amplifier principle.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2629214     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90114-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  62 in total

1.  Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: monocular versus binocular mechanisms.

Authors:  A M Truchard; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes.

Authors:  D J Morrison; P G Schyns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Alejandro Cerviño; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Temporal integration property of stereopsis after higher-order aberration correction.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 6.  Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Marcos Ruiz-Soler; Francesc S Beltran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-02

7.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Naomi V Odell; Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Wendy E Adams; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Mechanisms underlying simultaneous brightness contrast: Early and innate.

Authors:  Pawan Sinha; Sarah Crucilla; Tapan Gandhi; Dylan Rose; Amy Singh; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.