Literature DB >> 35999410

Predictive Values for Time from Transducer Stopcock Closure to Accurate Intracranial Pressure Reading.

Corrie Earthman1, Kathrina Siaron2, Jennifer Wilson1, DaiWai M Olson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When using an external ventricular drain (EVD) to monitor intracranial pressure (ICP), nurses need to know how long to wait after each manipulation of the transducer before the displayed ICP value represents an accurate signal. This study explores ICP signal equilibration time (EqT) under clinical conditions.
METHODS: This was a prospective ex vivo study using a simulated skull, standard EVD tubing, and a strain gauge transducer. All 270 trials simulating 90 combinations of different pressures and common clinical conditions were completed in August 2021. Each trial was recorded on video. Videos were scored using video editing software to obtain the exact start and stop time for each trial.
RESULTS: The mean EqT was 44.90 (18.77) seconds. One hundred fifty (55.56%) observations did not reach their expected value within 60 s. The longest mean EqTs were noted when blood was present in the EVD tubing (57.67 [8.91] seconds), when air bubbles were in the tubing (57.41 [8.73] seconds), and when EVD tubing was not flat (level) (50.77 [15.43] seconds). An omnibus test comparing mean EqT for conditions with no variables manipulated (30.08 [16.07] seconds) against mean EqT for all others (47.18 [18.13] seconds) found that mean EqTs were significantly different (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Even when no additional variables were introduced, the mean EqTs were ~ 30 s. Common clinical variables increase the length of time before a transducer connected to an EVD will provide an accurate reading. Nurses should wait at least 30 s after turning the EVD stopcock before assuming ICP value reflects accurate ICP.
© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External ventricular drain; Intracranial pressure; Measurement; Monitoring; Neurocritical care; Nursing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35999410     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-022-01581-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.532


  28 in total

Review 1.  Disorders of CSF hydrodynamics.

Authors:  I Johnston; C Teo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Measuring and monitoring ICP in Neurocritical Care: results from a national practice survey.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Hunt H Batjer; Kamal Abdulkadir; Christiana E Hall
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  The history of external ventricular drainage.

Authors:  Visish M Srinivasan; Brent R O'Neill; Diana Jho; Donald M Whiting; Michael Y Oh
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Distortion of the Intracranial Pressure Waveform by Extraventricular Drainage System.

Authors:  Daniel Teichmann; James C Lynch; Thomas Heldt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Invasive and noninvasive means of measuring intracranial pressure: a review.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Joshua E Medow; Bermans J Iskandar; Fa Wang; Mehdi Shokoueinejad; Joyce Koueik; John G Webster
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Significant practice pattern variations associated with intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  DaiWai M Olson; Lisa S Lewis; Mary Kay Bader; Cynthia Bautista; Rachel Malloy; Kristina E Riemen; Molly M McNett
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.230

Review 7.  Cerebrospinal fluid circulation and hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Ville Leinonen; Ritva Vanninen; Tuomas Rauramaa
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2017

8.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring via External Ventricular Drain: Are We Waiting Long Enough Before Recording the Real Value?

Authors:  Xiuyun Liu; Margaret Griffith; Hannah J Jang; Nerissa Ko; Michele M Pelter; Jacob Abba; Maximilian Vuong; Nate Tran; Kelly Bushman; Xiao Hu
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.230

Review 9.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and intracranial pressure elevation in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Steven William Bothwell; Damir Janigro; Adjanie Patabendige
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2019-04-10

10.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.