Literature DB >> 34249503

Heterogeneity of gut microbial responses in healthy household dogs transitioning from an extruded to a mildly cooked diet.

Jirayu Tanprasertsuk1, Justin Shmalberg1,2, Heather Maughan1,3, Devon E Tate1, LeeAnn M Perry1, Aashish R Jha1,4, Ryan W Honaker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiota (GM) is associated with canine health and can be impacted by diet. Dog owners in the U.S. have increasingly shown an interest in feeding their dogs a mildly cooked (MC) diet. However, its impact on canine GM and health remains largely unknown.
METHODS: Healthy household dogs were tracked upon switching from various brands of extruded to MC diets for four weeks. A health assessment was completed and stool samples were collected by each owner before (day 0) and after the diet transition (day 28). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed at both time points to characterize the GM.
RESULTS: Dogs completed the study by either completing the health assessments (n = 31) or providing stool samples at both time points (n = 28). All owners reported either better or no change in overall health at the end of the study (61% and 39%, respectively), and none reported worse overall health. Defecation frequency was also reported to be lower (58%) or about the same (35%). Principal coordinate (PCo) analysis showed a significant shift (p = 0.004) in the β-diversity of the GM upon diet transition (34.2% and 10.3% explained by the first two axes). The abundances of 70 species increased after the diet change (adjusted p < 0.05), 67% and 24% of which belonged to the Lactobacillales and the Enterobacterales orders respectively. The abundances of 28 species decreased (adjusted p < 0.05), 46%, 18%, and 11% of which belonged to the Clostridiales, Bacillales, and Bacteroidales orders, respectively. Lower Lactobacillales and Enterobacterales, and higher Bacteroidales at baseline were associated with a greater shift along the PCo1 axis. Protein content of the baseline diet was correlated with the shift along the PCo1 axis (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSION: Owners reported either improvement or no change in health in dogs transitioning from extruded kibble to MC diets for 4 weeks, but this report of health perception requires further exploration in a controlled trial. Diet change also led to a significant shift in the GM profile of healthy dogs. The magnitude of shift was associated with baseline GM and dietary protein, and warrants further examination of individualized responses and personalized nutrition in companion dogs. These results also support future investigation of the impact of a MC diet on health maintenance given its increasing popularity.
© 2021 Tanprasertsuk et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine microbiome; Canine nutrition; Diet processing; Dog kibble; Fresh food; Pet food

Year:  2021        PMID: 34249503      PMCID: PMC8254476          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  65 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic use of fish oils in companion animals.

Authors:  John E Bauer
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Comparison of the guaranteed analysis with the measured nutrient composition of commercial pet foods.

Authors:  Richard C Hill; Christina J Choate; Karen C Scott; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  KEGG Mapper for inferring cellular functions from protein sequences.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Yoko Sato
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Effects of prebiotic inulin-type fructans on blood metabolite and hormone concentrations and faecal microbiota and metabolites in overweight dogs.

Authors:  Celeste Alexander; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Saravanan Devendran; Franka Neumer; Stephan Theis; Jason M Ridlon; Jan S Suchodolski; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  The effects of increasing water content to reduce the energy density of the diet on body mass changes following caloric restriction in domestic cats.

Authors:  K M Cameron; P J Morris; R M Hackett; J R Speakman
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 2.130

Review 6.  Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine.

Authors:  Petra Louis; Harry J Flint
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  The microbiota of healthy dogs demonstrates individualized responses to synbiotic supplementation in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jirayu Tanprasertsuk; Aashish R Jha; Justin Shmalberg; Roshonda B Jones; LeeAnn M Perry; Heather Maughan; Ryan W Honaker
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Key bacterial families (Clostridiaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae and Bacteroidaceae) are related to the digestion of protein and energy in dogs.

Authors:  Emma N Bermingham; Paul Maclean; David G Thomas; Nicholas J Cave; Wayne Young
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Diets with and without edible cricket support a similar level of diversity in the gut microbiome of dogs.

Authors:  Jessica K Jarett; Anne Carlson; Mariana Rossoni Serao; Jessica Strickland; Laurie Serfilippi; Holly H Ganz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of a mildly cooked human-grade dog diet on gene expression, skin and coat health measures, and fecal microbiota of healthy adult dogs.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Geary; Patrícia M Oba; Catherine C Applegate; Lindsay V Clark; Christopher J Fields; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Analysis and Comparison of Gut Microbiome in Young Detection Dogs.

Authors:  Zongjie Li; Qing Sun; Yuhao Li; Zhixin Guan; Jianchao Wei; Beibei Li; Ke Liu; Donghua Shao; Rongsheng Mi; Haixia Liu; Yafeng Qiu; Zhiyong Ma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.