Literature DB >> 24305642

Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.

Natalie Joseph-Williams1, Glyn Elwyn2, Adrian Edwards3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making (SDM) and develop a taxonomy of patient-reported barriers.
METHODS: Systematic review and thematic synthesis. Study findings/results for each included paper were extracted verbatim and entered into qualitative software for inductive analysis.
RESULTS: Electronic and follow-up searches yielded 2956 unique references; 289 full-text articles were retrieved, of which 45 articles from 44 unique studies met inclusion criteria. Key descriptive themes were grouped under two broad analytical themes: how the healthcare system is organized (4 descriptive themes) and what happens during the decision-making interaction (4 descriptive themes, 10 sub-themes). Predominant emergent themes related to patients' knowledge and the power imbalance in the doctor-patient relationship. Patients need knowledge and power to participate in SDM - knowledge alone is insufficient and power is more difficult to attain.
CONCLUSION: Many barriers are potentially modifiable, and can be addressed by attitudinal changes at the levels of patient, clinician/healthcare team, and the organization. The results support the view that many patients currently can't participate in SDM, rather than they won't participate because they do not want to. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future implementation efforts should address patient-reported factors together with known clinician-reported barriers and the wider organizational context.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation; Patient-centered healthcare; Patient-reported barriers/facilitators; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24305642     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  288 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Distinctive psychological and social experiences of women choosing prophylactic oophorectomy for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Rachel Meadows; Tasleem J Padamsee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2018-02-02

3.  Behavioral intervention improves treatment outcomes among HIV-infected individuals who have delayed, declined, or discontinued antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial of a novel intervention.

Authors:  Marya Gwadz; Charles M Cleland; Elizabeth Applegate; Mindy Belkin; Monica Gandhi; Nadim Salomon; Angela Banfield; Noelle Leonard; Marion Riedel; Hannah Wolfe; Isaiah Pickens; Kelly Bolger; DeShannon Bowens; David Perlman; Donna Mildvan
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-10

4.  Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Natalie C Ernecoff; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Shannon S Carson; Catherine L Hough; J Randall Curtis; Wendy G Anderson; Jay Steingrub; Bernard Lo; Michael Matthay; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Shared Decision Making in Patients With Suspected Uncomplicated Ureterolithiasis: A Decision Aid Development Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Schoenfeld; Connor Houghton; Pooja M Patel; Leanora W Merwin; Kye P Poronsky; Anna L Caroll; Carol Sánchez Santana; Maggie Breslin; Charles D Scales; Peter K Lindenauer; Kathleen M Mazor; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Developing the Disorders of Consciousness Guideline and Challenges of Integrating Shared Decision-Making Into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

8.  Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Andy S L Tan; Daniel D Matlock; Barry Saver; Kathleen M Mazor; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-06

9.  Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham S Thomas; Alejandra N Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Jill Dimond; Joseph Finkelstein; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Raven David; Jennifer Vargas; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

10.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.