Literature DB >> 16177788

Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.

Danijel Schorlemmer1, Stefan Wiemer, Max Wyss.   

Abstract

The earthquake size distribution follows, in most instances, a power law, with the slope of this power law, the 'b value', commonly used to describe the relative occurrence of large and small events (a high b value indicates a larger proportion of small earthquakes, and vice versa). Statistically significant variations of b values have been measured in laboratory experiments, mines and various tectonic regimes such as subducting slabs, near magma chambers, along fault zones and in aftershock zones. However, it has remained uncertain whether these differences are due to differing stress regimes, as it was questionable that samples in small volumes (such as in laboratory specimens, mines and the shallow Earth's crust) are representative of earthquakes in general. Given the lack of physical understanding of these differences, the observation that b values approach the constant 1 if large volumes are sampled was interpreted to indicate that b = 1 is a universal constant for earthquakes in general. Here we show that the b value varies systematically for different styles of faulting. We find that normal faulting events have the highest b values, thrust events the lowest and strike-slip events intermediate values. Given that thrust faults tend to be under higher stress than normal faults we infer that the b value acts as a stress meter that depends inversely on differential stress.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16177788     DOI: 10.1038/nature04094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  34 in total

1.  Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statistical seismology.

Authors:  Clément Narteau; Svetlana Byrdina; Peter Shebalin; Danijel Schorlemmer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Generalized statistical mechanics approaches to earthquakes and tectonics.

Authors:  Filippos Vallianatos; Giorgos Papadakis; Georgios Michas
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Mapping heterogeneities through avalanche statistics.

Authors:  Soumyajyoti Biswas; Lucas Goehring
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake.

Authors:  Bernd Schurr; Günter Asch; Sebastian Hainzl; Jonathan Bedford; Andreas Hoechner; Mauro Palo; Rongjiang Wang; Marcos Moreno; Mitja Bartsch; Yong Zhang; Onno Oncken; Frederik Tilmann; Torsten Dahm; Pia Victor; Sergio Barrientos; Jean-Pierre Vilotte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  From coseismic offsets to fault-block mountains.

Authors:  George A Thompson; Tom Parsons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Maturity of nearby faults influences seismic hazard from hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Maria Kozłowska; Michael R Brudzinski; Paul Friberg; Robert J Skoumal; Nicholas D Baxter; Brian S Currie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Data-driven spatiotemporal assessment of the event-size distribution of the Groningen extraction-induced seismicity catalogue.

Authors:  A G Muntendam-Bos; N Grobbe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks.

Authors:  Laura Gulia; Stefan Wiemer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Common dependence on stress for the statistics of granular avalanches and earthquakes.

Authors:  Takahiro Hatano; Clément Narteau; Peter Shebalin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Two end-member earthquake preparations illuminated by foreshock activity on a meter-scale laboratory fault.

Authors:  Futoshi Yamashita; Eiichi Fukuyama; Shiqing Xu; Hironori Kawakata; Kazuo Mizoguchi; Shigeru Takizawa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.