Literature DB >> 11742775

Risk communication and older people-understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older.

R Fuller1, N Dudley, J Blacktop.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine older people's understanding of probability and risk information, and the impact of pictorial representation of risk.
DESIGN: A researcher-administered questionnaire.
SUBJECTS: 50 inpatients aged > or =75 years on elderly medicine wards at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK.
RESULTS: Older people understand percentage probability better than fractional probability, and a wide range of incorrect responses indicated significant over- and underestimation of probabilities. Visual data about percentages were well received and understood, and were perceived as a good idea by participants.
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a wide variation in understanding of risk and probability information by older people, with over- and underestimations of probability, along with confusion between fractional and percentage probability. Pictorial representation of probability was well understood. It could be developed as a simple, yet powerful communication tool to be used in daily clinical practice to help older people understand information on risks and benefits when making decisions about treatment choices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742775     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/30.6.473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  16 in total

Review 1.  What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-04

2.  Horizontal mixture model for competing risks: a method used in waitlisted renal transplant candidates.

Authors:  Katy Trébern-Launay; Michèle Kessler; Sahar Bayat-Makoei; Anne-Hélène Quérard; Serge Briançon; Magali Giral; Yohann Foucher
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 3.  Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Yalini Senathirajah; Rita Kukafka; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Reformed consent: adapting to new media and research participant preferences.

Authors:  James Henry; Barton W Palmer; Lawrence Palinkas; Danielle Kukene Glorioso; Michael P Caligiuri; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

5.  Hedging their mets: the use of uncertainty terms in clinical documents and its potential implications when sharing the documents with patients.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Yang Liu; Qiaozhu Mei; Frank J Manion; Ulysses J Balis; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

6.  How do family physicians communicate about cardiovascular risk? Frequencies and determinants of different communication formats.

Authors:  Stefan Neuner-Jehle; Oliver Senn; Odette Wegwarth; Thomas Rosemann; Johann Steurer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  The @RISK Study: Risk communication for patients with type 2 diabetes: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura M C Welschen; Sandra D M Bot; Jacqueline M Dekker; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Trudy van der Weijden; Giel Nijpels
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Understanding, comprehensibility and acceptance of an evidence-based consumer information brochure on fall prevention in old age: a focus group study.

Authors:  Sabine Lins; Andrea Icks; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Patient Perspectives on the Risk-Based NLST Outcomes Tool for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Elizabeth L Seaman; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Paul K J Han; Hormuzd A Katki; Stephanie R Land; Robert A Liotta; Joel A Nations; P Gabriel Peterson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Frequency format diagram and probability chart for breast cancer risk communication: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Brianna J Crawford; Sandhya Pruthi; Constance I Williams; Lonzetta Neal; Nicole P Sandhu; Ruth E Johnson; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; Marcia K Britain; Stephen S Cha; Amit K Ghosh
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.