Literature DB >> 32693353

Estimates of the number of patients with high cumulative doses through recurrent CT exams in 35 OECD countries.

Madan M Rehani1, Michael Hauptmann2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the number of patients in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries who receive a cumulative effective dose (CED) ≥ 100 mSv from recurrent computed tomography (CT) exams.
METHODS: Taking into account recently published data on the number of CTs per patient and the fraction of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv as well as country-specific data for the number of CT exams/1,000 population from OECD publication, this paper makes estimations for 35 OECD countries.
RESULTS: The estimated total number of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv for all 35 OECD countries combined in a 5-year period is around 2.5 million (2,493,685) in a population of 1.2 billion (1,176,641,900), i.e., 0.21% of the population. Expressed per 1,000 population, the range is from 0.51 for Finland to 2.94 for the US, a nearly six-fold difference. Countries with more than 2 patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv in a 5-yr period per 1,000 population are: Belgium, France, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey, and US.
CONCLUSIONS: The first estimates of the number of patients likely receiving CED ≥ 100 mSv through recurrent CT exams in 35 OECD countries indicate that 2.5 million patients reach this level in a 5-year period. There is an urgent need for various stakeholders including medical physicists, referring physicians, health policy makers, manufacturers of CT equipment and epidemiologists to attend to the issue in the interest of patient radiation safety.
Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT imaging; Cumulative effective dose; Effective dose; High cumulative dose; OECD countries; Patient radiation safety; Radiation dose

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32693353     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  14 in total

1.  Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; John Heil; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Analysis of patients receiving ≥ 100 mSv during a computed tomography intervention.

Authors:  Ronald S Arellano; Kai Yang; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The radiation doses and radiation protection on the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures.

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Agnieszka Kuchcińska; Roberta Matheoud; Alfredo Muni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 6.  The cumulative radiation dose paradigm in pediatric imaging.

Authors:  Donald Frush
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 7.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 8.  Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Guy Frija; Reinhard Loose; Graciano Paulo; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Claudio Granata; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 9.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Madan M Rehani; Yasutaka Chiba; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Atsushi Nakai; Shunsuke Omoto; Kosuke Minaga; Ken Kamata; Kentaro Yamao; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.