Literature DB >> 28180037

Complications of Open Approaches to the Skull Base in the Endoscopic Era.

Justin D Miller1, Robert J Taylor2, Emily C Ambrose3, Jeffrey P Laux4, Charles S Ebert1, Adam M Zanation1.   

Abstract

Objective It is important to characterize the developing complication profile of the open approach as it becomes reserved for more complex disease during the endoscopic era. Our objective was to characterize complication rates of current open skull base surgery. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary care center. Participants The study group consisted of 103 patients and 117 open skull base surgeries were performed from 2008 to 2012. Main Outcome Measures Intraoperative/postoperative complications. Methods Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test evaluated for associations of complications with potential risk factors. Results Postoperative complications occurred in 53 (45%) cases, of which 36 (31%) were major complications. Malignancy, dural grafting, age, and obesity were not associated with complications. Flap reconstruction was associated with increased complication rates (odds ratio = 2.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-5.04). Conclusion The open approach is increasingly utilized for only the most complex lesions, and selection bias cannot be overstated in comparative series. This study suggests that current open complication rates may be above those cited from prior studies, and patient and physician expectations should be adjusted accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; open approach; skull base

Year:  2016        PMID: 28180037      PMCID: PMC5288120          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  29 in total

1.  Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa.

Authors:  Amin B Kassam; Paul Gardner; Carl Snyderman; Arlan Mintz; Ricardo Carrau
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica.

Authors:  Amin Kassam; Carl H Snyderman; Arlan Mintz; Paul Gardner; Ricardo L Carrau
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Complications of anterior craniofacial resection.

Authors:  F L Dias; G M Sá; J Kligerman; H F Lopes; J R Wance; F P Paiva; A Benévolo; E Q Freitas
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Length of stay after free flap reconstruction of the head and neck.

Authors:  M W Ryan; M Hochman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps.

Authors:  S S Kroll; G R Evans; D Goldberg; B G Wang; G P Reece; M J Miller; G L Robb; B J Baldwin; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases.

Authors:  J C Irish; P J Gullane; F Gentili; J Freeman; J B Boyd; D Brown; J Rutka
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Tumors of the paranasal sinuses: a therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  A S Ketcham; J M Van Buren
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Closure of craniofacial defects after cancer resection.

Authors:  I L Wornom; J P Neifeld; A I Mehrhof; H F Young; V M Chinchilli
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction.

Authors:  Mihir R Patel; Robert J Taylor; Trevor G Hackman; Anand V Germanwala; Deanna Sasaki-Adams; Matthew G Ewend; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Complications and early outcome of anterior craniofacial resection.

Authors:  W J Richtsmeier; R J Briggs; W M Koch; D W Eisele; M C Loury; J C Price; D E Mattox; B S Carson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-09
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Orbitocranial Approaches to the Skull Base.

Authors:  Aurora Vincent; Weitao Wang; Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Sameep Kadakia; David Chan; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  [Complications of anterior skull base surgery].

Authors:  M Wagenmann; K Scheckenbach; B Kraus; I Stenin
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Averting Delayed Complications of Open Anterior Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Barak Ringel; Nir Livneh; Narin N Carmel-Neiderman; Gilad Horowitz; Nevo Margalit; Dan M Fliss; Avraham Abergel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-05

4.  Anatomic Considerations of Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Leila J Mady; Thomas M Kaffenberger; Khalil Baddour; Katie Melder; Neal R Godse; Paul Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Mario G Solari; Mark W Kubik; Eric W Wang; Shaum Sridharan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-22

5.  Audit of Complications in an Otolaryngology Led Skull-Base Surgical Practice.

Authors:  Uma Patnaik; Smriti Panda; Alok Thakar
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-12-26

Review 6.  Perioperative Considerations in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Adnan S Hussaini; Christine M Clark; Timothy R DeKlotz
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2020-03-19

7.  Predictors of surgical complications in patients with sinonasal malignancy.

Authors:  Sonam Dodhia; Conall W R Fitzgerald; Andrew T McLean; Avery Yuan; Cristina Valero Mayor; Dauren Adilbay; Ximena Mimica; Piyush Gupta; Jennifer R Cracchiolo; Snehal Patel; Richard J Wong; Jatin Shah; Ian Ganly; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.885

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.