Literature DB >> 34221772

Fluidic Considerations of Measuring Intracranial Pressure Using an Open External Ventricular Drain.

Peter G Beidler1, Alexander Novokhodko1,2, Laura M Prolo3,4, Samuel Browd5,1,6, Barry R Lutz1.   

Abstract

Measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP) during cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage with an external ventricular drain (EVD) typically requires stopping the flow during measurement. However, there may be benefits to simultaneous ICP measurement and CSF drainage. Several studies have evaluated whether accurate ICP measurements can be obtained while the EVD is open. They report differing outcomes when it comes to error, and hypothesize several sources of error. This study presents an investigation into the fluidic sources of error for ICP measurement with concurrent drainage in an EVD. Our experiments and analytical model both show that the error in pressure measurement increases linearly with flow rate and is not clinically significant, regardless of drip chamber height. At physiologically relevant flow rates (40 mL/hr) and ICP set points (13.6 - 31.3 cmH2O or 10 - 23 mmHg), our model predicts an underestimation of 0.767 cmH2O (0.56 mmHg) with no observed data point showing error greater than 1.09 cmH2O (0.8 mmHg) in our experiment. We extrapolate our model to predict a realistic worst-case clinical scenario where we expect to see a mean maximum error of 1.06 cmH2O (0.78 mmHg) arising from fluidic effects within the drainage system for the most resistive catheter. Compared to other sources of error in current ICP monitoring, error in pressure measurement due to drainage flow is small and does not prohibit clinical use. However, other effects such as ventricular collapse or catheter obstruction could affect ICP measurement under continuous drainage and are not investigated in this study.
Copyright © 2021, Beidler et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioengineering; catheter; cerebrospinal fluid; continuous measurement; external ventricular drain; intracranial hypertension; neuro-monitoring; neuro-surgery; neurology and critical care; traumatic brain injury

Year:  2021        PMID: 34221772      PMCID: PMC8239198          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  20 in total

1.  An evaluation and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John Vender; Jennifer Waller; Krishnan Dhandapani; Dennis McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Erroneous intracranial pressure measurements from simultaneous pressure monitoring and ventricular drainage catheters.

Authors:  A A Birch; C A Eynon; D Schley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Computational fluid dynamics of ventricular catheters used for the treatment of hydrocephalus: a 3D analysis.

Authors:  Marcelo Galarza; Ángel Giménez; José Valero; Olga Porcar Pellicer; José María Amigó
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury. The Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial.

Authors:  N Juul; G F Morris; S B Marshall; L F Marshall
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Erroneous measurement of intracranial pressure caused by simultaneous ventricular drainage: a hydrodynamic model study.

Authors:  H A Wilkinson; J Yarzebski; E C Wilkinson; F A Anderson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Physical properties of cerebrospinal fluid of relevance to shunt function. 1: The effect of protein upon CSF viscosity.

Authors:  H L Brydon; R Hayward; W Harkness; R Bayston
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  The production of cerebrospinal fluid in man and its modification by acetazolamide.

Authors:  R C Rubin; E S Henderson; A K Ommaya; M D Walker; D P Rall
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease.

Authors:  Conrad E Johanson; John A Duncan; Petra M Klinge; Thomas Brinker; Edward G Stopa; Gerald D Silverberg
Journal:  Cerebrospinal Fluid Res       Date:  2008-05-14

Review 9.  Accuracy of intracranial pressure monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zacchetti; Sandra Magnoni; Federica Di Corte; Elisa R Zanier; Nino Stocchetti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Early Experience of Automated Intraventricular Type Intracranial Pressure Monitoring (LiquoGuard®) for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Young Sub Kwon; Yun Ho Lee; Jin Mo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-04-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive Values for Time from Transducer Stopcock Closure to Accurate Intracranial Pressure Reading.

Authors:  Corrie Earthman; Kathrina Siaron; Jennifer Wilson; DaiWai M Olson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.