Literature DB >> 21330536

Extended nucleation of the 1999 Mw 7.6 Izmit earthquake.

Michel Bouchon1, Hayrullah Karabulut, Mustafa Aktar, Serdar Ozalaybey, Jean Schmittbuhl, Marie-Paule Bouin.   

Abstract

Laboratory and theoretical studies suggest that earthquakes are preceded by a phase of developing slip instability in which the fault slips slowly before accelerating to dynamic rupture. We report here that one of the best-recorded large earthquakes to date, the 1999 moment magnitude (M(w)) 7.6 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake, was preceded by a seismic signal of long duration that originated from the hypocenter. The signal consisted of a succession of repetitive seismic bursts, accelerating with time, and increased low-frequency seismic noise. These observations show that the earthquake was preceded for 44 minutes by a phase of slow slip occurring at the base of the brittle crust. This slip accelerated slowly initially, and then rapidly accelerated in the 2 minutes preceding the earthquake.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21330536     DOI: 10.1126/science.1197341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  18 in total

1.  Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California.

Authors:  L Moutote; D Marsan; O Lengliné; Z Duputel
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.720

2.  Rapid changes in the electrical state of the 1999 Izmit earthquake rupture zone.

Authors:  Yoshimori Honkura; Naoto Oshiman; Masaki Matsushima; Serif Barış; Mustafa Kemal Tunçer; Sabri Bülent Tank; Cengiz Celik; Elif Tolak Ciftçi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Real-time earthquake monitoring using a search engine method.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Haijiang Zhang; Enhong Chen; Yi Zheng; Wenhuan Kuang; Xiong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Areas prone to slow slip events impede earthquake rupture propagation and promote afterslip.

Authors:  Frederique Rolandone; Jean-Mathieu Nocquet; Patricia A Mothes; Paul Jarrin; Martin Vallée; Nadaya Cubas; Stephen Hernandez; Morgan Plain; Sandro Vaca; Yvonne Font
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.

Authors:  Xiaowei Chen; Nori Nakata; Colin Pennington; Jackson Haffener; Jefferson C Chang; Xiaohui He; Zhongwen Zhan; Sidao Ni; Jacob I Walter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Shallow deformation of the San Andreas fault 5 years following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake (Mw6) combining ERS2 and Envisat InSAR.

Authors:  Guillaume Bacques; Marcello de Michele; Daniel Raucoules; Hideo Aochi; Frédérique Rolandone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Hierarchical rupture growth evidenced by the initial seismic waveforms.

Authors:  Takashi Okuda; Satoshi Ide
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Two end-member earthquake preparations illuminated by foreshock activity on a meter-scale laboratory fault.

Authors:  Futoshi Yamashita; Eiichi Fukuyama; Shiqing Xu; Hironori Kawakata; Kazuo Mizoguchi; Shigeru Takizawa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Mignan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Gas and seismicity within the Istanbul seismic gap.

Authors:  L Géli; P Henry; C Grall; J-B Tary; A Lomax; E Batsi; V Riboulot; E Cros; C Gürbüz; S E Işık; A M C Sengör; X Le Pichon; L Ruffine; S Dupré; Y Thomas; D Kalafat; G Bayrakci; Q Coutellier; T Regnier; G Westbrook; H Saritas; G Çifçi; M N Çağatay; M S Özeren; N Görür; M Tryon; M Bohnhoff; L Gasperini; F Klingelhoefer; C Scalabrin; J-M Augustin; D Embriaco; G Marinaro; F Frugoni; S Monna; G Etiope; P Favali; A Bécel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.