| Literature DB >> 34249273 |
Hossein Farhadnejad1, Hadi Emamat2, Farshad Teymoori1,3, Hadith Tangestani4, Azita Hekmatdoost2, Parvin Mirmiran5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This systematic review was conducted to review the studies investigating the role of dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) diet in prevalence and progression of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children, adolescents, and adults.Entities:
Keywords: DASH diet; dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet; metabolic syndrome; systematic review
Year: 2021 PMID: 34249273 PMCID: PMC8218795 DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_108_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Prev Med ISSN: 2008-7802
Figure 1Flowchart of identification of included observational and interventional studies
Summary of results of cohort studies (n=2) on the DASH diet and metabolic syndrome
| Authors, year, and reference | Country | Sample Size ( | Follow-up | Age years | Sex | DASH diet score definition (components) | Assessment of the metabolic syndrome | Results | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pimenta | Spain | 6851 | 8.3 years | adults | Men/women | DASH diet (+): whole grain, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products, (−): red and processed meat, sweetened beverages, and sodium DASH score range: 8-40 | AHA/NHLBI | Greater Adherence to DASH diet: ↓ Incidence of MetS, but only if they had low alcohol intake ((RR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20-0.85), ( | 9 |
| Asghari | Iran | 425 | 3.6 years | 6-18 | Girls/sons | DASH diet (+): whole grain, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products, (−): red and processed meat, sweetened beverages, and sodium DASH score range: 8-40 | JIS | High Adherence to DASH diet: ↓ Incidence of MetS ((OR: 0.36,95%%CI: 0.14-0.94), ( | 9 |
Characteristics of clinical trials (n=4) that assessed the effect of the DASH diet on the development of the metabolic syndrome
| Authors, year, and reference | Sample Size ( | Country | Follow-up | Age years | Sex | Intervention | Assessment of the metabolic syndrome | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azadbakht | 116 | Iran | 6 months | Adults | Men/women | Three diets were prescribed for 6 months: 1) a control diet, 2) a weight-reducing diet, 3) the DASH diet with reduced calories and increased consumption of fruit, vegetables, low-fat dairy, and whole grains and lower in saturated fat, total fat, and cholesterol and restricted to 2,400 mg Na. | ATP III | In compared to control diet, the DASH diet resulted in higher HDL-C, lower TGs, SBP, weight, FBG among men and women. |
| Saneei | 60 | Iran | 6Ws intervention 4Ws washout 6Ws intervention | 11-18 | Girls | Sixty post pubescent adolescent girls with the MetS were randomized to either a DASH style diet or usual dietary advice for 6 weeks. | ATP III modified for children and adolescents | Changes in SBP, TGs, FPG, HDL-C, weight, WC and BMI were not significantly different between the two groups. The DASH diet prevented the increase in DBP compared with UDA ( |
| Hikmat | 410 | United states | 8 weeks | ≥ 22 | Men/women | Participants were classified based on MetS status and were randomized to receive a control diet (a diet rich in fruits and vegetables) or the DASH diet. | ATP III | In the MS subgroup, the DASH diet compared with the control diet reduced systolic BP by 4.9 mm Hg ( |
| Choi | 39 Intervention: 21 Control: 18 | Korea | 8 weeks | ≥ 60 | Women | The treatment group received a weekly tailored nutritional program and the control group received only one educational session. | NCEP-ATP III modified for Asian Pacific Region | The oxidative stress ( |
MetS=Metabolic syndrome, DASH=Dietary approach to stop hypertension, Ws=Weeks, UDA=Usual dietary advices, LDL-C=Low density lipoprotein, -cholesterol, HDL-C=High density lipoprotein, -cholesterol, TGs=Triglycerides, SBP=Systolic blood pressure, DBP=Diastolic blood pressure, FPG=Fasting plasma glucose, WC=Waist circumference, BMI=Body mass index
Summary of results of cross-sectional study (n=6) on the DASH diet and metabolic syndrome
| Authors, year, and reference | Sample Size ( | Country | Age years | Sex | DASH diet score definition (components) | Assessment of the metabolic syndrome | Results | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joyce | 10741 | United States | 18-74 | Men/women | DASH diet (+):total and whole grains, vegetables (excluding potatoes), fruits (including juice), dairy, nuts/seeds/legumes, (−): red/processed meat, fats/oils, and sweets
| AHA/NHLBI 2009 JIS | There is no associations between DASH and MetS prevalence in all population study(OR: 0.95, 95%CI: 0.88, 1.02). | 7 |
| Ghorabi | 396 | Iran | ≥18 | Men/women | DASH diet (+): fruits, vegetables, nuts and legume, dairy products, and low intake of grains, (−):sugar-sweetened beverages and sweets, sodium, and red and processed meats | NCEP | Higher adherence to DASH diet: ↓ odds of MetS (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.54) | 6 |
| Kang | 6826 | Korea | 49-70 | Women | Protein, fat, fiber, calcium, potassium, and sodium | ATP III | Every increase in the DASH-KQ score by 1 exhibited a 0.977-fold odds for metabolic syndrome. | 7 |
| Drehmer | 10010 | Brazil | 35-74 | Men/women | DASH diet (+): whole grain, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products, (−): red and processed meat, sweetened beverages, and sodium | JIS | Higher Adherence to the DASH Diet: ↓ odds of MetS ((OR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.74-1.05), (P for trend: 0.044)) | 7 |
| Park YM | 2767 | United States | 20-90 | Men/women | DASH diet (+): protein, fiber, magnesium, calcium, and potassium,(−): total fat, saturated fat, sodium, and cholesterol | ATP-III | Higher DASH index was associated with lower odds of MONW phenotype :((OR: 0.59, 95% CI, 0.38-0.93); | 7 |
| Saneei | 420 | Iran | >30 | Women | DASH diet (+): fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes, low-fat dairy products, and whole grains, (−): sodium, sweetened beverages, and red and processed meats | JIS | Higher DASH diet score was associated with lower odds of MetS: (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14-0.91) | 5 |
(+)=Positive component, (−)=Negative component. DASH=Dietary approach to stop hypertension; MetS=Metabolic syndrome; OR=Odds ratio; CI=Confidence interval; ATP III=Adult Treatment Panel III; AHA=American Heart Association; NCEP=National Cholesterol Education Program; JIS=Joint Interim Societies; NHLBI=National Heart Lung and Blood Institute; MONW=Metabolic obese normal weight
Quality assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies†
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Study score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of The exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study | Assessment of outcome | Was follow- up Long enough For the outcome to occur? | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | |||
| Asghari, | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9/9 |
| Pimenta | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9/9 |
†Study score <4 indicates low quality, a score of 4 to 6 represents moderate, and a score of more than 6 indicates as a good quality
Quality assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cross-sectional studies*
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Study score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of The exposed sample | Sample size | Ascertainment of exposure | Selection of the non-exposed sample | Assessment of outcome | Suitability of statistical test | |||
| Ghorabi | * | - | * | * | ** | * | * | 7/7 |
| Joyce | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7/7 |
| kang | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7/7 |
| Drehmer | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7/7 |
| Park | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | 7/7 |
| Saneei | - | - | * | * | ** | * | * | 6/7 |
*We used a modified NOS scale for cross sectional studies. Note: A score of 7 was considered as good quality
Quality assessment of clinical trials according to the Jadad scale
| Random sequence generation (Selection Bias) | Allocation concealment (Selection Bias) | Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | Blinding of outcome assessment (Detection bias) | Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Selective outcome reporting | Other bias | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azadbakht, 2005 | |||||||
| Saneei, 2013 | |||||||
| Hikmat, 2014 | |||||||
| Choi, 2015 |
Noted=Risk of bias level: low (green), unclear (yellow), high (red)
Methodological characteristics of the diet scores used to assessed the association of DASH with MetS
| Author | Year | Number of components | Scoring system | Range | Components |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asghari | 2016 | 8 | 5 partitions for each component | 8-40 | (+): whole grain, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products, (−): red and processed meat, sweetened beverages, and sodium |
| Joyce | 2019 | 8 | 10 partitions for each component | 0-80 | (+): grains, vegetables, fruit, dairy, and nuts/seeds/legumes, (−): red/processed meat, fats/oils, and sweets |
| Ghorabi | 2019 | 8 | 10 partitions for each component | 8-80 | (+): fruits, vegetables, nuts and legume, dairy products, grains, (−): sugar-sweetened beverages and sweets, sodium, and red and processed meats |
| Kang | 2018 | 6 | 4 partitions for each component | 6-24 | Protein, fat, fiber, calcium, potassium, and sodium |
| Drehmer | 2017 | 8 | 5 partitions for each component | 8-40 | (+): fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, (−): sodium, red and processed meats, and sweetened beverages |
| Park YM | 2017 | 9 | 0 and 1 points | 0-9 | Saturated fat, total fat, protein, cholesterol, fiber, magnesium, calcium, potassium, and sodium |
| Saneei | 2015 | 8 | 5 partitions for each component | 8-40 | (+): fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes, low-fat dairy products, and whole grains, (−): sodium, sweetened beverages, and red and processed meats |
| Pimenta | 2015 | 8 | 5 partitions for each component | 8-40 | (+): whole grain, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products, (−): red and processed meat, sweetened beverages, and sodium |
(+)=Positive component; (−)=Negative component