| Literature DB >> 34256869 |
Andrey Yurkov1, Artur Alves2, Feng-Yan Bai3, Kyria Boundy-Mills4, Pietro Buzzini5, Neža Čadež6, Gianluigi Cardinali7, Serge Casaregola8, Vishnu Chaturvedi9, Valérie Collin10, Jack W Fell11, Victoria Girard10, Marizeth Groenewald12, Ferry Hagen12, Chris Todd Hittinger13, Aleksey V Kachalkin14,15, Markus Kostrzewa16, Vassili Kouvelis17, Diego Libkind18, Xinzhan Liu3, Thomas Maier16, Wieland Meyer19,20,21,22, Gábor Péter23, Marcin Piątek24, Vincent Robert12, Carlos A Rosa25, Jose Paulo Sampaio26,27, Matthias Sipiczki28, Marc Stadler29, Takashi Sugita30, Junta Sugiyama31,32, Hiroshi Takagi33, Masako Takashima34, Benedetta Turchetti5, Qi-Ming Wang3,35, Teun Boekhout12,36.
Abstract
The unambiguous application of fungal names is important to communicate scientific findings. Names are critical for (clinical) diagnostics, legal compliance, and regulatory controls, such as biosafety, food security, quarantine regulations, and industrial applications. Consequently, the stability of the taxonomic system and the traceability of nomenclatural changes is crucial for a broad range of users and taxonomists. The unambiguous application of names is assured by the preservation of nomenclatural history and the physical organisms representing a name. Fungi are extremely diverse in terms of ecology, lifestyle, and methods of study. Predominantly unicellular fungi known as yeasts are usually investigated as living cultures. Methods to characterize yeasts include physiological (growth) tests and experiments to induce a sexual morph; both methods require viable cultures. Thus, the preservation and availability of viable reference cultures are important, and cultures representing reference material are cited in species descriptions. Historical surveys revealed drawbacks and inconsistencies between past practices and modern requirements as stated in the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICNafp). Improper typification of yeasts is a common problem, resulting in a large number invalid yeast species names. With this opinion letter, we address the problem that culturable microorganisms, notably some fungi and algae, require specific provisions under the ICNafp. We use yeasts as a prominent example of fungi known from cultures. But viable type material is important not only for yeasts, but also for other cultivable Fungi that are characterized by particular morphological structures (a specific type of spores), growth properties, and secondary metabolites. We summarize potential proposals which, in our opinion, will improve the stability of fungal names, in particular by protecting those names for which the reference material can be traced back to the original isolate.Entities:
Keywords: Culture collection; Metabolically inactive; Nomenclatural type; Typification; Viable strains
Year: 2021 PMID: 34256869 DOI: 10.1186/s43008-021-00067-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IMA Fungus ISSN: 2210-6340 Impact factor: 3.515