| Literature DB >> 34229602 |
Zhi Wang1,2, Caihong Zhong1, Dawei Li1, Chunlin Yan1, Xiaohong Yao3, Zuozhou Li4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plant phylogeographic studies of species in subtropical China have mainly focused on rare and endangered species, whereas few studies have been conducted on taxa with relatively wide distribution, especially polyploid species. We investigated the cytotype and haplotype distribution pattern of the Actinidia chinensis complex, a widespread geographically woody liana with variable ploidy in subtropical China comprising two varieties, with three chloroplast fragments DNA (ndhF-rpl132, rps16-trnQ and trnE-trnT). Macroevolutionary, microevolutionary and niche modeling tools were also combined to disentangle the origin and the demographic history of the species or cytotypes.Entities:
Keywords: Actinidia chinensis complex; Ecological niche models; Genetic diversity; Phylogeography; Polyploidy; Subtropical China
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34229602 PMCID: PMC8259359 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03099-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Cytotype distribution of the A. chinensis complex. Each location is represented by a filled circle or pie chart, with ploidy levels indicated by color. Map generated in ESRI ArcGIS 10.3
Fig. 3BEAST-derived chronograms and haplotypes network of the A. chinensis complex. a BEAST-derived chronograms of the A. chinensis complex based on cp DNA sequences. Blue bars indicate 95% HPD clade credibility intervals for nodes of particular interest with ages (in Ma). The cytotypes were also labeled for each haplotype. b The network of 31 chloroplast haplotypes. Each circle corresponds to a unique haplotype, with circle size reflecting its frequency. Small black circles indicate missing haplotypes
Fig. 2Geographical distribution of cpDNA haplotypes. For the A. chinensis complex, geographical locations of the 50 populations and distributions of 31 chloroplast haplotypes of the A. chinensis complex examined in this study. The populations of var. chinensis and var. deliciosa are indicated different color. Map generated in ESRI ArcGIS 10.3
Genetic diversity and differentiation analyses for cpDNA variations in var. chinensis and var. deliciosa
| Species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.470 | 0.920 | 0.490 | 0.591** | |
| 0.380 | 0.552 | 0.312 | 0.252 | |
| Pooled | 0.441 | 0.884 | 0.501 | 0.638** |
** Indicates that NST is significantly different from GST (P < 0.01)
Population demography of different groups for the A. chinensis complex
| Group | Parameter(τ) | ( | Tajima’s | Fu’s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group E2x | 5.830 (2.477–10.316) | NC | 0.060 | 0.194 | 0.920 | 2.731 |
| Group E4X | 0.446 (0.177–0.724) | 0.084 (0.033–0.136) | 0.178 | |||
| Group M4 × 6x | 0.729 (0.432–0.861) | 0.137 (0.081–0.162) | 0.215 | -1.408 | ||
| Group M2x | 3.928 (2.027–6.203) | NC | 0.046 | 0.134 | 0.484 | 0.926 |
SSD Sum of squared deviation, HRI Harpending’s raggedness index, Tajima’s D and Fu’s FS are neutral test indices, NC Not calculated
P < 0.05
Fig. 4Ancestral areas, reconstructed with the Bayesian Binary MCMC method
Fig. 5Potential distributions of var. chinensis and var. deliciosa predicted with MaxEnt. shown at 2.5 arc minute resolution and projected from six bioclimatic variables representing the current (a, b), LGM (c, d), and LIG (e, f) climatic conditions, respectively. Warmer colors denote areas with a higher probability of presence
Fig. 6Niche comparison of var. chinensis and var. deliciosa. a Niche-identity tests by comparing the niches of var. chinensis and var. deliciosa. b Principal component analysis (PCA) with environmental variables from 240 occurrence data points