Literature DB >> 29289062

Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility.

Naomi B H Croghan1, Sara I Duran1, Zachary M Smith1.   

Abstract

This study reconsiders the number of effective channels in contemporary cochlear implants. Subjects listened to matrix sentences with a competing talker using their clinical map (up to 22 electrodes) and reduced-channel maps using 12, 8, and 4 electrodes. Spectro-temporal modulation thresholds and reading span were measured to explore intersubject variability. Results show that speech understanding significantly improved with increasing active electrodes up to 22, particularly for subjects with better spectro-temporal resolution. These findings suggest some listeners may be able to utilize the full electrode array and may not be limited to eight channels of information as indicated in previous studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29289062     DOI: 10.1121/1.5016044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels in perimodiolar electrode recipients.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Emily Shroads; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.

Authors:  Isabel A Martin; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Ting Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dichotic listening performance and effort as a function of spectral resolution and interaural symmetry.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Jourdan T Holder; Katelyn A Berg; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble; Elizabeth Perkins; Stephen Camarata
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-09

8.  High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Christin Ray; Kara J Vasil; David B Pisoni; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Dichotic listening performance with cochlear-implant simulations of ear asymmetry is consistent with difficulty ignoring clearer speech.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Daniel Eisenberg; Kristina DeRoy Milvae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.