Literature DB >> 25119049

Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake.

Bernd Schurr1, Günter Asch1, Sebastian Hainzl1, Jonathan Bedford1, Andreas Hoechner1, Mauro Palo1, Rongjiang Wang1, Marcos Moreno1, Mitja Bartsch1, Yong Zhang2, Onno Oncken1, Frederik Tilmann1, Torsten Dahm1, Pia Victor1, Sergio Barrientos3, Jean-Pierre Vilotte4.   

Abstract

On 1 April 2014, Northern Chile was struck by a magnitude 8.1 earthquake following a protracted series of foreshocks. The Integrated Plate Boundary Observatory Chile monitored the entire sequence of events, providing unprecedented resolution of the build-up to the main event and its rupture evolution. Here we show that the Iquique earthquake broke a central fraction of the so-called northern Chile seismic gap, the last major segment of the South American plate boundary that had not ruptured in the past century. Since July 2013 three seismic clusters, each lasting a few weeks, hit this part of the plate boundary with earthquakes of increasing peak magnitudes. Starting with the second cluster, geodetic observations show surface displacements that can be associated with slip on the plate interface. These seismic clusters and their slip transients occupied a part of the plate interface that was transitional between a fully locked and a creeping portion. Leading up to this earthquake, the b value of the foreshocks gradually decreased during the years before the earthquake, reversing its trend a few days before the Iquique earthquake. The mainshock finally nucleated at the northern end of the foreshock area, which skirted a locked patch, and ruptured mainly downdip towards higher locking. Peak slip was attained immediately downdip of the foreshock region and at the margin of the locked patch. We conclude that gradual weakening of the central part of the seismic gap accentuated by the foreshock activity in a zone of intermediate seismic coupling was instrumental in causing final failure, distinguishing the Iquique earthquake from most great earthquakes. Finally, only one-third of the gap was broken and the remaining locked segments now pose a significant, increased seismic hazard with the potential to host an earthquake with a magnitude of >8.5.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119049     DOI: 10.1038/nature13681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  5 in total

1.  Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.

Authors:  Aitaro Kato; Kazushige Obara; Toshihiro Igarashi; Hiroshi Tsuruoka; Shigeki Nakagawa; Naoshi Hirata
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes.

Authors:  Danijel Schorlemmer; Stefan Wiemer; Max Wyss
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Extent, duration and speed of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake imaged by the Hi-Net array.

Authors:  Miaki Ishii; Peter M Shearer; Heidi Houston; John E Vidale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Tracking the rupture of the Mw = 9.3 Sumatra earthquake over 1,150 km at teleseismic distance.

Authors:  Frank Krüger; Matthias Ohrnberger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stable creeping fault segments can become destructive as a result of dynamic weakening.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Noda; Nadia Lapusta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Earth science: Warning signs of the Iquique earthquake.

Authors:  Roland Bürgmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Microseismicity Appears to Outline Highly Coupled Regions on the Central Chile Megathrust.

Authors:  C Sippl; M Moreno; R Benavente
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Megathrust reflectivity reveals the updip limit of the 2014 Iquique earthquake rupture.

Authors:  Bo Ma; Jacob Geersen; Dietrich Lange; Dirk Klaeschen; Ingo Grevemeyer; Eduardo Contreras-Reyes; Florian Petersen; Michael Riedel; Yueyang Xia; Anne M Tréhu; Heidrun Kopp
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Accelerated nucleation of the 2014 Iquique, Chile Mw 8.2 Earthquake.

Authors:  Aitaro Kato; Jun'ichi Fukuda; Takao Kumazawa; Shigeki Nakagawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Calibrating coseismic coastal land-level changes during the 2014 Iquique (Mw=8.2) earthquake (northern Chile) with leveling, GPS and intertidal biota.

Authors:  Eduardo Jaramillo; Daniel Melnick; Juan Carlos Baez; Henry Montecino; Nelson A Lagos; Emilio Acuña; Mario Manzano; Patricio A Camus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Audit of stored strain energy and extent of future earthquake rupture in central Himalaya.

Authors:  K M Sreejith; P S Sunil; Ritesh Agrawal; Ajish P Saji; A S Rajawat; D S Ramesh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Two end-member earthquake preparations illuminated by foreshock activity on a meter-scale laboratory fault.

Authors:  Futoshi Yamashita; Eiichi Fukuyama; Shiqing Xu; Hironori Kawakata; Kazuo Mizoguchi; Shigeru Takizawa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Tsunami detection by GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content.

Authors:  Mahesh N Shrivastava; Ajeet K Maurya; Gabriel Gonzalez; Poikayil S Sunil; Juan Gonzalez; Pablo Salazar; Rafael Aranguiz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Subducting seamounts control interplate coupling and seismic rupture in the 2014 Iquique earthquake area.

Authors:  Jacob Geersen; César R Ranero; Udo Barckhausen; Christian Reichert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Microearthquakes preceding a M4.2 Earthquake Offshore Istanbul.

Authors:  Peter E Malin; Marco Bohnhoff; Felix Blümle; Georg Dresen; Patricia Martínez-Garzón; Murat Nurlu; Ulubey Ceken; Filiz Tuba Kadirioglu; Recai Feyiz Kartal; Tugbay Kilic; Kenan Yanik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.