Literature DB >> 12476091

Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets.

Carolyn Garnham1, Martin O'Driscoll, Richard Ramsden And, Shakeel Saeed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the investigation described in this paper was the determination of the number of (widely spaced) active electrodes needed for users of a COMBI 40+ cochlear implant to achieve asymptotic performance in the recognition of speech against a background of wideband noise.
DESIGN: This study measured the performance in speech tests of patients using the Med-El implementation of continuous interleaved sampling with widely spaced electrode pair subsets of 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 out of a possible maximum of 12. An eight-vowel test, a 16-consonant test, and BKB sentences were presented against a background of pink noise. Additionally, AB monosyllabic words were presented both in quiet and in noise to processors with 6, 8, and 11 widely spaced electrodes. 11 subjects participated in the study.
RESULTS: Using moderate signal-to-noise ratios, for these patients the curve relating percentage score to increasing numbers of active channels approached an asymptote before the 10-channel data point was reached. Asymptotic performance was achieved using four channels for consonants, and eight channels for sentences. Understanding of monosyllabic words reached a maximum value at a similar number of channels for both quiet conditions and against a background of pink noise, and the mean increase in test score between 6 and 11 channels was only 7%.
CONCLUSIONS: These results are similar to those of previous experiments carried out in quiet listening conditions. The data suggest that 12 frequency channels (the number implemented by the COMBI 40+ cochlear implant) are more than adequate for users to achieve asymptotic performance levels in clinical speech tests applied in the presence of wideband noise at moderate signal-to-noise ratios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12476091     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200212000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  18 in total

1.  [Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

Authors:  J Müller; J Helms
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Initial Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming in Children.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Stephen M Camarata; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Clinical evaluation of an image-guided cochlear implant programming strategy.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; René H Gifford; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey W Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of upper-frequency boundary and spectral warping on speech intelligibility in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes.

Authors:  Sonya Singh; Ying-Yee Kong; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for an array with large inter-electrode distances.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.