| Literature DB >> 29023957 |
Abstract
In this article, I ask whether a principle analogous to the principle of clinical equipoise should govern the design and conduct of RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of policy interventions. I answer this question affirmatively, and introduce and defend the principle of policy equipoise. According to this principle, all arms of a policy RCT must be, at minimum, in a state of equipoise with the best proven policy that is also morally and practically attainable and sustainable. For all arms of a policy RCT, policy experts must either (1) reasonably disagree about whether the trial arms are more effective than this policy, or (2) know that they are.Keywords: equipoise; public policy; research ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29023957 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioethics ISSN: 0269-9702 Impact factor: 1.898