Literature DB >> 34239266

Neuropilin-1: A feasible link between liver pathologies and COVID-19.

Aitor Benedicto1, Iñigo García-Kamiruaga2, Beatriz Arteta3.   

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has a tremendous impact on the health of millions of people worldwide. Unfortunately, those suffering from previous pathological conditions are more vulnerable and tend to develop more severe disease upon infection with the new SARS-CoV-2. This coronavirus interacts with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor to invade the cells. Recently, another receptor, neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), has been reported to amplify the viral infection. Interestingly, NRP-1 is expressed in nonparenchymal liver cells and is related to and upregulated in a wide variety of liver-related pathologies. It has been observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection promotes liver injury through several pathways that may be influenced by the previous pathological status of the patient and liver expression of NRP-1. Moreover, coronavirus disease 2019 causes an inflammatory cascade called cytokine storm in patients with severe disease. This cytokine storm may influence liver sinusoidal-cell phenotype, facilitating viral invasion. In this review, the shreds of evidence linking NRP-1 with liver pathologies such as hepatocellular carcinoma, liver fibrosis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and inflammatory disorders are discussed in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, the involvement of the infection-related cytokine storm in NRP-1 overexpression and the subsequent increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection are also analyzed. This review aims to shed some light on the involvement of liver NRP-1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection and emphasizes the possible involvement this receptor with the observed liver damage. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Hepatic stellate cells; Liver; Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells; Pathology; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34239266      PMCID: PMC8240058          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i24.3516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core Tip: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) receptors to infect cells. NRP-1 expression is upregulated in several liver pathologies, which may facilitate viral infection. Moreover, the cytokine storm might increase liver permeability and NRP-1 expression, giving rise to an increased severity of infection and a worse prognosis.

INTRODUCTION

The identification of a new coronavirus from patients suffering from an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown origin in the city of Wuhan, China, in December 2019[1], alarmed the scientific and medical community. This coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), spread all over the globe, becoming a public health emergency and a pandemic that has paralyzed the world for a year. Moreover, the high incidence of newly infected individuals has pushed health systems worldwide to the limit, with a continuous influx of patients requiring hospitalization because of complications related to this new coronavirus. After the chaotic initial months of the pandemic, an increasing number of studies have shown that the severity of SARS-CoV-2 is directly related to the health status of the infected individuals[2] and also with gender[3]. Severe complications and an increased risk of mortality have been linked with various pathologies[2,4] including obesity, diabetes, lung disease, and hypertension[2,4-7]. SARS-CoV-2 invades the mucosal cells of the host, mainly through the nose and mouth. Once in the body, SARS-CoV-2 infects the epithelial cells of the nasal cavity using a specific receptor present in those cells[8]. In detail, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein expressed in the membrane of the epithelial cell surface serves as the entry for the spike protein of the coronavirus, facilitating the infection[2,8]. Once in the cell, SARS-CoV-2 kidnaps the genetic machinery of the host cell to increase its copy number, leading to virus amplification. Interestingly, there is recent evidence of another SARS-CoV-2 receptor expressed on the surface of host cells during infection, neuropilin-1 (NRP-1)[9,10]. NRP-1 is a non-tyrosine kinase receptor isoform of the NRP protein family, which also includes NRP2. These transmembrane glycoproteins consist of a common short cytoplasmic domain and a large extracellular domain of 840 amino acid residues[11]. NRPs are present in all vertebrates and initially found in neurons, where they function as adhesion molecules[12]. NRPs lack catalytic activity, but they closely interact with the cytosolic adaptor protein synectin or GIPC1[13] to participate in signaling events. NRPs play a critical role during vasculogenesis[14,15] because of their ability to interact with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)[16]. NRP-1 also interacts with transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)[17] to regulate a broad spectrum of processes under both normal physiological conditions and pathological responses. The findings led to an increasing number of studies of NRPs in health and disease that have shown their involvement in diverse diseases, including pathologic angiogenesis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and cancer[18-22]. The expression of NRPs is upregulated in those diseases, which suggests that they are potential therapeutic targets. NRP-1 was initially found in the nervous system, but is expressed in many cell types in tissues of the heart, lung, pancreas, skeletal muscle, and liver. This widespread expression has put NRP-1 under the spotlight because of evidence that it facilitates the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells[9,10] and increases the extent of infection. The pathologies associated with NRP-1 are common to several organs, and many involve the liver, including fibrosis, cirrhosis, malignancies (hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastasis, cholangiocarcinoma, and others), and angiogenesis. NRP-1 is expressed in liver-resident cells, especially nonparenchymal cells, such as liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) and hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Some NRP-1 ligands are involved in liver pathologies. For example, VEGF mediates the angiogenic response of LSECs[23] and is associated with metastatic growth[24]. Another NRP-1 ligand, TGF-β, mediates the activation of HSCs during fibrogenesis[25,26], leading to liver fibrosis and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling during liver metastasis and the creation of a premetastatic niche[27]. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is also involved in HSC activation, a required step in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis, cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastasis, and HCC[28-31]. It is tempting to hypothesize that the increased expression of NRP-1 in the liver under both physiological conditions and in patients with liver diseases modulates coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This review summarizes the potential implications of liver expression of NRP-1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection and its possible role in COVID-19 disease progression and severity.

NRP-1 AND THE LIVER: FOCUS ON NONPARENCHYMAL CELLS

The liver is a functionally complex organ that not only maintains metabolic homeostasis but also has immune functions, such as the elimination of pathogens. Recently, NRP-1 has been identified as a facilitating receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. As it is expressed in some types of liver cells, it may affect the status of liver disease in COVID-19 patients[10]. Liver functions are carried out by a number of different cell populations, including hepatocytes, which make up about 92.5% of the liver volume[32], and nonparenchymal cells that include LSECs, Kupffer cells (KCs)[33], and HSCs[34]. Small, but important percentages of leukocytes, such as natural killer (NK) cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and T cells[35,36]. NRP-1 expression has been detected in LSECs[37] and HSCs[38] in the adult liver. Although the expression of NRP-1 is weak in HSCs, it increases following activation associated with diseases with various etiologies. NRP-1 expression in HSCs will be discussed in later sections. Bergé et al[39] reported that NRP-1 was not expressed in the hepatocytes of healthy adult livers[39]. Aung et al[40] reported weak expression in the cytoplasm of adult hepatocytes but no expression in KCs[40]. There is no doubt of the NRP-1 expression in fetal hepatic monocytes observed by Rantakari et al[41] and the absence of NRP-1 in adult hepatic macrophages. Hepatic sinusoidal endothelium is characterized by the presence of fenestrae and the absence of a true basement membrane. This characteristic of LSECs allows direct contact between blood components and other hepatic cell types[42]. In the fetal liver, NRP-1 is expressed in LSECs in close association with plasmalemma vesicle associated protein (also known as PV-1 and MECA32) during biogenesis of the fenestra, an association that is lost in the adult liver[43]. In fetal LSECs, plasmalemma vesicle associated protein forms additional associations with components of the VEGF signaling pathway. Despite the unknown functional implication of this association, mice deficient in this protein present with significant leukocyte infiltration and an evident steatosis[44]. NRP-1 is expressed in HSCs, but its expression is largely confined to LSECs and co-distributed with that of VEGFR in normal liver tissue. NRP-1 regulates the expression of VEGFR2 at both the transcriptional and post-translational levels by the activation of focal adhesion kinase. The activation of NRP-1 in LSECs thus initiates multiple intracellular signal transduction pathways that regulate cell proliferation, survival, and migration, which are essential for angiogenesis[20]. During physiological aging, the expression of NRP-1 increases in LSECs and is associated with factors present in the lumens of the sinusoids. NRP-1 interacts with hypoxic inducing factor (HIF)-2α to suppress anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory pathways that are correlated with profibrotic aggregation of macrophages and platelets. The inhibition of NRP-1 or its association with HIF-2α normalizes the profibrotic niche, with restores the regenerative ability of the liver[45]. It is interesting to note that during aging, LSECs undergo a pseudo capillarization associated with a decrease in endocytic capacity and an increase in leukocyte adhesion, with reduced liver perfusion[46]. However, whether there is a direct relationship between increased expression of NRP-1 in LSECs or pseudo capillarization with a decrease in endocytic capacity is unknown at this time. The presence of multiple ligands for NRP-1 underscores the importance of this receptor in the liver environment[47]. During adulthood, liver vascularization is stimulated by low blood flow associated with an increase in VEGF and the consequent proliferation of LSECs[48]. Under physiological conditions, hepatic angiogenesis that takes place during regeneration contributes to the formation of new functional sinusoids. As a VEGF coreceptor NRP-1 is the main mediator of angiogenesis[48], although the role of this coreceptor in intrahepatic angiogenesis is currently unclear. NRP-1 may regulate the action of VEGF on vascular permeability, the proliferation of endothelial cells, and leukocyte adhesion. Some studies suggest that NRP-1 acts independently of VEGFR2 or modulates its activity by stimulating cell migration and adhesion, which are essential for the development of an angiogenic response. In addition to its direct action on VEGFR phosphorylation, NRP-1 indirectly stimulates the VEGFR-dependent angiogenic pathway by preventing the binding of VEGF and its decoy receptor, placental growth factor[16,49]. The interaction of NRP-1 with VEGFR and VEGF is dependent on heparin, which can alter VEGF signaling in endothelial cells to either stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis[50]. Heparin is an anticoagulant that is synthesized in the body, eliminated by receptor-mediated endocytosis in LSECs, and accumulates in the liver. The formation of complexes consisting of heparin and other proteins has important clinical implications[51]. Heparin increases the binding of VEGF with the VEGFR/NRP-1[52] complex and the binding of NRP-1 to placental growth factor-2[53,54] by increasing the number of binding sites without affecting the affinity itself. As mentioned previously, hepatic macrophages in the adult liver do not express NRP-1. However, they do produce a wide range of angiogenic factors that interact with NRP-1, including HIF-2α and VEGF in addition to TGFβ[55], which requires extracellular activation by NRP-1 to increase its affinity for its receptors. The effects of TGFβ on angiogenesis depend on the receptor with which it interacts. Both receptors are expressed in LSECs, suggesting a balancing function in the angiogenic process. The signaling pathways initiated after the interaction of TGFβ with its receptor are highly dependent on the specific microenvironment in the liver at the time. Indeed, signaling via TFGβ receptor binding of anaplastic lymphoma kinase promotes angiogenesis; while the interaction with activin receptor-like kinase 5 inhibits angiogenesis. Although this factor has long been considered profibrogenic in cooperation with other NRP-1 ligands such as PDGF-B, its inhibition causes undesired effects. Expression of both NRP-1 and TGF-β is low in quiescent HSCs in the normal liver and both increase immediately upon liver damage[56]. That suggests a complex scenario for NRP-1 as a coreceptor with angiogenic and profibrogenic receptors. We must not forget the functions of the liver as an immune organ, in which NRP-1 participates. In addition to the liver lymphocyte population, which is selectively enriched with NK and NKT cells, circulating lymphocytes interact closely with LSECs, KCs, and dendritic cells present in liver sinusoids[57]. NRP-1 has been associated with inhibition of immune responses[58], which may also occur in the liver, an organ that is part of the innate immune system.

FEASIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF NRP-1 DURING LIVER PATHOLOGIES AND COVID-19

COVID-19 affects mainly the upper airways. In some cases, involvement of the lower airways, gives rise to pneumonia[59]. Along with the ability to infect other tissues in addition to the airways, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection is detectable in various organs even without local viral invasion[59]. Liver injury occurs in a large proportion of COVID-19 patients and is characterized by elevated levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, and/or aspartate aminotransferase enzymes; and occasionally, moderate hyperbilirubinemia[60-63]. The persistence and degree of liver damage caused by COVID-19 seem to vary. In most cases, liver function recovers soon after viral infection, but patients with severe disease may develop irreversible hepatic injury[64-66]. In line with that observation, increased severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection is related to reduced hepatic function[62,67]. A recent postmortem analysis found microvesicular steatosis along with lobular and portal activity in a CODIV-19 patient[68]. To date, apart from immune-related inflammation and hypoxia generated by airway malfunction, the mechanisms proposed to explain the reported liver damage were drug toxicity, inflammation, and hypoxia resulting from lung malfunction[60,69]. The expression of ACE2 in cholangiocytes has also been proposed as a possible mechanism of liver injury. NRP-1 expression in LSECs and HSCs may thus act to amplify the liver damage as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Neuropilin-1 expression in healthy and injured liver. Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) is expressed at low levels in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in healthy liver sinusoids. However, NRP-1 is upregulated in activated LSECs and HSCs present in several liver pathologies. The increase in NRP-1 during liver disease may facilitate and amplify infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), driving to liver failure and a worse prognosis because of the development of severe COVID-19 disease. SARS-CoV-2 image adapted from NIAID. aHSC: Activated hepatic stellate cell; KC: Kupffer cell; qHSC: Quiescent hepatic stellate cell.

Neuropilin-1 expression in healthy and injured liver. Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) is expressed at low levels in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in healthy liver sinusoids. However, NRP-1 is upregulated in activated LSECs and HSCs present in several liver pathologies. The increase in NRP-1 during liver disease may facilitate and amplify infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), driving to liver failure and a worse prognosis because of the development of severe COVID-19 disease. SARS-CoV-2 image adapted from NIAID. aHSC: Activated hepatic stellate cell; KC: Kupffer cell; qHSC: Quiescent hepatic stellate cell.

LIVER FIBROTIC RESPONSE

Hepatic fibrosis is a scarring response involving various types of cells affected by liver diseases of different etiologies[70], including metabolic diseases, exacerbated immune responses, and viral infections. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has some similarities to infections of the SARS-CoV-2 virus family[71]. In SARS, the defects observed in the liver are more the result of viral infection than other factors, such as drug toxicity or systemic inflammatory responses[71]. However, the cause of the liver disease observed in a high percentage of COVID-19 patients following SARS-CoV-2 infection is not clear, but steatosis and fibrosis are observed in liver biopsies. Wang et al[72] pointed to direct infection of the liver by SARS-CoV-2 as the cause of the steatosis, lobular inflammation, endothelitis, and fibrosis in patients with COVID-19. Even though the ACE2 receptor has been identified as the main mediator of virus entry[73], the probability that SARS-CoV-2 infects the liver by that route is low given its low or null expression in hepatocytes, HSCs, and LSECs[74]. The development of the fibrotic response in COVID-19 patients may then depend on other routes. It is interesting to note that high levels of other molecules involved in the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 such as furin, TMPRSS11a, and NRP-1 were detected in infected cells[75] with and without ACE2 receptors. Apart from its involvement in the entry of SARS-CoV-2, the role of NRP-1 as a signaling platform has been established. Cao et al[38] found that NRP-1 was a signaling element in HSCs during fibrotic processes caused by viral infections. NRP-1 could thus be the link between infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the development of hepatic steatosis with the presence of a fibrotic response. HSCs play a central role during liver fibrosis. Following activation, HSCs undergo a change from a quiescent phenotype to a myofibroblastic phenotype characterized by increased proliferation, motility, and accumulation of extracellular matrix. They also contribute to angiogenesis and vascular remodeling processes[70]. HSC activation is initiated by the binding of PDGF-B to its receptor along with a temporal increase in NRP-1. NRP-1 also promotes signaling via other key growth factors involved the development of liver fibrosis, such as TGF-β and VEGF[38]. The overexpression of NRP-1 in patients with cirrhosis caused by HCV infection contributes to the progression of liver fibrosis either by influencing the angiogenic response or effects on the PDGF and TGF-β signaling pathways. NRP-1 regulates not only the motility of HSCs but also collagen deposition, and the severity of fibrosis associated with steatohepatitis and HCV infection are related to the expression of NRP-1. To date, no studies have linked NRP-1 expression with liver involvement in COVID-19 patients. However, it is tempting to hypothesize that the fibrotic response is related to the expression of NRP-1 as an extracellular coreceptor. In other scenarios, such as acute lung SARS or Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) infection, cell entry is mediated by TGF-β[76], a mechanism possibly relevant to SARS-CoV-2 and its coreceptor, NRP-1. In the acute phase of COVID-19, the levels of TGF-β are directly related to the development of pulmonary fibrosis[77] and liver fibrosis in pathologies derived from different etiologies[78]. Currently, no studies have found a similar relationship of TGF-β to the fibrotic processes observed in the livers in patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the mechanical ventilation required by many COVID-19 patients alters hepatic hemodynamics, with reduced portal flow that can result in acute liver damage and activation of HSCs[79]. Although it has not been possible to relate the presence of metabolic fatty liver diseases with the increased risk of hospitalization, nor to the outcomes of hospitalized patients with both diseases, Campos-Murguía et al[80] observed an increased risk of the need for mechanical ventilation with the development of liver fibrosis, among other symptoms. However, other studies observed an increase in the severity of the disease in the presence of a fibrotic development. Even today, it is not clear whether SARS-CoV-2 is solely responsible for the development of liver damage or if the damage is a consequence of systemic inflammation caused by the virus or its treatment[81]. Regardless of the cause of liver damage, conditions such as hypoxia, inflammation, and fibrotic responses that develop as a result of the viral infection are related to elevated levels of NRP-1 in both HSCs and LSECs. Indeed, in hypoxic states, such as those observed during COVID-19 progression, HSCs respond through an increase in VEGF. As a result, there is a concomitant increase in the expression of NRP-1 in LSECs, HSC motility, and TGF-β-dependent collagen production[47]. In the presence of TGF-β the glycome of activated HSCs favors the binding of galectins to NRP-1, which promotes migration and further activation[19,82]. It is interesting to note that the levels of both galectin-1 and -3 are increased in COVID-19 patients and have been significantly associated with the severity of the disease[83]. In addition to all the above, the activation of HSCs, which drives liver fibrosis, is induced by profibrotic and proinflammatory cytokines. The resulting inflammatory environment during the development and progression of COVID-19 may be one of the causes of the reported liver damage and a cause of HSC activation, with the consequent induction of the fibrotic response. In fact, during the development of liver fibrosis, infiltration of a subgroup of macrophages enriched in genes associated with tissue repair has been observed[84,85]. The genes encode coreceptors of NRP-1 and the inflammatory cytokines that regulate its expression[86]. One of those cytokines is IL-6, which results from activation of the immune system by SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients and is associated with altered levels of liver enzymes[87]. In various viral infections, IL-6 is associated with the development of liver fibrosis[88] and with an increase in the expression of NRP-1[89]. In addition, the level of galectin-3, which binds to NRP-1 and has a structure similar to a part of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein[90], leads to dysregulated expression of proinflammatory cytokines[83,91]. Its expression is increased secondary to diverse types of injury mediated by viral diseases including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and, SARS-CoV-2[92]. The findings suggest a nexus between systemic inflammation and subsequent liver fibrosis in patients with COVID-19 through NRP-1.

LIVER CANCER

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Viral infection of the liver is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide[93]. Changes in signaling pathways during viral infection promote inflammation that contributes to the development and progression of chronic liver disease beginning with hepatic cirrhosis and finally, HCC[94]. Interestingly, HCV elimination improves the overall survival of HCC patients, indicating that viral infections complicate the outcome[95]. Similarly, SARS-CoV-2 viral infection may facilitate HCC or complicate the outcome of the disease. In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, several reports have linked the presence of cancer with an increase of a worse outcome in COVID-19 patients[96,97]. Furthermore, a prospective nationwide cohort study carried out in China revealed that 1% of COVID-19 patients had a history of cancer. Those patients had an increased risk of complications, ICU admission, and a fatal outcome compared with patients without cancer. Interestingly, cancer survivors had more likely to suffer disease complications than healthy people but less likely than cancer patients[98]. Recent studies describe a possible link between SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in cancer tissues and increased risk of infection[99]. In liver cancer, Dai et al[100] found that upregulated expression of ACE2, the primary SARS-CoV-2 ligand in infected cells, was related to improved survival in HCC patients. However, an increase in ACE2 expression might make such patients more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The link between NRP-1 and liver cancer was discovered some years ago, with increased NRP-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma[39]. NRP-1 expression was higher in LSECs from HCC biopsies than from healthy liver biopsies. Hepatocyte expression of NRP-1 correlated with primary HCC and increased with tumor progression. Blocking NRP-1 protein led to impaired tumor growth and vascular remodeling[39]. Interestingly, NRP-1 expression stimulated the activation of HSCs[101], liver-resident myofibroblast-like cells that contribute to the malignant growth of liver metastasis[23,24,102]. The NRP-1-dependent activation boosted tumor proliferation, cell migration, and invasiveness[101]. Therefore, it is tempting to hypothesize that HCC patients with increased NRP-1 expression in LSECs, tumor cells, and HSCs may have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a relatively uncommon liver malignancy, accounting for about 10% of liver cancers[103]. The risk of CCA appears to be increased by both HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection[104], which may also account for increased SARS-CoV-2 risk. Little is known about the involvement of NRP-1 in CCA. There is evidence that NRP-1 expression is elevated in intrahepatic CCA tissue compared with normal biliary tissue. Moreover, the association of NRP-1 and CCA development has been confirmed by NRP-1 knockdown leading to impaired cancer cell proliferation, blocked cell cycle, reduced cell migration, and reduced focal adhesion kinase expression[105]. In line with that finding, NRP-1 overexpression in intrahepatic CCA cells that was associated with miR-320a downregulation boosted cell proliferation and epithelial to mesenchymal transition and stimulated tumor angiogenesis[106]. Recently, high NRP-1 expression was correlated with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival of intrahepatic CCA patients[107]. Intrahepatic CCA may favor development of an inflammatory milieu driving to vascular permeabilization and increased expression of NRP-1 upon activation of liver-resident cells. The inflammation may be mediated by IL-13, which significantly increased in CCA patients and is known to promote the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells[108,109]. Therefore, CCA could indirectly promote NRP-1 expression in both LSECs and HSCs and facilitate liver damage by immune infiltration. Based on the data, SARS-CoV-2 infection may be facilitated by CCA through NRP-1 overexpression. HCV, HBV, or SARS-CoV-2 infection could drive to liver inflammation and LSEC and HSC activation. The process would lead to increased recruitment of inflammatory cells, NRP-1 overexpression, and assisted viral infection accompanied by liver injury.

CYTOKINE STORM MAY INCREASE LIVER DAMAGE AND NRP-1 EXPRESSION

Cytokine storm is a potentially fatal consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The release of inflammatory cytokines into the blood of infected individuals is a major turning point in the prognosis and survival of patients with severe disease[110]. The liver filters and detoxifies the blood supply coming from the portal vein and hepatic artery. During COVID-19, both amplifying viruses and cytokines released during the cytokine storm enter the liver and flow through the liver sinusoids and small diameter capillaries in contact with nonparenchymal liver cells, LSECs, KCs, and HSCs[51]. These small vessels have specific properties adapted for their function, such as fenestrations in the endothelial layer, tightly controlled immune tolerance, close contact with nonparenchymal-cell subsets and hepatocytes, and a wide array of cell adhesion molecules and receptors[111,112]. As mentioned previously, the cytokine storm is induced by the release of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α, interferon-γ, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 1α and 1β, and VEGF[67,113] and complicates the course of the disease, driving to multiorgan failure and coagulation. The role of these inflammatory mediators in the recruitment of immune and nonimmune cells into the infectious foci, mainly the lungs, is widely recognized and well characterized. However, these soluble proteins have the intrinsic ability to switch on a wide spectrum of cellular responses in both immune cells and nonimmune cells in epithelial, endothelial, and other tissues[114]. Some of the soluble mediators released during the cytokine storm may increase liver permeability. The effects of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β increase the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in endothelial cells[115-117], which may take place during SARS-CoV-2 infection. LSEC ICAM-1 mediates the adhesion and infiltration of immune cells in the liver[118], which may further increase the number of inflammatory cells and increase the extent of liver damage. VEGF mediates the recruitment of several immune populations[119] and is considered the main stimulus for the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells[120]. It is also a ligand of NRP-1[53]. Interestingly, VEGF acts on endothelial cells not only as a proliferative and promigratory signal, but it can stimulate the expression of NRP-1[121,122], creating a feedback loop. Consequently, VEGF may facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infection in the liver through the upregulation of the local expression of NRP-1, the recently discovered SARS-CoV-2 receptor. It is tempting to hypothesize that this process may take place in other tissues such as the lung epithelium and that the involvement of IL-6 in promoting increased NRP-1 expression might be underestimated. Previous reports have described NRP-1 upregulation in pancreatic cancer[89,123], which was stimulated by IL-6 and mediated by STAT3 transcription activity[89]. Interestingly, the IL-6/STAT3 pathway plays a significant role during HSC activation[124] and might boost the expression of NRP-1 in these liver-specific cells.

CONCLUSION

The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection is increased in patients with previous pathologies. A high proportion of COVID-19 patients experience liver damage. NRP-1 is a recently discovered coreceptor for SARS-CoV-2 virus, and is overexpressed in the injured and pathologic liver. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and liver diseases should be followed to monitor the liver response and overall health status. The increased expression in NRP-1 in the pathologic liver of patients suffering from COVID-19 may represent an amplifying pathway to further complicate the infection and worsen the prognosis and severity of the disease. There is evidence of a link between liver NRP-1 and SARS-CoV-2 infection, but further study is needed to determine whether previous liver disease and NRP-1 influence COVID-19 progression, severity and mortality. Even though the presence of liver disease can promote the increased severity of COVID-19 disease, direct infection and liver injury by SARS-COV-2 virus cannot be ruled out. Liver diseases, such as fibrosis and different types of liver cancers, share active mediators that are directly linked to NRP-1, indicating a feasible and direct relationship of NRP-1, liver disease with COVID-19.
  122 in total

1.  Structural basis for ligand and heparin binding to neuropilin B domains.

Authors:  Craig W Vander Kooi; Manuel A Jusino; Benjamin Perman; David B Neau; Henry D Bellamy; Daniel J Leahy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interleukin-6 is associated with noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with alcohol problems.

Authors:  Daniel Fuster; Judith I Tsui; Debbie M Cheng; Emily K Quinn; Kaku A Armah; David Nunes; Matthew S Freiberg; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  Interleukin-33 and ST2 Signaling in Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Jaewoo Hong; Soohyun Kim; P Charles Lin
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 4.  Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells - gatekeepers of hepatic immunity.

Authors:  Shishir Shetty; Patricia F Lalor; David H Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  ADAM17 Activity and IL-6 Trans-Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer.

Authors:  Neele Schumacher; Stefan Rose-John
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Inhibition of COX-2 Impairs Colon Cancer Liver Metastasis through Reduced Stromal Cell Reaction.

Authors:  Alba Herrero; Aitor Benedicto; Irene Romayor; Elvira Olaso; Beatriz Arteta
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Lei Shi; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 8.  TGF-β in Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Liver Fibrogenesis-Updated 2019.

Authors:  Bedair Dewidar; Christoph Meyer; Steven Dooley; And Nadja Meindl-Beinker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Three Heads are Better than Two: HBcrAg as a New Predictor of HBV-related HCC.

Authors:  Jer-Wei Wu; Jia-Horng Kao; Tai-Chung Tseng
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Animal models for COVID-19: advances, gaps and perspectives.

Authors:  Changfa Fan; Yong Wu; Xiong Rui; Yuansong Yang; Chen Ling; Susu Liu; Shunan Liu; Youchun Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-07-07

2.  Target and drug predictions for SARS-CoV-2 infection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Luhong Wang; Yinan Ding; Chuanyong Zhang; Rong Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The spike of SARS-CoV-2 promotes metabolic rewiring in hepatocytes.

Authors:  Maria Mercado-Gómez; Endika Prieto-Fernández; Naroa Goikoetxea-Usandizaga; Laura Vila-Vecilla; Mikel Azkargorta; Miren Bravo; Marina Serrano-Maciá; Leire Egia-Mendikute; Rubén Rodríguez-Agudo; Sofia Lachiondo-Ortega; So Young Lee; Alvaro Eguileor Giné; Clàudia Gil-Pitarch; Irene González-Recio; Jorge Simón; Petar Petrov; Ramiro Jover; Luis Alfonso Martínez-Cruz; June Ereño-Orbea; Teresa Cardoso Delgado; Felix Elortza; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero; Ruben Nogueiras; Vincent Prevot; Asis Palazon; María L Martínez-Chantar
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 4.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Management of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Maria Guarino; Valentina Cossiga; Mario Capasso; Chiara Mazzarelli; Filippo Pelizzaro; Rodolfo Sacco; Francesco Paolo Russo; Alessandro Vitale; Franco Trevisani; Giuseppe Cabibbo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  COVID-19 signalome: Pathways for SARS-CoV-2 infection and impact on COVID-19 associated comorbidity.

Authors:  Kenneth Lundstrom; Altijana Hromić-Jahjefendić; Esma Bilajac; Alaa A A Aljabali; Katarina Baralić; Nagwa A Sabri; Eslam M Shehata; Mohamed Raslan; Ana Cláudia B H Ferreira; Ángel Serrano-Aroca; Murtaza M Tambuwala; Vladimir N Uversky; Vasco Azevedo; Khalid J Alzahrani; Khalaf F Alsharif; Ibrahim F Halawani; Fuad M Alzahrani; Debmalya Barh
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.850

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.