Literature DB >> 34209421

Electrical Signal Modeling in Cochlear Implants. Study of Temperature and Humidity Effects.

Maria-Alexandra Paun1, Vladimir-Alexandru Paun2, Viorel-Puiu Paun3,4.   

Abstract

The present paper discusses the climatic effects of humidity and temperature on cochlear implant functioning and the quality of the electrical sound signal. MATLAB Simulink simulations were prepared, offering insights into signal behavior under such climatic parameter changes. A simulation setup of the cochlear implant was developed, where a source type selection was used to change between a voice recording and a "chirp" sound. In addition, a DC blocking filter was applied to the input signal. A simulation code, with the application of the climatic influence via the air attenuation function, was developed. Thereby, the attenuation of temperature and humidity in the sound atmospheric circulation of the input signal, at T = 0 °C and RH = 0% and at T = 36 °C and RH = 40% was graphically represented. The results of the electrical pulse generator for each of the eight channels, with the IIR filter, Gaussian noise, temperature variation, humidity influence, and control of denoise block activity, were thus obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MATLAB; Simulink; cochlear implant; humidity; temperature

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209421     DOI: 10.3390/mi12070785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-666X            Impact factor:   2.891


  21 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets.

Authors:  Carolyn Garnham; Martin O'Driscoll; Richard Ramsden And; Shakeel Saeed
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Tony Spahr; Rene Gifford; Louise Loiselle; Sharon McKarns; Timothy Holden; Margaret Skinner; Charles Finley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-10

4.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cochlear implant and inflammation reaction: Safety study of a new steroid-eluting electrode.

Authors:  L Astolfi; E Simoni; N Giarbini; P Giordano; M Pannella; S Hatzopoulos; A Martini
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Frequency Importance Functions in Quiet and Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Douglas P Sladen; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

8.  Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; Sara I Duran; Zachary M Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Lifetime cost of unilateral cochlear implants in adults: a Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Christin Thum; Thomas Lenarz; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Steffen Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.