Literature DB >> 33197830

Effective dose from radiation exposure in medicine: Past, present, and future.

Colin J Martin1, John D Harrison2, Madan M Rehani3.   

Abstract

Effective dose (E) has been developed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) as a dose quantity with a link to risks of health detriment, mainly cancer. It is based on reference phantoms representing average individuals, but this is often forgotten in its application to medical exposures, for which its use sometimes goes beyond the intended purpose. There has been much debate about issues involved in the use of E in medicine and ICRP is preparing a publication with more information on this application. This article aims to describe the development of E and explain how it should be used in medicine. It discusses some of the issues that arise when E is applied to medical exposures and provides information on how its use might evolve in the future. The article concludes with responses to some frequently asked questions about uses of E that are in line with the forthcoming ICRP publication. The main use of E in medicine is in meaningful comparison of doses from different types of procedure not possible with measurable dose quantities. However, it can be used, with appropriate care, as a measure of possible cancer risks. When considering E to individual patients, it is important to note that the dose received will differ from that assessed for reference phantoms, and the risk per Sv is likely to be greater on average in children and less in older adults. Newer techniques allow the calculation of patient-specific E which should be distinguished from the reference quantity.
Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Dose coefficients; Effective dose; Patient dosimetry; Reference phantoms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33197830     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  9 in total

1.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 3.  The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Donald Frush
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 4.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Patient Size-Dependent Dosimetry Methodology Applied to 18F-FDG Using New ICRP Mesh Phantoms.

Authors:  Lukas M Carter; Chansoo Choi; Simone Krebs; Bradley Jay Beattie; Chan Hyeong Kim; Heiko Schoder; Wesley E Bolch; Adam Leon Kesner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Probability of receiving a high cumulative radiation dose and primary clinical indication of CT examinations: a 5-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Hub Boere; Bart A J M Wagemans; Patty J Nelemans; Estelle C Nijssen; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Joachim E Wildberger; Anna M Sailer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Statement of the Italian Association of Medical Physics (AIFM) task group on radiation dose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Francesco Ria; Loredana D'Ercole; Daniela Origgi; Nicoletta Paruccini; Luisa Pierotti; Osvaldo Rampado; Veronica Rossetti; Sabina Strocchi; Alberto Torresin
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 8.  Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Guy Frija; Reinhard Loose; Graciano Paulo; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Claudio Granata; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 9.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.