Literature DB >> 34235439

Improved Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Deep Feature Maximum Intensity Projection MRI in Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI.

Qiyuan Hu1, Heather M Whitney1, Hui Li1, Yu Ji1, Peifang Liu1, Maryellen L Giger1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a deep transfer learning method that incorporates four-dimensional (4D) information in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to classify benign and malignant breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective dataset is composed of 1990 distinct lesions (1494 malignant and 496 benign) from 1979 women (mean age, 47 years ± 10). Lesions were split into a training and validation set of 1455 lesions (acquired in 2015-2016) and an independent test set of 535 lesions (acquired in 2017). Features were extracted from a convolutional neural network (CNN), and lesions were classified as benign or malignant using support vector machines. Volumetric information was collapsed into two dimensions by taking the maximum intensity projection (MIP) at the image level or feature level within the CNN architecture. Performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the figure of merit and were compared using the DeLong test.
RESULTS: The image MIP and feature MIP methods yielded AUCs of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.96), respectively, for the independent test set. The feature MIP method achieved higher performance than the image MIP method (∆AUC 95% CI: 0.003, 0.051; P = .03).
CONCLUSION: Incorporating 4D information in DCE MRI by MIP of features in deep transfer learning demonstrated superior classification performance compared with using MIP images as input in the task of distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.Keywords: Breast, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), MR-Dynamic Contrast Enhanced, Supervised learning, Support vector machines (SVM), Transfer learning, Volume Analysis © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34235439      PMCID: PMC8231792          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  28 in total

1.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.

Authors:  N E Hawass
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prognostic value of DCE-MRI in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comparison with traditional survival indicators.

Authors:  Martin D Pickles; Martin Lowry; David J Manton; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of Breast MRI Tumor Classification Using Human-Engineered Radiomics, Transfer Learning From Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, and Fusion Methods.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Hui Li; Yu Ji; Peifang Liu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 10.961

6.  Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Maryellen L Giger; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Hoo-Chang Shin; Holger R Roth; Mingchen Gao; Le Lu; Ziyue Xu; Isabella Nogues; Jianhua Yao; Daniel Mollura; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  A deep learning methodology for improved breast cancer diagnosis using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Heather M Whitney; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.

Authors:  Wenya Linda Bi; Ahmed Hosny; Matthew B Schabath; Maryellen L Giger; Nicolai J Birkbak; Alireza Mehrtash; Tavis Allison; Omar Arnaout; Christopher Abbosh; Ian F Dunn; Raymond H Mak; Rulla M Tamimi; Clare M Tempany; Charles Swanton; Udo Hoffmann; Lawrence H Schwartz; Robert J Gillies; Raymond Y Huang; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of continuous learning on diagnostic breast MRI AI: evaluation on an independent clinical dataset.

Authors:  Hui Li; Heather M Whitney; Yu Ji; Alexandra Edwards; John Papaioannou; Peifang Liu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Performance metric curve analysis framework to assess impact of the decision variable threshold, disease prevalence, and dataset variability in two-class classification.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 3.  Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.947

4.  Multi-Stage Harmonization for Robust AI across Breast MR Databases.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Hui Li; Yu Ji; Peifang Liu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Learning-based analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted MRI to identify true progression in glioma patients.

Authors:  Pengfei Guo; Mathias Unberath; Hye-Young Heo; Charles G Eberhart; Michael Lim; Jaishri O Blakeley; Shanshan Jiang
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.891

6.  Automated artifact detection in abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast.

Authors:  Lorenz A Kapsner; Sabine Ohlmeyer; Lukas Folle; Frederik B Laun; Armin M Nagel; Andrzej Liebert; Hannes Schreiter; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Evelyn Wenkel; Sebastian Bickelhaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 7.  Deep learning in breast imaging.

Authors:  Arka Bhowmik; Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2022-05-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.