Literature DB >> 34221648

Deep learning automated pathology in ex vivo microscopy.

Marc Combalia1, Sergio Garcia1, Josep Malvehy1, Susana Puig1, Alba Guembe Mülberger2, James Browning2, Sandra Garcet2, James G Krueger2, Samantha R Lish2, Rivka Lax2, Jeannie Ren2, Mary Stevenson3, Nicole Doudican3, John A Carucci3, Manu Jain4, Kevin White5, Jaroslav Rakos6, Daniel S Gareau2,6.   

Abstract

Standard histopathology is currently the gold standard for assessment of margin status in Mohs surgical removal of skin cancer. Ex vivo confocal microscopy (XVM) is potentially faster, less costly and inherently 3D/digital compared to standard histopathology. Despite these advantages, XVM use is not widespread due, in part, to the need for pathologists to retrain to interpret XVM images. We developed artificial intelligence (AI)-driven XVM pathology by implementing algorithms that render intuitive XVM pathology images identical to standard histopathology and produce automated tumor positivity maps. XVM images have fluorescence labeling of cellular and nuclear biology on the background of endogenous (unstained) reflectance contrast as a grounding counter-contrast. XVM images of 26 surgical excision specimens discarded after Mohs micrographic surgery were used to develop an XVM data pipeline with 4 stages: flattening, colorizing, enhancement and automated diagnosis. The first two stages were novel, deterministic image processing algorithms, and the second two were AI algorithms. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated for basal cell carcinoma detection as proof of principal for the XVM image processing pipeline. The resulting diagnostic readouts mimicked the appearance of histopathology and found tumor positivity that required first collapsing the confocal stack to a 2D image optimized for cellular fluorescence contrast, then a dark field-to-bright field colorizing transformation, then either an AI image transformation for visual inspection or an AI diagnostic binary image segmentation of tumor obtaining a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 91% respectively. These results show that video-assisted micrographic XVM pathology could feasibly aid margin status determination in micrographic surgery of skin cancer.
© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34221648      PMCID: PMC8221965          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.422168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.562


  35 in total

1.  How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative.

Authors:  Brian J Daley; William Cecil; P Chris Clarke; Joseph B Cofer; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Preparation of frozen sections.

Authors:  Daniel A Davis; Donna M Pellowski; C William Hanke
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy for fast evaluation of tumour margins during Mohs surgery.

Authors:  A Bennàssar; A Vilata; S Puig; J Malvehy
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Flash freezing of Mohs micrographic surgery tissue can minimize freeze artifact and speed slide preparation.

Authors:  Quenby L Erickson; Trishina Clark; Kassandra Larson; T Minsue Chen
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.398

5.  Use of Digitally Stained Multimodal Confocal Mosaic Images to Screen for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer.

Authors:  Euphemia W Mu; Jesse M Lewin; Mary L Stevenson; Shane A Meehan; John A Carucci; Daniel S Gareau
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  Use of a novel 1-hour protocol for rapid frozen section immunocytochemistry, in a case of squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  K Sinha; F Ali; G Orchard; W Rickaby; M Shams; R Mallipeddi; R Patalay
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.470

7.  Line scanning, stage scanning confocal microscope (LSSSCM).

Authors:  Daniel S Gareau; James G Krueger; Jason E Hawkes; Samantha R Lish; Michael P Dietz; Alba Guembe Mülberger; Euphemia W Mu; Mary L Stevenson; Jesse M Lewin; Shane A Meehan; John A Carucci
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Frozen-Section Tissue Processing in Mohs Surgery.

Authors:  Arif Aslam; Sumaira Z Aasi
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.398

9.  Adverse events associated with mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers.

Authors:  Murad Alam; Omer Ibrahim; Michael Nodzenski; John M Strasswimmer; Shang I Brian Jiang; Joel L Cohen; Brian J Albano; Priya Batra; Ramona Behshad; Anthony V Benedetto; C Stanley Chan; Suneel Chilukuri; Courtney Crocker; Hillary W Crystal; Anir Dhir; Victoria A Faulconer; Leonard H Goldberg; Chandra Goodman; Steven S Greenbaum; Elizabeth K Hale; C William Hanke; George J Hruza; Laurie Jacobson; Jason Jones; Arash Kimyai-Asadi; David Kouba; James Lahti; Kristi Macias; Stanley J Miller; Edward Monk; Tri H Nguyen; Gagik Oganesyan; Michelle Pennie; Katherine Pontius; William Posten; Jennifer L Reichel; Thomas E Rohrer; James A Rooney; Hien T Tran; Emily Poon; Diana Bolotin; Meghan Dubina; Natalie Pace; Natalie Kim; Wareeporn Disphanurat; Ummul Kathawalla; Rohit Kakar; Dennis P West; Emir Veledar; Simon Yoo
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 10.  Ex Vivo Microscopy: A Promising Next-Generation Digital Microscopy Tool for Surgical Pathology Practice.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Jonathan Quincy Brown; Nicusor Iftimia; Richard M Levenson; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 5.534

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deep learning on reflectance confocal microscopy improves Raman spectral diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mengkun Chen; Xu Feng; Matthew C Fox; Jason S Reichenberg; Fabiana C P S Lopes; Katherine R Sebastian; Mia K Markey; James W Tunnell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.758

2.  Deep learning with transfer learning in pathology. Case study: classification of basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Raluca Maria Bungărdean; Mircea Sebastian Şerbănescu; Costin Teodor Streba; Maria Crişan
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.