| Literature DB >> 34209820 |
Rosanna Squitti1, Mariacarla Ventriglia2, Ilaria Simonelli2, Cristian Bonvicini1, Alfredo Costa3,4, Giulia Perini3,4, Giuliano Binetti5, Luisa Benussi1, Roberta Ghidoni1, Giacomo Koch6,7, Barbara Borroni8, Alberto Albanese9, Stefano L Sensi10,11,12, Mauro Rongioletti13.
Abstract
Evidence indicates that patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD) show signs of copper (Cu) dyshomeostasis. This study aimed at evaluating the potential of Cu dysregulation as an AD susceptibility factor. We performed a meta-analysis of 56 studies investigating Cu biomarkers in brain specimens (pooled total of 182 AD and 166 healthy controls, HC) and in serum/plasma (pooled total of 2929 AD and 3547 HC). We also completed a replication study of serum Cu biomarkers in 97 AD patients and 70 HC screened for rs732774 and rs1061472 ATP7B, the gene encoding for the Cu transporter ATPase7B. Our meta-analysis showed decreased Cu in AD brain specimens, increased Cu and nonbound ceruloplasmin (Non-Cp) Cu in serum/plasma samples, and unchanged ceruloplasmin. Serum/plasma Cu excess was associated with a three to fourfold increase in the risk of having AD. Our replication study confirmed meta-analysis results and showed that carriers of the ATP7B AG haplotype were significantly more frequent in the AD group. Overall, our study shows that AD patients fail to maintain a Cu metabolic balance and reveals the presence of a percentage of AD patients carrying ATP7B AG haplotype and presenting Non-Cp Cu excess, which suggest that a subset of AD subjects is prone to Cu imbalance. This AD subtype can be the target of precision medicine-based strategies tackling Cu dysregulation.Entities:
Keywords: ATP7B; Alzheimer’s dementia; Alzheimer’s disease; Cu; Wilson’s disease; brain; ceruloplasmin; meta-analysis; serum
Year: 2021 PMID: 34209820 PMCID: PMC8301962 DOI: 10.3390/biom11070960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Flow diagram employed from the screening and selection of the analyzed Cu studies Table 1.
Studies included in the meta-analysis of brain Cu in Alzheimer’s dementia.
| Study (Authors, Year) | Country | Brain Region | Meta-Analysis | Alzheimer’s Dementia | Healthy Controls | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Sex (F) | Mean Age (SD) | Cu μg/g (SD) | N | Sex (F) | Mean Age (SD) | Cu μg/g (SD) | ||||
| Plantin et al., 1987 [ | Sweden | temporal lobe | hippocampus | 5 | 1.8 (0.7) | 6 | 3.1 (0.6) | ||||
| Corrigan et al., 1993 [ | UK | hippocampal tissue | hippocampus | 12 | 10 | 79.5 (9.2) | 4.5 (2.2) | 12 | 4 | 78.5 (9.0) | 5.1 (1.1) |
| Loeffler et al., 1996 [ | USA | frontal cortex | frontal cortex | 12 | 79.4 (1.7) | 7.8 (0.6) | 7 | 75.7 (2.8) | 6.8 (1.0) | ||
| Amygdala | Amygdala | 10 | 3 | 80.4 | 2.7 (0.9) | 11 | 8 | 81.7 | 4.1 (1.0) | ||
| Hippocampus | hippocampus | 2.3 (0.6) | 3.2 (0.7) | ||||||||
| Deibel et al., 1996 [ | USA | superior and middle temporal | cerebral cortex | 3.2 (0.6) | 4.0 (0.6) | ||||||
| inferior parietal | cerebral cortex | 3.8 (0.9) | 4.1 (0.6) | ||||||||
| Cerebellum | Cerebellum | 5.1 (0.1) | 5.7 (1.0) | ||||||||
| Squitti et al., 2007 [ | Italian | cortical tissue | cerebral cortex | 9 | 84.6 | 5.1 (1.6) | 10 | 80.2 (6.8) | 6.8 (1.5) | ||
| Religa et al., 2006 [ | Australia | neocortical tissue | cerebral cortex | 10 | 7 | 81.6 (11) | 2.3 (1.0) | 14 | 12 | 82.8 (11.2) | 2.8 (0.9) |
| Magaki et al., 2007 [ | USA | frontal cortex | frontal cortex | 8 | 6 | 78 (12) | 3.9 (0.3) | 6 | 2 | 72 (11.0) | 6.9 (1.2) |
| Akatsu et al., 2012 [ | Japan | Hippocampus | hippocampus | 15 | 9 | 87.5 (7.6) | 3.78 (8.9) | 12 | 6 | 84 (6.7) | 7.4 (2.1) |
| Amygdala | Amygdala | 18 | 11 | 4.3 (9.1) | 16 | 10 | 85.9 (7.3) | 8.3 (3.9) | |||
| Graham et al., 2014 [ | UK | Brodman area 7 | cerebral cortex | 42 | 21 | 83 (7.2) | 19.3 (2.9) | 26 | 13 | 81.7 (6.2) | 22.5 (4.3) |
| Szabo et al., 2016 [ | USA | frontal cortex | frontal cortex | 14 | 78 | 2.1 (0.7) | 15 | 88 | 2.4 (0.7) | ||
| Xu et al., 2017 [ | New Zealand | Hippocampus | hippocampus | 9 | 4 | 72 (60–80) | 2.18 (1.26) | 13 | 5 | 73 (61–78) | 4.06 (1.59) |
| Scholefield et al., 2020 [ | UK | Cingulate gyrus | frontal cortex | 9 | 6 | 83 (61–89) | 2.72 (0.95) | 9 | 3 | 89 (82–95) | 3.58 (2.19) |
| Scholefield et al., 2020 [ | New Zealand | Cingulate gyrus | frontal cortex | 9 | 4 | 72 (60–80) | 2.98 (1.33) | 9 | 2 | 73 (61–78) | 4.64 (2.11) |
Figure 2Standardized mean difference (SMD) computed from the studies on Cu brain levels (μg/g) in AD patients and HC subjects. SMDs between patients and controls are represented by squares, whose sizes are proportional to the sample size of the relative study. The whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the pooled estimate based on the random-effects model, with the center representing the point estimate and the width indicating the associated 95% CI.
Figure 3Standardized mean difference (SMD) computed from the studies on Cu serum/plasma levels (μmol/L) in AD patients and HC subjects. SMDs between patients and controls are represented by squares, whose sizes are proportional to the sample size of the relative study. The whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the pooled estimate based on the random-effects model, with the center representing the point estimate and the width indicating the associated 95% CI. In panel (A) is the study-wise analysis; in panel (B) is the group-wise analysis. Abbreviations: PY, publication year; N, number; SD, standard deviation; HC, healthy controls.
Figure 4Standardized mean difference (SMD) computed from the studies on Non-Cp Cu(µmol/L) in AD patients and HC subjects. SMDs between AD subjects and controls are represented by squares, whose sizes are proportional to the sample size of the relative study. The whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the pooled estimate based on the random-effects model, with the center representing the point estimate and the width indicating the associated 95% CI. Abbreviations: PY, publication year; N, number; SD, standard deviation; HC, healthy controls.
Figure 5Standardized mean difference (SMD) computed from the studies on Non-Cp Cu(µmol/L) in AD patients and HC subjects when considering studies with a Cu:Cp ratio lower than 6 and higher than 8. SMDs between AD subjects and controls are represented by squares, whose sizes are proportional to the sample size of the relative study. The whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents the pooled estimate based on the random-effects model, with the center representing the point estimate and the width indicating the associated 95% CI. Abbreviations: PY, publication year; N, number; SD, standard deviation; HC, healthy controls.
Demographics and biological variables of participants to the replication study investigating variations of Cu markers in the serum of AD subjects and healthy controls.
| Alzheimer’s Dementia | Healthy Controls | Statistics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic variables | ||||||
| Sex, M | % (n/subjects) | 37.1% (36/97) | 22.9% (16/70) | 0.05 | ||
| Age | mean (SD) | 71.1 (7.18) | 65.9 (7.53) | 0.01 | ||
| MMSE | median (Q1-Q3) | 19 (15–23) | 29 (27.3–30) | <0.001 * | ||
| Biological variables | ||||||
| Cu (µmol/L) | mean (SD) | 15.8 (3.76) | 14.6 (2.95) | F(1, 163) = 6.69 # | 0.011 | |
| Ceruloplasmin (mg/dL) | mean (SD) | 29.3 (4.89) | 29.2 (4.08) | F(1, 163) = 1.13 # | 0.289 | |
| Non-ceruloplasmin Cu *,&,† (µmol/L) | median(Q1-Q3) | 1.4 (0.6–2.8) | 0.75 (−0.16–1.71) | F(1, 163) = 9.88 # | 0.002 | |
| Ceruloplasmin activity (IU) | mean (SD) | 117.9 (26.13) | 110.4 (18.06) | F(1, 163) = 10.21 # | 0.008 | |
| eCp:iCp ratio | mean (SD) | 4.0 (0.51) | 3.8 (0.44) | F(1, 163) = 7.02 # | 0.009 | |
| Cu:Cp ratio | mean (SD) | 7.1 (0.74) | 6.6 (0.93) | F(1, 163) = 10.21 # | 0.002 | |
All analyses were adjusted for sex and age; * non-parametric Mann–Whitney test; & logarithmic transformation was applied as described in method section; † mean (SD) value of Non-Cp Cu in AD patients was 2 (2.29) µmol/L and that in HC was 0.9 (1.59) µmol/L [F(1, 163) = 11.23, p = 0.001].
Genetic characteristics of the investigated AD patients and HC subjects.
| Healthy Controls | AD | Chi-Square | Odd Ratio | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs732774 |
| Freq |
| Freq | Value | df |
| pcorrect | Value | 95% CI | |
|
| |||||||||||
| A | 78 | 0.57 | 113 | 0.62 | |||||||
| G | 60 | 0.43 | 69 | 0.38 | 1.011 | 1 | 0.315 | 0.409 | |||
| Total | 138 | 1.00 | 182 | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| AA | 24 | 0.35 | 29 | 0.32 | |||||||
| AG | 30 | 0.43 | 55 | 0.60 | 7.857 | 2 | 0.020 | 0.032 | |||
| GG | 15 | 0.22 | 7 | 0.08 | |||||||
| Total | 69 | 1.00 | 91 | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Allele A | 54 | 0.78 | 84 | 0.92 | 6.529 | 1 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 3.33 | 1.28 | 8.70 |
| Allele G | 45 | 0.65 | 62 | 0.68 | 0.151 | 1 | 0.698 | 0.799 | 1.14 | 0.59 | 2.21 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||||||
| A | 64 | 0.46 | 72 | 0.40 | |||||||
| G | 74 | 0.54 | 110 | 0.60 | 1.492 | 1 | 0.222 | 0.315 | |||
| Total | 138 | 1.00 | 182 | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| AA | 17 | 0.25 | 10 | 0.11 | |||||||
| AG | 30 | 0.43 | 52 | 0.57 | 5.762 | 2 | 0.056 | 0.097 | |||
| GG | 22 | 0.32 | 29 | 0.32 | |||||||
| Total | 69 | 1.00 | 92 | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| Allele A | 47 | 0.68 | 62 | 0.68 | 4.6 × 10−6 | 1 | 0.998 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 1.96 |
| Allele G | 52 | 0.75 | 81 | 0.89 | 5.212 | 1 | 0.022 | 0.031 | 2.65 | 1.13 | 6.21 |
n subjects in the analysis = 160; AD = 91, healthy controls = 69.
Results of a uni- and a multivariable binary logistic model developed to evaluate the effect of molecular variables on the probability of having AD.
| Univariable Analysis | Multivariable Analysis * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
|
| 1.99 | 0.99–3.98 |
| 2.51 | 1.13–5.56 | 0.023 |
|
| 1.06 | 1.01–1.1 |
| 1.03 | 0.98–1.08 | 0.193 |
|
| 1.11 | 1.01–1.22 |
| |||
|
| 1.01 | 0.94–1.08 | 0.845 | |||
|
| 1.02 | 1.0–1.032 |
| |||
|
| 1.4 | 1.14–1.70 |
| 1.32 | 1.06–1.64 | 0.012 |
|
| 2.86 | 1.36–6.0 |
| 2.17 | 0.96–4.91 | 0.062 |
|
| 1.17 | 0.46–3.01 | 0.74 | |||
|
| ||||||
| AG vs. GA/GA | 2.7 | 1.13–6.23 | 0.026 | 2.49 | 0.99–6.28 | 0.053 |
Table notes: Biochemical variables with a p-value < 0.10 at the univariable analysis (bold values in the table) were included in the multivariable analysis. Cu and eCp were not included to avoid the multicollinearity with Non-Cp Cu and eCp:iCp ratio, respectively. * The analysis was carried out on 160 individuals. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidential Interval.