Literature DB >> 35502370

The influence of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the image quality and auto-analysis of pulmonary nodules at ultra-low dose chest CT: a phantom study.

Xiaohui Li1, Lei Deng1, Yue Yao1, Baobin Guo1, Jianying Li2, Quanxin Yang1.   

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm on the detection, characterization and image quality of pulmonary nodules (PNs) in ultra-low dose chest computed tomography (CT) in comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) algorithm.
Methods: Nine artificial pulmonary nodules [six ground glass nodules (GGNs) and three solid nodules (SNs); density: -800 HU, -630 HU, 100 HU; diameter: 12 mm, 10 mm, 8 mm] were randomly placed in a thorax anthropomorphic phantom (Lungman, Kyoto Kagaku Inc.) and scanned on a 256-row CT (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare). Eight scans were performed at 70 kVp with different tube currents (20, 30, 50, 70, 90, 100, 120, 150 mA). Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V (30%, 50%, 80%) and DLIR (Low, Medium, High; TrueFidelity™) at 0.625 mm thickness. The effective radiation dose was recorded. All images were automatically analyzed using a commercially available artificial intelligence software (Intelligent 4D Imaging System for Chest CT 5.5, YITU Healthcare) and CT value, standard deviation (SD), long and short diameters of each nodule and SD of air (background) were measured. The detection rate, deformation degree (long diameter/short diameter), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pulmonary nodules were calculated.
Results: Nodule CT values were the same in all mA settings for all three types of reconstruction algorithms (all P>0.05). DLIR groups had significantly lower SD and higher SNR and CNR values, with better overall image quality than ASIR-V and FBP groups at each mA, ranging from 65-85% reduction in SD, 67-83% increase in SNR with DLIR-H over 50%ASIR-V and 75-91% reduction in SD and 77-89% increase in SNR with DLIR-H over FBP (all P<0.05). At ultra-low dose conditions (30 mA), the DLIR-H images had the highest detection rate of PNs (100%). In addition, the DLIR-M had a minimal negative effect on the characterization of PNs. Conclusions: DLIR algorithm can be a potential reconstruction technique to optimize image quality and improve detection rate of PNs in ultra-low dose lung screening. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography (CT); deep learning; image reconstruction; pulmonary nodule (PN)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35502370      PMCID: PMC9014152          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  28 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--old ideas and new technology.

Authors:  Dominik Fleischmann; F Edward Boas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of CT effective dose and convolution kernel on the detection of pulmonary nodules in different artificial intelligence software systems: A phantom study.

Authors:  Binjie Fu; Guoshu Wang; Mingyue Wu; Wangjia Li; Yineng Zheng; Zhigang Chu; Fajin Lv
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Sarah DeMello; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Brenda Brewer; Timothy R Church; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine A Gatsonis; David S Gierada; Amanda Jain; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; Joshua M Rathmell; JoRean Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prognosis and survival in resected lung carcinoma based on the new international staging system.

Authors:  T Naruke; T Goya; R Tsuchiya; K Suemasu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Huilong Liu; Xi Yu; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

6.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V: Impact on Image Quality in Ultralow-Dose Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Fran Mikulicic; Jan Vontobel; Tobias A Fuchs; Mathias Possner; Olivier F Clerc; Julia Stehli; Oliver Gaemperli; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Image quality in CT: From physical measurements to model observers.

Authors:  F R Verdun; D Racine; J G Ott; M J Tapiovaara; P Toroi; F O Bochud; W J H Veldkamp; A Schegerer; R W Bouwman; I Hernandez Giron; N W Marshall; S Edyvean
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.685

8.  Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening strategies: a comparative modeling study for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Harry J de Koning; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; Kevin ten Haaf; Vidit N Munshi; Jihyoun Jeon; Saadet Ayca Erdogan; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Sung Eun Choi; Paul F Pinsky; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Martin C Tammemägi; William D Hazelton; Eric J Feuer; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Paul Pinsky; Hrudaya Nath; Caroline Chiles; Fenghai Duan; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Peter B Noël
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.