Literature DB >> 32395525

A profiling analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different type of cancers vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Yu-Jun Dai1,2,3, Fang Hu1,2,3, Huan Li1,2,3, Han-Ying Huang1,2,3, Da-Wei Wang4, Yang Liang1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) is now causing a severe public health emergency. The novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) infected individuals by binding human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2) receptor. ACE2 is widely expressed in multiple organs including respiratory, cardiovascular, digestive and urinary systems in healthy individuals. These tissues with high expression level of ACE2 seemed to be more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recently, it has been reported that patients with tumors were likely to be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and indicated poor prognosis.
METHODS: The tissue atlas database and the blood atlas were used to analyze the distribution of ACE2 in human tissues or organs of cancers and normal samples. Starbase dataset was applied to predict the prognosis of cancers according to expression level of ACE2.
RESULTS: In this study, we demonstrated a landscape profiling analysis on expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancers and showed the risky of different type of cancers to SARS-CoV-2 according to the expression level of ACE2. In addition, we found that ACE2 was both differential expression and related to the prognosis only in liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). Relative high expression of ACE2 indicated a favorable prognosis in LIHC, but they might be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.
CONCLUSIONS: We indeed emphasized that LIHC patients with high expression level of ACE2 should be more cautious of the virus infection. Our study might provide a potential clue for preventing infection of SARS-CoV-2 in cancers. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2); cancer; liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32395525      PMCID: PMC7210193          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

COVID-19, full name coronavirus disease 2019, is an infectious disease caused by a coronavirus called “SARS-CoV-2” (formerly known as “2019-nCoV”). At the end of 2019, the disease began in Wuhan, Hubei Province (1). So far, 72,530 confirmed cases (including medical staff) have been confirmed in China, including 59,989 in Wuhan, and similar cases have been confirmed in other provinces of China, German, Japan, South Korea, the United States and so on (2-6). In general, the pathogenicity and transmissibility of most coronaviruses are slight (7), but there are two kinds of coronaviruses (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) which have been in global outbreak (8-10). The mortality of SARS-CoV is about 10%, and that of MERS-CoV is nearly 37% (11,12). The related research points out that the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are very similar to SARS-CoV, which can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome and need intensive care (13-17). The median age of the patients was 49 years (IQR, 41.0–58.0 years), and 13 (32%) cases had underlying diseases such as diabetes, hypertension or cardiovascular disease (18,19). This suggests that our susceptible people may be older, which may be closely related to their own immune status. At present, the pathogenic mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 has not been clear, and there is lack of targeted drugs (20,21). SARS-CoV-2 is considered to be similar to SARS-CoV in origin to bats HKU9-1 (15,16,22). It has been reported that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) might have a strong binding ability to the SARS-CoV-2 (23). The cells or tissues expressed ACE2 may be more susceptible to be infected by SARS-CoV-2. In healthy individuals, the organs including lung, heart, kidney, bladder and oesophagus which expressed high level of ACE2 seemed to be more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection (23-25). Whereas, the gene expression in cancer patients is totally different from that in healthy people. Here, we demonstrate a landscape profiling analysis on expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancers and try to explore the risky of different type of cancers to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This might improve the vigilance of specific tumor patients to virus and provide a potential clue for preventing complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

The Tissue Atlas database

The Tissue Atlas database (https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/tissue) included numerous expression profiles of RNA and protein expressed in specific tissues and organs. The results defined the tissues-restricted gene is that its expression must significant elevate more than four-fold higher in special tissues compared to others. Deep sequencing of RNA (RNA-seq) was performed to acquire the mRNA expression data in thirty-seven different types of normal tissues and organs. This protein dataset included 15,313 available protein data. The expressions of proteins were validated in forty-four normal tissues by using immunohistochemistry and all images of immunohistochemistry were also available in this website.

The Blood Atlas analysis

The Blood Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/blood) contains the information of more than 15 types of cells in blood including monocytes, NK-cells and dendritic cells etc. The RNA expression of ACE2 in these blood cells and the ACE2 protein detected in human plasma were analyzed in this database. The ACE2 protein concentration was estimated through mass spectrometry or immune assays.

Starbase dataset

Starbase database constructed the most comprehensive pan cancer expression map and interaction network including 14 cancer types (>6,000 samples). Differential expressed of ACE2 in pan-cancers were analyzed automatically when we enter the gene symbol into the search line. The gene expression of ACE2 in clinical cancer specimens was compared with that in paired normal controls using the Student’s t test. Next, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods were used to analyze the overall survival by Starbase dataset (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/panCancer.php).

Results

Expression profile of ACE2 in healthy human tissues

A human cell receptor ACE2 was reported to have strong binding affinity to SARS-CoV-2 (23). Here, we demonstrated an overview of RNA and protein expression data of ACE2 in healthy human tissues. These tissues were first divided into groups with different color-code according to their functional features. We found that ACE2 RNA is more enriched in endocrine tissues, gastrointestinal tract, liver and gallbladder, kidney and urinary bladder, male tissues and muscle tissues. The tendency of ACE2 protein expression level was similar to its RNA, but exhibited much more expression level in Liver and gallbladder, Kidney and urinary bladder and male tissues (). To further confirm the expression of ACE2 in these tissues, we analyzed the ACE2 RNA expression level in four datasets and listed the top 10 tissues expressed high ACE2 in . The result demonstrated that small intestine was the tissue with the highest expression of ACE2 in four datasets, the colon and kidney were exhibited a relative higher expression compared to other organs. In addition, these results showed that ACE2 was also high expressed in testis tissue, which wasn’t caught our attention before (). At protein level, the result showed that ACE2 was enriched in digestive and urinary system including duodenum, gallbladder, small intestine, colon, rectum and kidney (). Furthermore, we indicated that the male reproductive system (testis) was also high expressed ACE2 protein, which was a little different with some published reports.
Figure 1

Expression of ACE2 in human tissues and organs. (A) The mRNA and protein expression profile of ACE2 in all tissues and organs; (B) the top 10 tissues or organs with ACE2 mRNA expression in four databases (Consensus dataset, Fantom5 dataset, GTEx dataset and HPA dataset); (C) TOP20 tissues or organs with ACE2 protein expression in related database. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

Expression of ACE2 in human tissues and organs. (A) The mRNA and protein expression profile of ACE2 in all tissues and organs; (B) the top 10 tissues or organs with ACE2 mRNA expression in four databases (Consensus dataset, Fantom5 dataset, GTEx dataset and HPA dataset); (C) TOP20 tissues or organs with ACE2 protein expression in related database. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

ACE2 protein concentration in plasma

It has been reported that high concentrations of cytokines were recorded in the plasma of severe patients (19). We analyzed the ACE2 expression in immune cells and we found that it was hardly expressed in all type of immune cells in blood (). Next, we wonder whether these abnormal cytokines were associated with the concentration of ACE2 protein in plasma. The ACE2 protein concentration was quantified by mass spectrometry and estimated from spectral counts in a publicly available data set obtained from the peptide atlas. The data showed that ACE2 protein was detected in plasma with about 85 ng/L (). Due to the infection rate of male is higher than that of female, we further compared the protein expression level in plasma between male and female by using the result of proximity extension assay (PEA). To our surprise, the protein concentration of ACE2 was a little higher in male plasma than that in female in four visits at three month intervals (). This might interpret the different susceptibility between male and female.
Figure S1

Expression of ACE2 in human blood cells. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

Figure 2

ACE2 protein concentration in plasma. (A) The concentration of ACE2 protein estimated in plasma; (B) the difference of ACE2 protein concentration between male and female. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

ACE2 protein concentration in plasma. (A) The concentration of ACE2 protein estimated in plasma; (B) the difference of ACE2 protein concentration between male and female. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

Expression profile and prognosis of ACE2 in pan-cancers

Cancer patients are suffering novel coronavirus pneumonia and risk of poor prognosis after infection due to malignant tumor itself, chemotherapy and surgery (26). We next estimated the expression profile of ACE2 in Pan-cancers. In TCGA dataset, we found that ACE2 RNA was majority highly expressed in renal cancer and colorectal cancer, which was consistent with its expression in normal tissues (). In addition, the protein expression level was a little different from that of RNA. This protein was not only expressed in renal and colorectal cancers but also expressed in liver and testis cancers both in CAB026147 and HP000288 datasets (). Next, we filtered the differentially expression of ACE2 between tumor and normal tissues in pan-cancer by ENCORI. In total, we found that it was significant differentially expressed in six type of cancers including kidney chromophobe (KICH), breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), thyroid carcinoma (THCA), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) with P value <0.05 and FDR <0.05 (). The expression of ACE2 was much lower in 374 patients with liver cancer compared with that in 50 normal samples (P=0.0012, FDR =0.0038). We then examined the efficiency of ACE2 in the survival of pan-cancer patients. The result revealed that decreased ACE2 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in overall survival (OS) of patients with kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC, P=0.00016, HR =0.55), mesothelioma (MESO, P=0.0028, HR =0.48), ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OV, P=0.0073, HR =0.7) and LIHC (P=0.017, HR =0.65) (). To our attention, we found that ACE2 was both differential expression and related to the prognosis only in LIHC ().
Figure 3

Expression Profile and Prognosis of ACE2 in Pan-cancers. (A) The RNA expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancers in TCGA dataset. The protein expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancer in CAB026147 (B) and HPA000288 (C). ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II.

Table 1

ACE2 significant differentially expressed in six type of cancers compared with normal samples

CancerCancer full nameCancer numberNormal numberCancer ExpNormal ExpFold changeP valueFDR
KICHKidney chromophobe65240.19.490.011.10E-271.50E-25
BRCABreast invasive carcinoma1,1041131.090.482.279.10E-228.20E-21
PRADProstate adenocarcinoma499520.191.80.111.60E-133.40E-12
THCAThyroid carcinoma510580.60.720.830.000740.0023
LIHCLiver hepatocellular carcinoma374502.341.072.190.00120.0038
STADStomach adenocarcinoma375324.2435.620.120.00480.013
LUADLung adenocarcinoma526592.790.823.380.0470.097
UCECUterine corpus endometrial carcinoma548350.660.381.750.0390.1
KIRPKidney renal papillary cell carcinoma2893240.8220.931.950.0570.14
COADColon adenocarcinoma4714113.6216.420.830.0730.17
PAADPancreatic adenocarcinoma17844.830.786.180.0460.38
ESCAEsophageal carcinoma162112.620.912.870.210.5
HNSCHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma502441.411.11.170.470.62
CHOLCholangiocarcinoma36910.941.228.970.560.67
BLCABladder urothelial carcinoma411191.281.011.260.480.73
KIRCKidney renal clear cell carcinoma5357222.6617.241.310.720.76
LUSCLung squamous cell carcinoma501491.560.841.850.670.77

ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; Exp, expression level.

Table 2

The efficiency of ACE2 expression in the survival of pan-cancer patients

CancerCancer full nameCancer numberMediancoef.HRP value
KIRCKidney renal clear cell carcinoma51715.45−0.590.550.00016
MESOMesothelioma850.03−0.730.480.0028
OVOvarian serous cystadenocarcinoma3740.15−0.360.70.0073
LIHCLiver hepatocellular carcinoma3690.22−0.430.650.017
LUSCLung squamous cell carcinoma4690.8−0.280.760.054
STADStomach adenocarcinoma3651.28−0.060.940.7
KICHKidney chromophobe640.07−0.160.860.82
LUADLung adenocarcinoma5031.020.031.030.84
BRCABreast invasive carcinoma1,0820.05−0.030.970.85
PRADProstate adenocarcinoma4950.1−0.020.980.97

ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; coef., co-efficiency.

Figure 4

Prognosis of ACE2 in LIHC. (A) The expression level of ACE2 in LIHC compared with normal samples; (B) overall survival for ACE2 in LIHC cancer with P=0.017. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma.

Expression Profile and Prognosis of ACE2 in Pan-cancers. (A) The RNA expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancers in TCGA dataset. The protein expression level of ACE2 in pan-cancer in CAB026147 (B) and HPA000288 (C). ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; Exp, expression level. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; coef., co-efficiency. Prognosis of ACE2 in LIHC. (A) The expression level of ACE2 in LIHC compared with normal samples; (B) overall survival for ACE2 in LIHC cancer with P=0.017. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma.

Discussion

Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak has been reported around the world with characteristic of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (18,27). Recently, it has been reported that tumor patients are likely to have higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and poor prognosis compared with non-tumor individuals (26). Functionally, a receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE2 which is widely distributed in multiple organs was considered as the potential target protein of COVID-19 (24). Consistent with other reports, we found that ACE2 was most highly expressed in digestive system especially in small intestine and colon (28). These results might interpret why SARS-CoV-2 could be isolated from excrement and urine and be transmitted via the fecal-oral route. Majority of patients infected SARS-CoV-2 also had renal dysfunction and this might be related to the high expression of ACE2 protein (23,29). In addition, ACE2 was also detected high expressed in reproductive system. Some paper had pointed out that there was no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 could pass through the placental barrier to transmit from mother to infant (30,31). Therefore, we wondered whether this virus could penetrate the reproductive barrier to affect the function of sperm. ACE2 was reported to play an important role in myocardial infarction (32). In our dataset, we didn’t detect the high expression of ACE2 in heart system. ACE2 is located on the X chromosome, which means that the number of ACE2 in men is half that in women, but the risk of infection in men is not lower than in women. Our data showed that the protein concentration of ACE2 in plasma was a little higher in male than that in female in healthy individuals. This might be the reason how the different susceptibility between men and women. To the limitation of the public data, we couldn’t analyze the relationship between age and COVID-19. Because the cytokine storm was detected in severe infected patients, we hypothesized that this might be closely related to the immune status of patients. In this study, we also showed the risky of different type of cancers to SARS-CoV-2 infection according the expression level of ACE2. In accordance with the result that the incidence of severe events in lung cancer patients was not significantly higher than that in other cancers, our data also demonstrated that ACE2 was not highly expressed in lung cancer cells. Furthermore, we found the unique cancer type LIHC was associated with ACE2 expression and prognosis. Relative high expression of ACE2 indicated a favorable prognosis in LIHC, but they might be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we indeed emphasized that LIHC patients with high expression level of ACE2 should be more aware of the virus infection. Our study might provide a potential clue for preventing infection of SARS-CoV-2 in cancers. Expression of ACE2 in human blood cells. ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme II. The article’s supplementary files as
  32 in total

1.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor.

Authors:  Xing-Yi Ge; Jia-Lu Li; Xing-Lou Yang; Aleksei A Chmura; Guangjian Zhu; Jonathan H Epstein; Jonna K Mazet; Ben Hu; Wei Zhang; Cheng Peng; Yu-Ji Zhang; Chu-Ming Luo; Bing Tan; Ning Wang; Yan Zhu; Gary Crameri; Shu-Yi Zhang; Lin-Fa Wang; Peter Daszak; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Xing-Lou Yang; Xian-Guang Wang; Ben Hu; Lei Zhang; Wei Zhang; Hao-Rui Si; Yan Zhu; Bei Li; Chao-Lin Huang; Hui-Dong Chen; Jing Chen; Yun Luo; Hua Guo; Ren-Di Jiang; Mei-Qin Liu; Ying Chen; Xu-Rui Shen; Xi Wang; Xiao-Shuang Zheng; Kai Zhao; Quan-Jiao Chen; Fei Deng; Lin-Lin Liu; Bing Yan; Fa-Xian Zhan; Yan-Yi Wang; Geng-Fu Xiao; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 4.  Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: risk factors and determinants of primary, household, and nosocomial transmission.

Authors:  David S Hui; Esam I Azhar; Yae-Jean Kim; Ziad A Memish; Myoung-Don Oh; Alimuddin Zumla
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Outbreak in 2019: Computed Tomographic Findings in Two Cases.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Lin; Zhenyu Gong; Zuke Xiao; Jingliang Xiong; Bing Fan; Jiaqi Liu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Holshue; Chas DeBolt; Scott Lindquist; Kathy H Lofy; John Wiesman; Hollianne Bruce; Christopher Spitters; Keith Ericson; Sara Wilkerson; Ahmet Tural; George Diaz; Amanda Cohn; LeAnne Fox; Anita Patel; Susan I Gerber; Lindsay Kim; Suxiang Tong; Xiaoyan Lu; Steve Lindstrom; Mark A Pallansch; William C Weldon; Holly M Biggs; Timothy M Uyeki; Satish K Pillai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury.

Authors:  Clark D Russell; Jonathan E Millar; J Kenneth Baillie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection.

Authors:  Xin Zou; Ke Chen; Jiawei Zou; Peiyi Han; Jie Hao; Zeguang Han
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Fusion mechanism of 2019-nCoV and fusion inhibitors targeting HR1 domain in spike protein.

Authors:  Shuai Xia; Yun Zhu; Meiqin Liu; Qiaoshuai Lan; Wei Xu; Yanling Wu; Tianlei Ying; Shuwen Liu; Zhengli Shi; Shibo Jiang; Lu Lu
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 11.530

View more
  29 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of the novel omicron receptor AXL in cancers.

Authors:  Wei-Na Zhang; Xue-Ping Li; Peng-Fei Wang; Lu Zhu; Xin-Hua Xiao; Yu-Jun Dai
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.155

2.  Comprehensive Profiling Analysis of CD209 in Malignancies Reveals the Therapeutic Implication for Tumor Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jinyuan Li; Shuzhao Chen; Yang Li; Ziang Zhu; Hanying Huang; Weida Wang; Yao Yang; Yang Liang; Lingling Shu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Atrial appendage angiotensin-converting enzyme-2, aging and cardiac surgical patients: a platform for understanding aging-related coronavirus disease-2019 vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Amit K Saha; Xuming Sun; Neal D Kon; Carlos M Ferrario; Leanne Groban
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Are All Patients with Cancer at Heightened Risk for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)?

Authors:  Georgios Chamilos; Michail S Lionakis; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 20.999

5.  The SARS-CoV-2 host cell receptor ACE2 correlates positively with immunotherapy response and is a potential protective factor for cancer progression.

Authors:  Zhilan Zhang; Lin Li; Mengyuan Li; Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 6.  Cancerona: Challenges of Cancer Management in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Farah Ballout; Reem Daouk; Joseph Azar; Michael Timonian; Tarek Araji; Hisham F Bahmad; Wassim Abou-Kheir
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-30

7.  Cancer is associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severity and mortality: A pooled analysis.

Authors:  Isaac Cheruiyot; Vincent Kipkorir; Brian Ngure; Musa Misiani; Jeremiah Munguti
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 8.  Telemedicine and the current opportunities for the management of oncological patients in Peru in the context of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Paola Montenegro; Luis Pinillos; Frank Young; Alfredo Aguilar; Indira Tirado-Hurtado; Joseph A Pinto; Carlos Vallejos
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 9.  Neuropilin-1: A feasible link between liver pathologies and COVID-19.

Authors:  Aitor Benedicto; Iñigo García-Kamiruaga; Beatriz Arteta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Expression of ACE2, Soluble ACE2, Angiotensin I, Angiotensin II and Angiotensin-(1-7) Is Modulated in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Ikram Omar Osman; Cléa Melenotte; Philippe Brouqui; Matthieu Million; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Philippe Parola; Andréas Stein; Bernard La Scola; Line Meddeb; Jean-Louis Mege; Didier Raoult; Christian A Devaux
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.