Joël Greffier1,2, Aymeric Hamard3, Fabricio Pereira3, Corinne Barrau4, Hugo Pasquier5, Jean Paul Beregi3, Julien Frandon3. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France. joel.greffier@chu-nimes.fr. 2. Department of Medical Physics, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France. joel.greffier@chu-nimes.fr. 3. Department of Medical Imaging, CHU Nimes, Medical Imaging Group Nimes, Univ Montpellier, EA 2415, Bd Prof Robert Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France. 4. Department of Medical Physics, CHU Nimes, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 5. GE Healthcare, Buc, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on image quality and dose reduction of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. METHODS: Data acquisitions were performed at seven dose levels (CTDIvol : 15/10/7.5/5/2.5/1/0.5 mGy) using a standard phantom designed for image quality assessment. Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), two levels of IR (ASiR-V50% (AV50); ASiR-V100% (AV100)), and three levels of DLIR (TrueFidelity™ low, medium, high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index (d') was computed to model a large mass in the liver, a small calcification, and a small subtle lesion with low contrast. RESULTS: NPS peaks were higher with AV50 than with all DLIR levels and only higher with DLIR-H than with AV100. The average NPS spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR than with IR. For all DLIR levels, TTF50% obtained with DLIR was higher than that with IR. d' was higher with DLIR than with AV50 but lower with DLIR-L and DLIR-M than with AV100. d' values were higher with DLIR-H than with AV100 for the small low-contrast lesion (10 ± 4%) and in the same range for the other simulated lesions. CONCLUSIONS: New DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture. Images obtained with DLIR seem to indicate a greater potential for dose optimization than those with hybrid IR. KEY POINTS: • This study assessed the impact on image quality and radiation dose of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm as compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The new DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without perceived alteration of the texture, commonly reported with IR. • As compared with IR, DLIR seems to open further possibility of dose optimization.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact on image quality and dose reduction of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with a hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. METHODS: Data acquisitions were performed at seven dose levels (CTDIvol : 15/10/7.5/5/2.5/1/0.5 mGy) using a standard phantom designed for image quality assessment. Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), two levels of IR (ASiR-V50% (AV50); ASiR-V100% (AV100)), and three levels of DLIR (TrueFidelity™ low, medium, high). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed. Detectability index (d') was computed to model a large mass in the liver, a small calcification, and a small subtle lesion with low contrast. RESULTS: NPS peaks were higher with AV50 than with all DLIR levels and only higher with DLIR-H than with AV100. The average NPS spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR than with IR. For all DLIR levels, TTF50% obtained with DLIR was higher than that with IR. d' was higher with DLIR than with AV50 but lower with DLIR-L and DLIR-M than with AV100. d' values were higher with DLIR-H than with AV100 for the small low-contrast lesion (10 ± 4%) and in the same range for the other simulated lesions. CONCLUSIONS: New DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without changing the noise texture. Images obtained with DLIR seem to indicate a greater potential for dose optimization than those with hybrid IR. KEY POINTS: • This study assessed the impact on image quality and radiation dose of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm as compared with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm. • The new DLIR algorithm reduced noise and improved spatial resolution and detectability without perceived alteration of the texture, commonly reported with IR. • As compared with IR, DLIR seems to open further possibility of dose optimization.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep learning; Image enhancement; Image reconstruction; Multidetector computed tomography
Authors: Ji Eun Lee; Seo-Youn Choi; Jeong Ah Hwang; Sanghyeok Lim; Min Hee Lee; Boem Ha Yi; Jang Gyu Cha Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 1.889