Literature DB >> 34256869

Nomenclatural issues concerning cultured yeasts and other fungi: why it is important to avoid unneeded name changes.

Andrey Yurkov1, Artur Alves2, Feng-Yan Bai3, Kyria Boundy-Mills4, Pietro Buzzini5, Neža Čadež6, Gianluigi Cardinali7, Serge Casaregola8, Vishnu Chaturvedi9, Valérie Collin10, Jack W Fell11, Victoria Girard10, Marizeth Groenewald12, Ferry Hagen12, Chris Todd Hittinger13, Aleksey V Kachalkin14,15, Markus Kostrzewa16, Vassili Kouvelis17, Diego Libkind18, Xinzhan Liu3, Thomas Maier16, Wieland Meyer19,20,21,22, Gábor Péter23, Marcin Piątek24, Vincent Robert12, Carlos A Rosa25, Jose Paulo Sampaio26,27, Matthias Sipiczki28, Marc Stadler29, Takashi Sugita30, Junta Sugiyama31,32, Hiroshi Takagi33, Masako Takashima34, Benedetta Turchetti5, Qi-Ming Wang3,35, Teun Boekhout12,36.   

Abstract

The unambiguous application of fungal names is important to communicate scientific findings. Names are critical for (clinical) diagnostics, legal compliance, and regulatory controls, such as biosafety, food security, quarantine regulations, and industrial applications. Consequently, the stability of the taxonomic system and the traceability of nomenclatural changes is crucial for a broad range of users and taxonomists. The unambiguous application of names is assured by the preservation of nomenclatural history and the physical organisms representing a name. Fungi are extremely diverse in terms of ecology, lifestyle, and methods of study. Predominantly unicellular fungi known as yeasts are usually investigated as living cultures. Methods to characterize yeasts include physiological (growth) tests and experiments to induce a sexual morph; both methods require viable cultures. Thus, the preservation and availability of viable reference cultures are important, and cultures representing reference material are cited in species descriptions. Historical surveys revealed drawbacks and inconsistencies between past practices and modern requirements as stated in the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (ICNafp). Improper typification of yeasts is a common problem, resulting in a large number invalid yeast species names. With this opinion letter, we address the problem that culturable microorganisms, notably some fungi and algae, require specific provisions under the ICNafp. We use yeasts as a prominent example of fungi known from cultures. But viable type material is important not only for yeasts, but also for other cultivable Fungi that are characterized by particular morphological structures (a specific type of spores), growth properties, and secondary metabolites. We summarize potential proposals which, in our opinion, will improve the stability of fungal names, in particular by protecting those names for which the reference material can be traced back to the original isolate.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture collection; Metabolically inactive; Nomenclatural type; Typification; Viable strains

Year:  2021        PMID: 34256869     DOI: 10.1186/s43008-021-00067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IMA Fungus        ISSN: 2210-6340            Impact factor:   3.515


  35 in total

1.  International bacteriological code of nomenclature.

Authors:  R E BUCHANAN; R ST JOHN-BROOKS; R S BREED
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov.

Authors:  Cletus P Kurtzman; Christie J Robnett; Eleanor Basehoar-Powers
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Saccharomyces bacillaris is not a synonym of Candida stellata: reinstatement as Starmerella bacillaris comb. nov.

Authors:  F L Duarte; N H Pimentel; A Teixeira; A Fonseca
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  New and Interesting Fungi. 2.

Authors:  P W Crous; R K Schumacher; A Akulov; R Thangavel; M Hernández-Restrepo; A J Carnegie; R Cheewangkoon; M J Wingfield; B A Summerell; W Quaedvlieg; T A Coutinho; J Roux; A R Wood; A Giraldo; J Z Groenewald
Journal:  Fungal Syst Evol       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 5.  Phylogeny of the ascomycetous yeasts and the renaming of Pichia anomala to Wickerhamomyces anomalus.

Authors:  Cletus P Kurtzman
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Molecular diversity and intragenomic variability in the yeast genus Xanthophyllomyces: the origin of Phaffia rhodozyma?

Authors:  Jack W Fell; Gloria Scorzetti; Adele Statzell-Tallman; Kyria Boundy-Mills
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  On the reclassification of species assigned to Candida and other anamorphic ascomycetous yeast genera based on phylogenetic circumscription.

Authors:  Heide-Marie Daniel; Marc-André Lachance; Cletus P Kurtzman
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.271

8.  Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses.

Authors:  Cletus P Kurtzman; Christie J Robnett
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Yeast culture collections in the twenty-first century: new opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Kyria L Boundy-Mills; Ewald Glantschnig; Ian N Roberts; Andrey Yurkov; Serge Casaregola; Heide-Marie Daniel; Marizeth Groenewald; Benedetta Turchetti
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.239

10.  How to publish a new fungal species, or name, version 3.0.

Authors:  M Catherine Aime; Andrew N Miller; Takayuki Aoki; Konstanze Bensch; Lei Cai; Pedro W Crous; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Paul M Kirk; Robert Lücking; Tom W May; Elaine Malosso; Scott A Redhead; Amy Y Rossman; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.515

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic, Phenotypic and Metabolic Diversity of Yeasts From Wheat Flag Leaves.

Authors:  Linda Gouka; Caroline Vogels; Lars H Hansen; Jos M Raaijmakers; Viviane Cordovez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  A re-assessment of Taxomyces andreanae, the alleged taxol-producing fungus, using comparative genomics.

Authors:  Tian Cheng; Miroslav Kolařík; Luis Quijada; Marc Stadler
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.044

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.