Literature DB >> 25728140

How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative.

Brian J Daley1, William Cecil2, P Chris Clarke2, Joseph B Cofer3, Oscar D Guillamondegui4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative analyzes NSQIP data from 21 participating hospitals. The Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative has reduced surgical complications, but causative factors are unclear. We sought to correlate surgical duration with complications to reveal mitigating strategies. STUDY
DESIGN: Risk-adjusted Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative data on 104,632 general and vascular cases had a standard duration for 35 procedures (eg, breast, colectomy) calculated and NSQIP outcomes complication rates recorded. We derived a marginal time risk for each extra hour of operative time and reported per 1,000 cases.
RESULTS: Procedures taking <95% upper confidence standard time limit (n = 99,741) were deemed "not long" and had significantly fewer urinary tract infections, organ-space surgical site infection, sepsis/septic shock, prolonged intubation, and pneumonia. "Long" cases had increased rates of these complications and also deep venous thrombosis, deep incisional infection, and wound disruption. Per 1,000 cases, there were 116 occurrences per operating room hour. Surgical site infections occurred in 14.4/1,000 cases per hour; risk started at 42 minutes of operative time. Death, pneumonia, and prolonged intubation saw their risks begin before the operation. The highest marginal time risk was for sepsis, occurring 16.6 times per additional hour of operative time over standard. Studying only the 25,146 clean procedures, a significant correlation (p < 0.001) to operation duration persisted, despite an occurrence incidence of 4.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Duration of operation correlates with complications and time longer than a statewide established standard carries higher risk. To reduce risk of complications, these data support expeditious surgical technique and preoperative pulmonary training, and offer accurate outcomes assessment for patient counseling based on case duration. These data can be used directly to counsel individual surgeons to improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  59 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Umashankkar Kannan; Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Amar N Mukerji; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Acquisition models in intraoperative positron surface imaging.

Authors:  Frédéric Monge; Dzhoshkun I Shakir; Florence Lejeune; Xavier Morandi; Nassir Navab; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Cost Analysis of Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Single Academic Center: How Expensive Is Expensive?

Authors:  Keith King; Alvaro Galvez; Jill Stoltzfus; Leonardo Claros; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Does "Two is Better Than One" Apply to Surgeons? Comparing Single-Surgeon Versus Co-surgeon Bilateral Mastectomies.

Authors:  Melissa Anne Mallory; Katya Losk; Kristen Camuso; Stephanie Caterson; Suniti Nimbkar; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Clinical impact of intraoperative electronic health record downtime on surgical patients.

Authors:  Andrew M Harrison; Rizwan Siwani; Brian W Pickering; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Niccolò Napoli; Francesca Costa; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Francesca Menonna; Sara Iacopi; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Barbara Bennie; Mallory S Bray; Choua A Vang; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

9.  Utility and relevance of modified lateral trapezius myocutaneous flap as a locoregional reconstructive option for medium-sized ablative defects in head and neck cancer-our experience.

Authors:  Abhishek Singh; Mudit Agarwal; Naveen Singh; Harit Chaturvedi; Manikandan Venkatasubramaniyan; Anshu Chopra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Lung surgery in elderly patients: are we doing enough?

Authors:  Marco Scarci; Roberto Crisci; Fabrizio Minervini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.