| Literature DB >> 34207615 |
Akhikun Nahar1, Anthony L Baker1, David S Nichols2, John P Bowman1, Margaret L Britz1.
Abstract
Bacteria containing mycolic acids in their cell envelope are often recalcitrant to cell lysis, so extracting DNA of sufficient quality for third-generation sequencing and high-fidelity genome assembly requires optimization, even when using commercial kits with protocols for hard-to-lyse bacteria. We benchmarked three spin-column-based kits against a classical DNA extraction method employing lysozyme, proteinase K and SDS for six lysozyme-resistant, sub-Antarctic strains of Corynebaceriales. Prior cultivation in broths containing glycine at highly growth-inhibitory concentrations (4.0-4.5%) improved cell lysis using both classical and kit methods. The classical method produced DNA with average fragment sizes of 27-59 Kbp and tight fragment size ranges, meeting quality standards for genome sequencing, assembly and phylogenomic analyses. By 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we classified two strains as Williamsia and four strains as Rhodococcus species. Pairwise comparison of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF), plus genome clustering analysis, confirmed Rhodococcus sp. 1163 and 1168 and Williamsia sp. 1135 and 1138 as novel species. Phylogenetic, lipidomic and biochemical analyses classified psychrotrophic strains 1139 and 1159 as R. qingshengii and R. erythropolis, respectively, using ANI similarity of >98% and AF >60% for species delineation. On this basis, some members of the R. erythropolis genome cluster groups, including strains currently named as R. enclensis, R. baikonurensis, R. opacus and R. rhodochrous, would be reclassified either as R. erythropolis or R. qingshengii.Entities:
Keywords: ANI; Actinobacteria; DNA extraction; Rhodococcus erythropolis; Rhodococcus qingshengii; Williamsia; mycolic acids; next-generation sequencing; psychrotrophic
Year: 2021 PMID: 34207615 PMCID: PMC8227252 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Impact of glycine on growth of six sub-Antarctic strains. (A) An example of growth kinetics of strain Williamsia sp. 1138 in MSM-F broth supplemented with different concentrations of glycine; (B) means and standard deviations of maximum specific growth rates (µmax) for six strains cultured in MSM–glycine broths.
Average scores for DNA quality and quantity following extraction from Williamsia sp. 1138 cells cultured in MSM supplemented with 0, 2 and 4.5% glycine.
| Parameters | Method 1 | Method 2 | Method 3 | Method 4 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% a | 2% a | 4.5% a |
| 0% a | 2% a | 4.5% a |
| 0% a | 2% a | 4.5% a |
| 0% a | 2% a | 4.5% a | |
|
| 10 ± 1 | 39 ± 3.2 | 69 ± 2 | 295 ± 2 | 25.7 ± 1.1 | 45.7 ± 4.9 | 60.2 ± 6.7 | 74 ± 3.5 | 17 ± 2.6 | 42.2 ± 3.2 | 71.7 ± 3.5 | 79.4 ± 2.5 | 1.5 ± 0.35 | 6 ± 1.64 | 30.4 ± 4.1 |
|
| 0.9 ± 0.07 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.06 | 8.1 ± 0.04 | 8.4 ± 0.12 | 9.2 ± 0.03 | 6.5 ± 0.56 | 7.8 ± 0.35 | 7.6 ± 0.35 | 8.6 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.04 | 6.5 ± 0.28 | 9.0 ± 0.07 |
|
| 823–9763 | 557–1321 | 27–388 | 991–39,079 | 2019–40,109 | 2849–54,726 | 2755–54,903 | 1913–48,525 | 8549–49,782 | 7605–55,301 | 2891–50,707 | 6787–52,428 | 0–14 | 22,636–44,933 | 16,591–42,748 |
|
| 9554 | 490 | 128 | 13,975 | 21,246 | 18,923 | 17,284 | 26,027 | 24,249 | 26,555 | 23,410 | 32,406 | 2.0 | 33,581 | 28,430 |
|
| 2.0 ± 0.09 | 2.0 ± 0.04 | 2.0 ± 0.06 | 2.1 ± 0.03 | 2.0 ± 0.02 | 1.99 ± 0.04 | 1.88 ± 0 | 1.98 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 10.04 | 2.1 ± 0.01 | 2.1 ± 0.01 | 2.1 ± 0.09 | 1.96 ± 0.09 | 1.69 ± 0.04 | 1.70 ± 0.06 |
|
| 2.1 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ± 0.12 | 1.8 ± 0.03 | 1.9 ± 0.06 | 1.3 ± 0.12 | 1.4 ± 0.16 | 1.6 ± 0.06 | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 1.1 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.06 | 0.91 ± 0.3 | 1.65 ± 0.12 | 1.71 ± 0.03 |
|
| 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 200 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
a 0, 2, 4.5% are the concentrations of glycine in the culture medium for sub-Antarctic strains; b Concentration of DNA and GQN number obtained from Fragment Analyser analyses; c A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratio were obtained from NanoDrop spectrophotometry; s.d. = standard deviation.
Figure 2DNA fragment size analyses for four extraction methods of Williamsia sp. 1138 cells cultured in 4.5% MSM-G. (A) Amplitude readout from the Fragment Analyser and (B) images generated from the automated capillary electrophoresis system of the Fragment Analyser with size standards (bp) marked. Method 1: Isolate II Genomic DNA kit (Bioline) (_ peaks at 61 and 12,000 bp; Method 2: Ultraclean Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MO BIO) (_ peak at 19,915 bp); Method 3: QIAAMP Mini kit (Qiagen) (_ peak at 26,788 bp); Method 4: Classical extraction method (_ peak at 24,200 bp).
Quality and quantity scores for gDNA obtained from large-scale (50 mL) cultures of six sub-Antarctic strains.
| Strain Name | ng/µL a | GQN a | Fragment Size Range (Kbp) a | Average Size | A | A | Q30 (%) c | N50 d | L50 d | Contigs d | GC Content (%) d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.1 | 8.1 | 13.28–44.50 | 28.721 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 64.36 | 142.77 | 14 | 109 | 64.7 | |
| 319 | 9.8 | 57.24–62.78 | 59.424 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 63.92 | 191.09 | 12 | 54 | 64.8 | |
| 169.7 | 9.3 | 41.57–56.44 | 48.133 | 1.94 | 1.75 | 62.70 | 94.97 | 24 | 192 | 62.3 | |
| 106.2 | 8.7 | 11.63–48.44 | 27.142 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 65.11 | 196.55 | 13 | 114 | 62.3 | |
| 40.5 | 8.7 | 15.73–47.69 | 32.799 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 64.67 | 329.55 | 5 | 43 | 62.3 | |
| 66.3 | 9.5 | 9.72–51.78 | 27.334 | 2.01 | 1.88 | 66.25 | 154.59 | 10 | 97 | 62.1 |
a DNA concentration and GQN obtained from Fragment Analyser data. b A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratio were obtained by Nano Drop spectrophotometry. c Obtained from Macrogen: Q30 is the % of reads that have a phred quality score of over 30. d Obtained after assembly using ABySS software; N50 is the length of the shortest contig that provides 50% of the genome when information in contigs above this size is summed [1]; DNA GC content of assembled sequences.
Figure 3Neighbour-joining phylogenetic trees based on (A) BLAST analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained by PCR amplification of DNA extracted from six sub-Antarctic strains and (B) alkane 1-monooxygenase gene (alkB) gene sequences from whole genome sequences of Williamsia spp. 1135 and 1138 and Rhodococcus spp. 1139, 1159, 1163 and 1168. Bootstrap values shown at branch nodes were based on 1000 re-samplings and the alkB gene sequences in (B) are from published genomes of the type strains for the species selected. The sub-Antarctic strains are marked with a red arrow in panel (A).
ANI and AF comparisons for sub-Antarctic strains with type strains of R. erythropolis and R. qingshengii (panel A) and the closest neighbours of strains 1163 and 1168 (panel B), highlighting species identity between strains of R. erythropolis (orange shading) or R. qingshengii (green shading).
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| CCM 2595 |
| NCBI reference genome for the species | 98.83 | 95.55 | 95.60 | 95.57 | 95.67 | 98.86 | |
| NBRC 15567 = JCM 3201 b |
| Type strains, | 98.83 | 95.49 | 95.49 | 95.54 | 95.53 | 98.78 | |
| TUHH-12 |
| NCBI-cited genome publication for this species (2015) | 95.547 | 95.49 | 98.58 | 98.77 | 98.73 | 95.43 | |
| JCM 15477 c |
| Type strain, | 95.60 | 95.49 | 98.57 | 98.83 | 98.67 | 95.47 | |
| Djl-6-2 |
| Related to original isolate djl-6 type strain, | 95.57 | 95.54 | 98.79 | 98.82 | 98.91 | 95.53 | |
| 1139 | This study | 95.66 | 95.52 | 98.73 | 98.67 | 98.91 | 95.56 | ||
| 1159 | This study | 98.86 | 98.78 | 95.44 | 95.48 | 95.54 | 95.55 | ||
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| PAMC 28707 | 1163 | 1168 | |||||||
| PAMC 28705 PAMC 28707 | Published genome Korean Polar Research Institute (IMG/M) | 94.50 | 93.58 | ||||||
| 1163 | This study | 94.50 | 93.75 | ||||||
| 1168 | This study | 93.55 | 93.74 | ||||||
a Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF) were calculated using the IMG/M pairwise ANI tool; shading in panel A shows identity between species. b Genome BLAST (NCBI) indicated that these two strains are identical. c There are two genome sequences in IMG/M for the type strain JCM 15477: genome ID 2744054616 (NCBI GCF_001646745.1) was used for ANI pairwise comparisons here; ANI analysis of JCM 15477 genome ID 2734481946 (NCBI GCA_001313445.1) showed >99% ANI similarity but < 35% AF with genome ID 2744054616 and other strains named as R. qingshengii (Table S1).