Literature DB >> 34253610

A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers.

Edward Asiedu1, Dean Karlan2, Monica Lambon-Quayefio3, Christopher Udry4.   

Abstract

Ethics in social science experimentation and data collection are often discussed but rarely articulated in writing as part of research outputs. Although papers typically reference human subjects research approvals from relevant institutional review boards, most recognize that such boards do not carry out comprehensive ethical assessments. We propose a structured ethics appendix to provide details on the following: policy equipoise, role of the researcher, potential harms to participants and nonparticipants, conflicts of interest, intellectual freedom, feedback to participants, and foreseeable misuse of research results. We discuss each of these and some of the norms and challenging situations of each. We believe that discussing such issues explicitly in appendices of papers, even if briefly, will serve two purposes: more complete communication of ethics can improve discussions of papers and can clarify and improve the norms themselves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; methodology; primary data collection; randomized controlled trials; surveys

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34253610      PMCID: PMC8307908          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024570118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Charles Weijer
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

2.  So-called "clinical equipoise" and the argument from design.

Authors:  Fred Gifford
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

3.  Being surveyed can change later behavior and related parameter estimates.

Authors:  Alix Peterson Zwane; Jonathan Zinman; Eric Van Dusen; William Pariente; Clair Null; Edward Miguel; Michael Kremer; Dean S Karlan; Richard Hornbeck; Xavier Giné; Esther Duflo; Florencia Devoto; Bruno Crepon; Abhijit Banerjee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Is consent to participate in research voluntary?

Authors:  S E Hewlett
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1996-10

5.  Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research.

Authors:  B Freedman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Ethics in field experimentation: A call to establish new standards to protect the public from unwanted manipulation and real harms.

Authors:  Rose McDermott; Peter K Hatemi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The ethics of public policy RCTs: The principle of policy equipoise.

Authors:  Douglas MacKay
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  Clinical equipoise and the incoherence of research ethics.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Howard Brody
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

9.  It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Julia Wade; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences.

Authors:  Nicola Mills; Jane M Blazeby; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; Bruce Campbell; Caroline Wilson; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cash, COVID-19 and aid cuts: a mixed-method impact evaluation among South Sudanese refugees registered in Kiryandongo settlement, Uganda.

Authors:  Daniel Stein; Rico Bergemann; Heather Lanthorn; Emma Kimani; Emmanuel Nshakira-Rukundo; Yulei Li
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-05

2.  Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources.

Authors:  Paul J Ferraro; Arun Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.