Literature DB >> 34236707

Predictors of surgical complications in patients with sinonasal malignancy.

Sonam Dodhia1, Conall W R Fitzgerald2, Andrew T McLean2, Avery Yuan2, Cristina Valero Mayor2, Dauren Adilbay2, Ximena Mimica2, Piyush Gupta2, Jennifer R Cracchiolo2, Snehal Patel2, Richard J Wong2, Jatin Shah2, Ian Ganly2, Marc A Cohen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sinonasal and skull base tumors are rare, making it difficult to identify trends in surgical outcome. This study examines complications in a large cohort of patients undergoing surgery for sinonasal malignancy.
METHODS: Following IRB approval, an institutional database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent surgery for sinonasal or skull base malignancies from 1973 to 2016 at our institution. Charlson comorbidity index score and Clavien-Dindo grade were calculated. The main study endpoint was subgroup analysis of Clavien-Dindo Grade 0, Grades 1-2, and Grades 3-5 complications. An ordinal logistic regression model was constructed to assess the association between comorbidities, demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical complications.
RESULTS: In total, 448 patients met inclusion criteria. Perioperative mortality rate at 30 days was 1.6% (n = 7). The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo 3 or higher) was 13.6% (n = 61). Multivariate analysis using an ordinal logistic regression model showed no association between Charlson comorbidity index score and Clavien-Dindo grade of postoperative complication. Advanced T-stage was significantly associated with complications (p = 0.0014; odds ratio: 3.442 [95% confidence interval: 1.615, 7.338]).
CONCLUSION: Surgery for sinonasal and skull base tumors is safe with a low mortality rate. Advanced T-stage is associated with postoperative complications. These findings have implications for preoperative risk stratification. Key Points Surgery for sinonasal malignancy is safe with a 30 mortality of 1.6% and rate of severe complications of 12.8%. There is no association between patient comorbidity and post operative complication. On multivariate analysis, only advanced T stage was associated with increased rate of surgical complication.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; malignancy; sinonasal; skull base

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34236707      PMCID: PMC9405412          DOI: 10.1002/jso.26598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   2.885


  17 in total

1.  Complications in skull base surgery for malignancy.

Authors:  P J Donald
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  A COMBINED INTRACRANIAL FACIAL APPROACH TO THE PARANASAL SINUSES.

Authors:  A S KETCHAM; R H WILKINS; J M VANBUREN; R R SMITH
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base.

Authors:  Valerie J Lund; Heinz Stammberger; Piero Nicolai; Paolo Castelnuovo; Tim Beal; Alfred Beham; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Hannes Braun; Paola Cappabianca; Ricardo Carrau; Luigi Cavallo; George Clarici; Wolfwang Draf; Felice Esposito; Juan Fernandez-Miranda; Wytske Fokkens; Paul Gardner; Verena Gellner; Henrik Hellquist; Phillipe Hermann; Werner Hosemann; David Howard; Nick Jones; Mark Jorissen; Amin Kassam; Daniel Kelly; Senta Kurschel-Lackner; Samuel Leong; Nancy McLaughlin; Roberto Maroldi; Amir Minovi; Michael Mokry; Metin Onerci; Yew Kwang Ong; Daniel Prevedello; Hesham Saleh; Dharambir S Sehti; Daniel Simmen; Carl Snyderman; Auturo Solares; Magaret Spittle; Aldo Stamm; Peter Tomazic; Matteo Trimarchi; Frank Unger; Peter-John Wormald; Adam Zanation
Journal:  Rhinol Suppl       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Endoscopic cranionasal resection of anterior skull base tumor.

Authors:  A P Yuen; C F Fung; K N Hung
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Complications of craniofacial resection for tumors involving the anterior skull base.

Authors:  D H Kraus; J P Shah; E Arbit; J H Galicich; E W Strong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients.

Authors:  Amin B Kassam; Daniel M Prevedello; Ricardo L Carrau; Carl H Snyderman; Ajith Thomas; Paul Gardner; Adam Zanation; Bulent Duz; S Tonya Stefko; Karin Byers; Michael B Horowitz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Complications of Open Approaches to the Skull Base in the Endoscopic Era.

Authors:  Justin D Miller; Robert J Taylor; Emily C Ambrose; Jeffrey P Laux; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-06-02

8.  Immediate and Delayed Complications Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew R Naunheim; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Derrick T Lin; Benjamin S Bleier; Eric H Holbrook; William T Curry; Stacey T Gray
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-05-15

9.  Complications of skull base surgery: an analysis of 30 cases.

Authors:  Tomohiro Sakashita; Nobuhiko Oridate; Akihiro Homma; Yuji Nakamaru; Fumiyuki Suzuki; Hiromitsu Hatakeyama; Shigenari Taki; Yutaka Sawamura; Yuhei Yamamoto; Yasushi Furuta; Satoshi Fukuda
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-03

Review 10.  The P Value and Statistical Significance: Misunderstandings, Explanations, Challenges, and Alternatives.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Andrade
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun
View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy-A single comprehensive cancer center experience.

Authors:  Dauren Adilbay; Cristina Valero; Conall Fitzgerald; Avery Yuan; Ximena Mimica; Piyush Gupta; Richard J Wong; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.