Literature DB >> 34206435

How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study.

Ebony T Lewis1,2, Kathrine A Hammill3, Maree Ticehurst4, Robin M Turner5, Sally Greenaway6, Ken Hillman4,7, Joan Carlini8, Magnolia Cardona9,10.   

Abstract

We aimed to identify the level of prognostic disclosure, type of prognostic information and delivery format of prognostic communication that older adults diagnosed with a life-limiting illness or caregivers prefer to receive. We developed and pilot tested an open-ended survey to 15 older patients and caregivers who had experience in health services for life-limiting illness either for a relative, friend or themselves. Five hypothetical clinical scenarios of prognostic options were presented to ascertain preferences. The preferred format to receive prognostic information was verbal delivery by the clinician with a written summary. Photos and videos were less favoured, and a table with numbers/percentages was least preferred. Distress levels to the prognostic scenarios were low, with the exception of a photo. We conclude that older patients/caregivers want end-of-life prognostic information delivered the traditional way, verbally by clinicians. Options to deliver prognostic information may vary across patient groups but empower clinicians in introducing end-of-life discussions with patients/caregivers. Our study illustrates the feasibility of involving terminal patients and caregivers in research that contributes to eliciting prognostic preferences. Further research is needed to understand whether the prognostic preferences of hospitalized patients with life-limiting illness differ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; older adults; patient preference; prognosis; terminally ill

Year:  2021        PMID: 34206435     DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  29 in total

1.  Reasons why physicians do not have discussions about poor prognosis, why it matters, and what can be improved.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; France Légaré; Magenta B Simmons; Kevin McNamara; Kirsten McCaffery; Lyndal J Trevena; Ben Hudson; Paul P Glasziou; Christopher B Del Mar
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Kianna Montz; Siu L Hui; James E Slaven; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Risk communication and older people-understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  R Fuller; N Dudley; J Blacktop
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR and Intubation Video Decision Support Tool for Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Areej El-Jawahri; Susan L Mitchell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jennifer S Temel; Vicki A Jackson; Renee R Rutledge; Mihir Parikh; Aretha D Davis; Muriel R Gillick; Michael J Barry; Lenny Lopez; Elizabeth S Walker-Corkery; Yuchiao Chang; Kathleen Finn; Christopher Coley; Angelo E Volandes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Prognosis communication in serious illness: perceptions of older patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; John O'Leary
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Glyn Elwyn; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-11-09

Review 8.  Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karen Hancock; Josephine M Clayton; Sharon M Parker; Sharon Wal der; Phyllis N Butow; Sue Carrick; David Currow; Davina Ghersi; Paul Glare; Rebecca Hagerty; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.762

9.  A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients.

Authors:  Natasha Michael; Clare O'Callaghan; Angela Baird; Karla Gough; Mei Krishnasamy; Nathaniel Hiscock; Josephine Clayton
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Do people with multiple sclerosis want to know their prognosis? A UK nationwide study.

Authors:  Laura Dennison; Martina Brown; Sarah Kirby; Ian Galea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.