Literature DB >> 34262027

Two end-member earthquake preparations illuminated by foreshock activity on a meter-scale laboratory fault.

Futoshi Yamashita1, Eiichi Fukuyama2,3, Shiqing Xu2,4, Hironori Kawakata2,5, Kazuo Mizoguchi2,6, Shigeru Takizawa2.   

Abstract

The preparation process of natural earthquakes is still difficult to quantify and remains a subject of debate even with modern observational techniques. Here, we show that foreshock activity can shed light on understanding the earthquake preparation process based on results of meter-scale rock friction experiments. Experiments were conducted under two different fault surface conditions before each run: less heterogeneous fault without pre-existing gouge and more heterogeneous fault with pre-existing gouge. The results show that fewer foreshocks occurred along the less heterogeneous fault and were driven by preslip; in contrast, more foreshocks with a lower b value occurred along the more heterogeneous fault and showed features of cascade-up. We suggest that the fault surface condition and the stress redistribution caused by the ongoing fault slip mode control the earthquake preparation process, including the behavior of foreshock activity. Our findings imply that foreshock activity can be a key indicator for probing the fault conditions at present and in the future, and therefore useful for assessing earthquake hazard.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34262027     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24625-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  9 in total

1.  Positive feedback, memory, and the predictability of earthquakes.

Authors:  C G Sammis; D Sornette
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.

Authors:  Aitaro Kato; Kazushige Obara; Toshihiro Igarashi; Hiroshi Tsuruoka; Shigeki Nakagawa; Naoshi Hirata
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Scale dependence of rock friction at high work rate.

Authors:  Futoshi Yamashita; Eiichi Fukuyama; Kazuo Mizoguchi; Shigeru Takizawa; Shiqing Xu; Hironori Kawakata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.

Authors:  Danijel Schorlemmer; Stefan Wiemer; Max Wyss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Seismic evidence for an earthquake nucleation phase.

Authors:  W L Ellsworth; G C Beroza
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extended nucleation of the 1999 Mw 7.6 Izmit earthquake.

Authors:  Michel Bouchon; Hayrullah Karabulut; Mustafa Aktar; Serdar Ozalaybey; Jean Schmittbuhl; Marie-Paule Bouin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake.

Authors:  Bernd Schurr; Günter Asch; Sebastian Hainzl; Jonathan Bedford; Andreas Hoechner; Mauro Palo; Rongjiang Wang; Marcos Moreno; Mitja Bartsch; Yong Zhang; Onno Oncken; Frederik Tilmann; Torsten Dahm; Pia Victor; Sergio Barrientos; Jean-Pierre Vilotte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cohesive zone length of metagabbro at supershear rupture velocity.

Authors:  Eiichi Fukuyama; Shiqing Xu; Futoshi Yamashita; Kazuo Mizoguchi
Journal:  J Seismol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 1.489

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.