OBJECT: The development of endoscopic endonasal approaches, albeit in the early stages, represents part of the continuous evolution of skull base surgery. During this early period, it is important to determine the safety of these approaches by analyzing surgical complications to identify and eliminate their causes. METHODS: The authors reviewed all perioperative complications associated with endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries performed between July 1998 and June 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. RESULTS: This study includes the data for the authors' first 800 patients, comprising 399 male (49.9%) and 401 female (50.1%) patients with a mean age of 49.21 years (range 3-96 years). Pituitary adenomas (39.1%) and meningiomas (11.8%) were the 2 most common pathologies. A postoperative CSF leak represented the most common complication, occurring in 15.9% of the patients. All patients with a postoperative CSF leak were successfully treated with a lumbar drain and/or another endoscopic approach, except for 1 patient who required a transcranial repair. The incidence of postoperative CSF leaks decreased significantly with the adoption of vascularized tissue for reconstruction of the skull base (< 6%). Transient neurological deficits occurred in 20 patients (2.5%) and permanent neurological deficits in 14 patients (1.8%). Intracranial infection and systemic complications were encountered and successfully treated in 13 (1.6%) and 17 (2.1%) patients, respectively. Seven patients died during the 30-day perioperative period, 6 of systemic illness and 1 of infection (overall mortality 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery provides a viable median corridor based on anatomical landmarks and is customized according to the specific pathological process. This corridor should be considered as the sole access or may be combined with traditional approaches. With the incremental acquisition of skills and experience, endoscopic endonasal approaches have an acceptable safety profile in select patients presenting with various skull base pathologies.
OBJECT: The development of endoscopic endonasal approaches, albeit in the early stages, represents part of the continuous evolution of skull base surgery. During this early period, it is important to determine the safety of these approaches by analyzing surgical complications to identify and eliminate their causes. METHODS: The authors reviewed all perioperative complications associated with endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries performed between July 1998 and June 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. RESULTS: This study includes the data for the authors' first 800 patients, comprising 399 male (49.9%) and 401 female (50.1%) patients with a mean age of 49.21 years (range 3-96 years). Pituitary adenomas (39.1%) and meningiomas (11.8%) were the 2 most common pathologies. A postoperative CSFleak represented the most common complication, occurring in 15.9% of the patients. All patients with a postoperative CSFleak were successfully treated with a lumbar drain and/or another endoscopic approach, except for 1 patient who required a transcranial repair. The incidence of postoperative CSF leaks decreased significantly with the adoption of vascularized tissue for reconstruction of the skull base (< 6%). Transient neurological deficits occurred in 20 patients (2.5%) and permanent neurological deficits in 14 patients (1.8%). Intracranial infection and systemic complications were encountered and successfully treated in 13 (1.6%) and 17 (2.1%) patients, respectively. Seven patients died during the 30-day perioperative period, 6 of systemic illness and 1 of infection (overall mortality 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery provides a viable median corridor based on anatomical landmarks and is customized according to the specific pathological process. This corridor should be considered as the sole access or may be combined with traditional approaches. With the incremental acquisition of skills and experience, endoscopic endonasal approaches have an acceptable safety profile in select patients presenting with various skull base pathologies.
Authors: Avital Perry; Christopher Salvatore Graffeo; Christopher Marcellino; Bruce E Pollock; Nicholas M Wetjen; Fredric B Meyer Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-01-24
Authors: Lili Laleva; Toma Spiriev; Iacopo Dallan; Alberto Prats-Galino; Giuseppe Catapano; Vladimir Nakov; Matteo de Notaris Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-09-06
Authors: Hermes G Garcia; Marc Otten; Marc Pyfer; Saurabh J Singhal; Alfred Marc Iloreta; Varun R Kshettry; Christopher J Farrell; Gurston Nyquist; Marc Rosen; James J Evans Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-05-09
Authors: Leon T Lai; Michael K Morgan; Kornkiat Snidvongs; David C W Chin; Ray Sacks; Richard J Harvey Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2013-06-20
Authors: Matthew R Naunheim; Neerav Goyal; Matthew M Dedmon; Kyle J Chambers; Ahmad R Sedaghat; Benjamin S Bleier; Eric H Holbrook; William T Curry; Stacey T Gray; Derrick T Lin Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2016-03-18